2016 NFL predicition thread

[Joe M 2012 2SS]

Originally Posted by Kenny Camaro

Oh, I see that. Just like I saw poor execution on the 22 yard line by the number one offense in the NFL. Rather than seeking comfort in an alternate outcome by hypethitcal theories, asses the actual play that happened and embrace the fact that poor execution caused failure. Any other play that had that level of execution would have failed also, possibly worse, hypethitically.

Rather then call a play that can potentially put you out of field goal range, call a play that will not. A running play isn't going for a 12 yard loss 99.999% of the time.

Your stuck on stupid, cruising on dumb, and wavering amongst complete idiocy.

Are you related to Kyle "Bonehead" Shanahan by the way?

[Kenny Camaro]

Originally Posted by Joe M 2012 2SS

Rather then call a play that can potentially put you out of field goal range, call a play that will not. A running play isn't going for a 12 yard loss 99.999% of the time.

Your stuck on stupid, cruising on dumb, and wavering amongst complete idiocy.

Are you related to Kyle "Bonehead" Shanahan by the way?

Yeah, reality sucks, doesn't it. Lol

[Dmpsix]

Originally Posted by Kenny Camaro

Oh, I see that. Just like I saw poor execution on the 22 yard line by the number one offense in the NFL. Rather than seeking comfort in an alternate outcome by hypethitcal theories, asses the actual play that happened and embrace the fact that poor execution caused failure. Any other play that had that level of execution would have failed also, possibly worse, hypethitically.

To be fair he did say that a few times. But... I still don't see the point in this argument anymore. Pats won, Falcons lost.

[Kenny Camaro]

With compitant execution, the play that was called may have scored a touchdown. What's the percentages of coming back from 15 points down,hmmmm?

[Joe M 2012 2SS]

Originally Posted by Kenny Camaro

With compitant execution, the play that was called may have scored a touchdown. What's the percentages of coming back from 15 points down,hmmmm?

No point in explaining that to you, your incapable of understanding logic anyway.

No point in going any further here.

You can give logical explanations to illogical people, and they are still going to be illogical.

Ignorance is truly bliss.

[PoorMansCamaro]

Originally Posted by Kenny Camaro

With compitant execution, the play that was called may have scored a touchdown. What's the percentages of coming back from 15 points down,hmmmm?

You realize you are saying coaching does not exist in the NFL, right? I mean, why have a coach, when any play will work, as long as it's executed properly? Do you see how dumb that sounds? Hello? Is this real life?

[Joe M 2012 2SS]

Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro

You realize you are saying coaching does not exist in the NFL, right? I mean, why have a coach, when any play will work, as long as it's executed properly? Do you see how dumb that sounds? Hello? Is this real life?

You can't explain logical conclusions to someone who doesn't have the capacity to comprehend it.

Don't waste your time.

[Dmpsix]

End of discussion

[PoorMansCamaro]

Can't spell elite without Eli!!!!

[Kenny Camaro]

Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro

Can't spell elite without Eli!!!!

Mr. Execution in the clutch.

[Kenny Camaro]

Originally Posted by Joe M 2012 2SS

You can't explain logical conclusions to someone who doesn't have the capacity to comprehend it.

Don't waste your time.

Your wasting your time, live your fantasy. Your hanging on to a premise of conjecture, while I'll hang on to the reality of what really happened. There's far more logic in accepting reality than wishing for something that didn't happen.

[Kenny Camaro]

[QUOTE=PoorMansCamaro;9549249]You realize you are saying coaching does not exist in the NFL, right? I mean, why have a coach, when any play will work, as long as it's executed properly? Do you see how dumb that sounds? Hello? Is this real life?[/QUOTE
The play didn't work because it was not done well enough to be succsessful. I doubt they made that play. Put it in the playbook, practice it all year, call it in the Super Bowl, because it's concept wasn't good. The receiver was wide open that the ball was supposed to go to, the center blocks better or Ryan noticed him getting beat and rolls out or just avoids the rush , it's a touchdown. That is the point of the game, to score touch downs and win.

[Joe M 2012 2SS]

Originally Posted by Kenny Camaro

Your wasting your time, live your fantasy. Your hanging on to a premise of conjecture, while I'll hang on to the reality of what really happened. There's far more logic in accepting reality than wishing for something that didn't happen.

I understand exactly what happened.

The Falcons were a 98% favorite with 4 minutes left.

They needed to accomplish only 3 easy plays. Run the ball twice more, don't fumble, burn the clock. Kick the FG.

I accept the outcome of the game perfectly, but what you do not accept is the fact that inside 45 yards, based upon his 15 years in the NFL, there is a 98% chance Matt Bryant makes it from inside 45 yards.

You don't throw this chance away. Shanahan did.

Deny it all you want. It's the truth.

[Kenny Camaro]

I'm ot in denial about anything. If the play in question had been successful, would you still say it was the wrong call? The only thing wrong with the call is that it didn't work. This gave armchair quarterbacks a butt hurting some people will never get over. It amazes me that one play on offense gets blamed for losing the game, when the defense gave up five consecutive scoring drives and 32 straight points. How logical is that? 98%? More? Less? Your myoptic point of view is illogical. 17 straight minutes of defensive collapse of historic proportions, yet you are obsessed with 17 seconds of offense. Can't you admit that the defense has more to shoulder than the offense in loseing the game? That would be logical.