The 2011+ Mustang Thread - Page 112

Angrybird 12 · 03-16-2010, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G8GT4now

If Ford can get 412HP out of 5.0 liters, surely Chevy can get more than 422HP out of 6.2 liters!

But what is the Torque? that is where the extra CI usually gets the most benefit.

Mustang 412 HP
Camaro 426HP

Mustang 390Ft Lbs
Camaro 420Ft Lbs

14 hp but 30 ft Lb torque difference.

Hendrix-Engineering · 03-16-2010, 06:19 PM

I see no problem with 11-1cr and fi..We have made the most power of any gto, with a f1r we use 10.3 to 1....with 93 we get over 930 rwhp threw a 4l80.

Ghost of Vincent Price · 03-16-2010, 06:26 PM

Also the 5.0 has 4 valves so it breaths better off the bat without a cam(s) swap.

THE EVIL TW1N · 03-16-2010, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DevilKnightFalcon

I love how people think it is such a big deal that the Mustang beat the Camaro by 1hp and 1mpg (on the V6). Not to mention they are comparing a 2011 Mustang to the 2010 Camaro...how about we wait for specs on the 2011 Camaro and then we'll see.

it gets 2 mpg better (v6) than the camaro. and 7 ft. lbs. of tq more.

81z28355 · 03-16-2010, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyman 08

But what is the Torque? that is where the extra CI usually gets the most benefit.

Mustang 412 HP
Camaro 426HP

Mustang 390Ft Lbs
Camaro 420Ft Lbs

14 hp but 30 ft Lb torque difference.

Mustang 3600lb
Camaro 3900lb

But honestly money will be the only limeting factor with these cars and the aftermarket.

off the showroom floor the Mustang with brembo brakes and 3:73 gears will out run the 2010 Camaro.

Whoever has the deepest pockets will be fastest always has been and always will be that way.

Angrybird 12 · 03-16-2010, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 81z28355

Mustang 3600lb
Camaro 3900lb

But honestly money will be the only limeting factor with these cars and the aftermarket.

off the showroom floor the Mustang with brembo brakes and 3:73 gears will out run the 2010 Camaro.

Whoever has the deepest pockets will be fastest always has been and always will be that way.

it's all bench racing until you get it on the track... I bet in many cases the driver will be the determining factor, as it is today...

dirtydogg · 03-16-2010, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thecamaroguy

http://www.musclecarblog.com/887-201...ontent=Twitter

CAMARO CAMARO CAMARO CAMARO THIS IS A CAMARO FORUM

:mad0 260:

TeH BawNeY · 03-16-2010, 06:57 PM

They still dont compare in looks, the Mustang isn't even on the same continent.

Ghost of Vincent Price · 03-16-2010, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N

it gets 2 mpg better (v6) than the camaro. and 7 ft. lbs. of tq more.

Ohh yay! [sinister voice]Ill wait for chevy to unveil their v6....then, then my master plan. I'll tune my v6 to get 1 extra hp and 2mpg better. Every woman will want one!!!![/sinister voice]

THE EVIL TW1N · 03-16-2010, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TeH BawNeY

They still dont compare in looks, the Mustang isn't even on the same continent.

I agree, it's out of this world! There's nothing that can really compare to it

the new mustang is that good!

The new retro camaro is almost as good though, i'll give it that.

Inferno Orange 2SS-RS · 03-16-2010, 07:53 PM

5.0 GT may be fast, but there is no replacement for displacement. Call it what you want, but 6.2 is a bigger number than 5.0 and the 6.2 has more torque.

Quote:

Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N

lol "big honk'en" and "6.2" don't belong in the same sentance.

Ghost of Vincent Price · 03-16-2010, 07:54 PM

I dunno man. The v6 and gt are mighty boring looking. Im pretty sure you would find that under fact in the dictionary.

I know one thing, I cant wait to start lining up next to 5.0's on the street again.

Blownhotrodder · 03-16-2010, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolman

pushrods are weak and inefficient. good riddance.

Thats why they are still being used by GM right.

Ghost of Vincent Price · 03-16-2010, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolman

pushrods are weak and inefficient. good riddance.

Normally you dont say stupid things.

View Poll Results: .
Camaro	0	0%
Mustang	0	0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

03-16-2010, 06:19 PM	#1556
Hendrix-Engineering Account Suspended Drives: First 9 inch-12 bolt IRS Camaro Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: nc Posts: 1,835	For what its worth I see no problem with 11-1cr and fi..We have made the most power of any gto, with a f1r we use 10.3 to 1....with 93 we get over 930 rwhp threw a 4l80.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread	Beau Tie	Chevy Camaro vs...	3644	03-09-2012 08:45 PM
Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro?	5thGenOwner	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	111	12-06-2011 11:06 AM
Official 2011 Mustang GT info released	nester7929	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	81	12-28-2009 04:13 PM

03-16-2010, 06:26 PM	#1557
Ghost of Vincent Price Banned Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: underground Posts: 374	Also the 5.0 has 4 valves so it breaths better off the bat without a cam(s) swap.

03-16-2010, 06:57 PM	#1562
TeH BawNeY Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: NY Baby girl, unda yo hood, checkin yo shit out Posts: 53	They still dont compare in looks, the Mustang isn't even on the same continent.

03-16-2010, 07:54 PM	#1566
Ghost of Vincent Price Banned Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: underground Posts: 374	I dunno man. The v6 and gt are mighty boring looking. Im pretty sure you would find that under fact in the dictionary. I know one thing, I cant wait to start lining up next to 5.0's on the street again.