6-Speed SRT review

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by porcupinekiller

I guess you forgot about the ZR1 Corvette huh? Last time I checked it was from Chevrolet and it is one bas ass "supercharged" ride.

you forget my point..............They need a supercharger to make it fast....the c6 is rediculously fast to begin with. The zr1 is a amazing ride but you also have the NA viper which is a fun ride as well.

[porcupinekiller]

Superchargers, cams, longtubes etc it's all good if it makes it faster.

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by porcupinekiller

Superchargers, cams, longtubes etc it's all good if it makes it faster.

I agree but I am an old school 600 hp pushing big block guy at heart haha but yea all mods are great as long as they make you faster ...

[BowtieGuy]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

you forget my point..............They need a supercharger to make it fast....the c6 is rediculously fast to begin with. The zr1 is a amazing ride but you also have the NA viper which is a fun ride as well.

You could make the same argument against the Viper. They needed two extra cylinders to make it fast...*prod*

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by BowtieGuy

You could make the same argument against the Viper. They needed two extra cylinders to make it fast...*prod*

there is no replacement for displacement is my motto.

[BowtieGuy]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

there is no replacement for displacement is my motto.

*Bow's* Touche salesman.

[headpunter]

the viper engine is rubbish, grats on having a truck engine in your flagship performance car

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by headpunter

the viper engine is rubbish, grats on having a truck engine in your flagship performance car

i guess truck engines are better than supercharged corvette engines...cuz last time i checked it holds the record lap time and the zr1 came in second.


I know its coming so bring on the excuses.

ZOMG THE VIPER HAD NO AIR? RAWRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR CHEATER!

[headpunter]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

i guess truck engines are better than supercharged corvette engines...cuz last time i checked it holds the record lap time and the zr1 came in second.


I know its coming so bring on the excuses.

ZOMG THE VIPER HAD NO AIR? RAWRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR CHEATER!

its ok you can be faster, at least id be comfortable in a zr1. as long as we are both faster then the GTR and other imports

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by headpunter

its ok you can be faster, at least id be comfortable in a zr1. as long as we are both faster then the GTR and other imports

exactly.........exactly and as long as the cars we beat them with are manual unlike their auto gtr....lol

[porcupinekiller]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

there is no replacement for displacement is my motto.

4.6 liters(engine displacement) + 2.3 liters(supercharger displacement)=6.9 liters!!! Therefore I agree. There is no replacement for displacement.
I had a 1969 428 CJ Mach I years back and I loved the torque of that beast. But my little 281 cui engine with the twin screw on it feels pretty sweet when you nail the go pedal (and it sounds awesome). It pulls hard from 2500 rpm and I only need to shift at 6000 rpm (just like my old big block). It's shown quite a few vintage big block muscle cars its tail lights at the 1/4 mile track.

[headpunter]

Originally Posted by porcupinekiller

4.6 liters(engine displacement) + 2.3 liters(supercharger displacement)=6.9 liters!!! Therefore I agree. There is no replacement for displacement.
I had a 1969 428 CJ Mach I years back and I loved the torque of that beast. But my little 281 cui engine with the twin screw on it feels pretty sweet when you nail the go pedal (and it sounds awesome). It pulls hard from 2500 rpm and I only need to shift at 6000 rpm (just like my old big block). It's shown quite a few vintage big block muscle cars its tail lights at the 1/4 mile track.

not as good as 6.2 l + 2.3L = 8.5l........

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by porcupinekiller

4.6 liters(engine displacement) + 2.3 liters(supercharger displacement)=6.9 liters!!! Therefore I agree. There is no replacement for displacement.
I had a 1969 428 CJ Mach I years back and I loved the torque of that beast. But my little 281 cui engine with the twin screw on it feels pretty sweet when you nail the go pedal (and it sounds awesome). It pulls hard from 2500 rpm and I only need to shift at 6000 rpm (just like my old big block). It's shown quite a few vintage big block muscle cars its tail lights at the 1/4 mile track.

i see.....

[porcupinekiller]

Originally Posted by headpunter

not as good as 6.2 l + 2.3L = 8.5l........

Yup that should be a pretty wild ride, what do you figure about 600 HP at the flywheel? Then I'd worry.... a little. My brother in law plans on supercharging a new Camaro sometime in the future. Until then I'm still pretty safe with a 500 HP Mustang.