The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-15-2010, 11:41 PM   #253
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huggerorange73 View Post
Good point!

I never mentioned boost in the 5.0/4.6 statement. All I said was it was a rwhp limit of around 425 - 450 depending on the dyno.

I'm done here....I can't win because the Mustang is clearly god's gift to motoring and the Camaro and the LS3 are clearly junk.

ENJOY!
Considering nobody has blown a 5.0 yet and there are more than one in the 10's, I would say your guess is off.



http://www.youtube.com/user/evoperfo.../2/gwJsmTVN9vY

You think that's less than 450whp? They made 420+ with bolt ons THEN put 100+ shots of nitrous on and didn't blow anything after many passes. Your guess is just a guess and any and all facts suggest your conclusion is pretty far off. Oh and ~450rwhp is about the safe limit on the 4.6 and the 5.0 is without a doubt considerably stronger. Are you one of the people that said the 5.0 wouldn't respond well to mods and that it was maxed from the factory? I bet you are.

Don't get pissed because people disagree with you. You have zero facts to back your conclusion and nobody is ragging on the ls3, yet you run to the "mustang is gods gift and the ls3 sucks" crap. Back up your statements or expect people to disagree.
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 12:44 AM   #254
All-Or-Nothing
Account Suspended
 
Drives: BMW 6 series Vert
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Right Here
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro View Post
Considering nobody has blown a 5.0 yet and there are more than one in the 10's, I would say your guess is off.



http://www.youtube.com/user/evoperfo.../2/gwJsmTVN9vY

You think that's less than 450whp? They made 420+ with bolt ons THEN put 100+ shots of nitrous on and didn't blow anything after many passes. Your guess is just a guess and any and all facts suggest your conclusion is pretty far off. Oh and ~450rwhp is about the safe limit on the 4.6 and the 5.0 is without a doubt considerably stronger. Are you one of the people that said the 5.0 wouldn't respond well to mods and that it was maxed from the factory? I bet you are.

Don't get pissed because people disagree with you. You have zero facts to back your conclusion and nobody is ragging on the ls3, yet you run to the "mustang is gods gift and the ls3 sucks" crap. Back up your statements or expect people to disagree.

Last edited by All-Or-Nothing; 08-16-2010 at 04:36 AM.
All-Or-Nothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 03:56 AM   #255
Craig
 
Drives: 2023 SLE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack View Post
Ford is offers options (aka choices) from the factory. Contrast this to a 'single model' philosophy, where if you want better gears, suspension, supercharger, etc... you need to throw away your stock parts and pay a third part to install the performance options you wanted in the first place......hmmm, I get it.
A package this unbelievably good is bound to bring out a few haters, who would undoubtedly be singing from the rooftops if Chevy offered something comparable.

Only things I would ask of Ford would be an optional stripe delete, and please build as many as the market demands. But unfortunately we all know it will be a limited edition and this performance bargain of the decade will be anything but once the dealers have their say.

The upside is that if Ford's recent history is a judge then many of these improvements will trickle down in a couple years time. Imagine a new track pack with the 5-way shocks, adjustable steering, 4-pot Brembos and Recaros available on the base GT.
Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 09:36 AM   #256
Supermans
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
 
Supermans's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
A package this unbelievably good is bound to bring out a few haters, who would undoubtedly be singing from the rooftops if Chevy offered something comparable.

Only things I would ask of Ford would be an optional stripe delete, and please build as many as the market demands. But unfortunately we all know it will be a limited edition and this performance bargain of the decade will be anything but once the dealers have their say.

The upside is that if Ford's recent history is a judge then many of these improvements will trickle down in a couple years time. Imagine a new track pack with the 5-way shocks, adjustable steering, 4-pot Brembos and Recaros available on the base GT.
Ford always offers a stripe and spoiler delete in all its packages..
__________________
Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266
Supermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 10:50 AM   #257
2010-1SS-IBM

 
Drives: 1998 Nissan, 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
But unfortunately we all know it will be a limited edition and this performance bargain of the decade will be anything but once the dealers have their say.
Yeah, the dealers could screw it up if it's a limited edition. But, if Ford makes it part of their regular line-up sitting between the GT and the GT-500 (a big if, there may not be much room between those two price-wise, and Ford would have to worry about canabalizing their own products), I think it will sell well.
2010-1SS-IBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 10:55 AM   #258
chain777
 
Drives: Slow
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Metro Chicago,Illinois
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Awesome View Post
There are plenty of gaudy sticker packages available in the Camaro aftermarket to make them look just as fast.
So now the Boss is just a "sticker" package. You don't have a clue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
A package this unbelievably good is bound to bring out a few haters, who would undoubtedly be singing from the rooftops if Chevy offered something comparable.<snip

^^^

.
chain777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:08 AM   #259
C4
ERNEST
 
C4's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012CAMARO 1LT RS CONVERTIBLE
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Posts: 2,237
i got to love thoughs red rims... wicked
C4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:50 AM   #260
sik68
 
sik68's Avatar
 
Drives: 1968 Camaro, 2002 Subaru WRX
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 86
I sat in the new black/red Boss on Saturday at Laguna Seca. This was my first time in a 2011 Mustang, and I can say that Ford has improved the Mustang by leaps and bounds, even over the 2009 models. The livery is definitely over the top, but in person it is not as gaudy as it comes across in photos. It is a bit more tasteful in person. The front splitter on the Laguna Seca package is humongous! The rear seat delete with the x member is a very cool touch.

The seats are very supportive for street seats, with bolstering in all the right places per typical Recaro. The shifter throws are pleasantly short (yeah I went through the gears a few times in my head). Driver ergonomics are very good: visibility, steering wheel-to-seat-to pedal relationships are all great for feeling connected to the car.

I also convinced a Ford Rep who was positioning the car to rev it...he happily obliged. Idle is whisper quiet, but just off idle it starts to cackle. It's not a deep pitch (what can you expect from 5.0L) but it sounds urgent when it revs. If for nothing else, I think the side pipes really help project the noise in all directions. Definitely louder than a new Camaro but overall still quiet. Almost any aftermarket exhaust you hear on the street is louder. Upon delivery, I would immediately remove the librarian in the sidepipe.

Very cool car; the Boss projects the "form following function" mantra, while I'd argue that the new Camaro is, sadly, more the opposite. For the sake of the rivalry, Chevy needs a sharper model that will directly compete with the Boss; and it shouldn't be supercharged.
__________________
Steven

1968 Camaro: Project "TRACKDAY"

Track Day In-Car Camera

Build in Progress

Last edited by sik68; 08-16-2010 at 12:01 PM.
sik68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 01:59 PM   #261
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
I am beginning to think this car is a little underrated at 440hp.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 02:14 PM   #262
BigDan

 
Drives: bug
Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
What make's you think that? I haven't really dove into the new enhancements and haven't seen any video's describing the the new hp parts. It would be nice though if it was making about 465hp. I cant wait to see all the up coming tester videos.

This Boss 302 is a very very good thing for the automotive industry especially in our segment. No doubt Chevy, Dodge, Nissan, Hyundai, and Toyota will all soon follow suit with light weight road course type versions just like everyone offered in the 60's-70's.

Hopefully Chevy wont wait till the next platform of the Camaro to offer a similar package. Just think about using the Gran Sports dry sump LS3 with a bump in power maybe e85 capable, Peddlers top of the line suspension, rear seat delete, light weight racing wheels and tires, and optional light weight super stripper version with only AC. They could and probably offer something similar just to give the Boss 302 some competition just like they did with the z/28 for not that much time or R&D or increase in price.

Last edited by BigDan; 08-16-2010 at 02:27 PM.
BigDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 02:27 PM   #263
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDan View Post
What make's you think that? I haven't really dove into the new enhancements and haven't seen any video's describing the the new hp parts.
ported heads, more aggressive cams, and intake. along with pushing the hp up higher in the rpm range.

I just think porting the heads, putting better cams in, and adding an intake are worth a little bit more than 28 hp.

Could be wrong though.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 03:01 PM   #264
assasinator
1 n the head,2 n da chest
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huggerorange73 View Post
I've seen multiple 4.6 blocks blow up on the dyno that say otherwise...not trying to be an ass, just calling it like it is.

* If you're talking 475 crank HP then you are 100% correct * just wanted to clarify that

seeing 4.6 2V engine blow up on the dyno is not the same as 3v or 4v. 425rwhp is not even CLOSE to the limits of 3v and 4v 4.6's. and 5.0 rods are factors stronger. your experiences have nothing to do with the 5.0.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet

Last edited by assasinator; 08-16-2010 at 03:12 PM.
assasinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 03:13 PM   #265
assasinator
1 n the head,2 n da chest
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sax1031 View Post
ported heads, more aggressive cams, and intake. along with pushing the hp up higher in the rpm range.

I just think porting the heads, putting better cams in, and adding an intake are worth a little bit more than 28 hp.

Could be wrong though.

considering the broken-in 380rwhp dynos of 5.0 gt's, 440hp is pretty underated. i dont know the internal differences, but externally that intake looks like the boss302R GT racing intake. it does have a slightly lower peak hp rpm. if 7500 is the real boss 302's peak power rpm.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
assasinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 03:24 PM   #266
zero
 
zero's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by assasinator View Post
considering the broken-in 380rwhp dynos of 5.0 gt's, 440hp is pretty underated. i dont know the internal differences, but externally that intake looks like the boss302R GT racing intake. it does have a slightly lower peak hp rpm. if 7500 is the real boss 302's peak power rpm.
how does it have slightly lower peak hp if it`s rated at 440hp and the GT rated at 412hp ?
zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 2011+ Mustang Thread GatorBlue371 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 11874 08-23-2011 01:30 PM
My Shootout: 2010 Camaro SS vs. 2011 Mustang GT nester7929 Chevy Camaro vs... 13 06-02-2010 10:37 PM
Help the Camaro win Motortrend's Championship truth411 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 56 07-02-2009 06:10 AM
2007 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Convertible KILLER74Z28 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 10 04-11-2008 05:11 PM
Financial Problems for Ford??? TAG UR IT General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 14 10-29-2006 07:17 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.