The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-27-2015, 01:56 PM   #15
Whos_Drivin

 
Drives: '12 Camaro ZL1, '16 Silverado Z71
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Blaine, MN
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartan01 View Post
This^^^, EXACTLY...
Well spoken sir.
This is precisely why the new GTO failed.
It was a great performance based car, that was simply rebadged, and then given an iconic moniker.
It looked nothing like the legendary GTO of old, it looked like an Oldsmobile Alero
I thought the GTO failed because it couldn't meet the increasing safety standards.
Whos_Drivin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 02:04 PM   #16
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
No, because it would essentially be the same thing as the Camaro. What would make it different enough for someone to walk into their chevy dealer and buy a chevelle over a camaro?
Not even that, it has to draw people in that otherwise wouldn't be buying a Camaro (or Corvette or Impala or CTS or other GM vehicle).

Just to make my point clearer, I'll pull some numbers out of thin air. The Camaro sells roughly 80k units a year. A Chevelle would probably max out at half that, so 40k units. There's a good chance that half of them (20k) are poached from Camaro sales. Of the remaining 20k, quite a few would probably be coming from folks that would otherwise be buying something else in the GM lineup -lets say half of that remainder (10k).

So, in this little exercise a new Chevelle selling 40k units a year (a marginal number for a model to begin with) adds 10k sales to GMs total while bringing Camaro sales down from 80k to 60k and a variety of other models take a slight hit as well. Not worth the investment on their end. Even changing the numbers around a bit and it still gets hard to see more than 20k added sales per year.

About the only 'muscle car' that would have a chance at being brought back would be a Grand National/GNX because it wouldn't have any immediate competition from its own brand but even that would poach quite a few sales directly from the ATS & CTS as well as the Camaro.





GM ditched Pontiac and Saturn largely because those brands caused too much internal competition. Even now there's still quite a bit. Its one thing to fill a niche with a trim package or import an already built car from overseas. But to spend a billion and a half developing an all new model for a handful of sales would be a gigantic waste of money.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 02:07 PM   #17
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whos_Drivin View Post
I thought the GTO failed because it couldn't meet the increasing safety standards.
Thats likely why it was cancelled when it was, but very few people bought them before it was cancelled & therefore its deemed a failure.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 02:13 PM   #18
Spartan01


 
Spartan01's Avatar
 
Drives: Evil Eva, 2010 2SS LS3
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Falls Church, Virginia
Posts: 3,600
The BNX was a monster, and (for the time) a marvel of engineering.
It was also a V6 turbo.

Build it to compete with the new turbo cars coming out.

My point about the GTO is that the original GTO's were ICONIC, and trendsetting for their looks and power.
They brought it back with no looks whatsoever, yet badged it with the moniker of a legend. At that time there was no Camaro in production. had they done it right and really mad a sweet retro restyling it would have been way more successful.
__________________
"You simply cannot trust quotes found on the internet." -Abraham Lincoln
Spartan01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 02:31 PM   #19
arkentect

 
arkentect's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SGM 1LT M6
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,630
Car Companies need to stop digging up older models. They will never be able to bring a design forward that is worth an Iconic name like the Chevelle. Hell look what they did to the Charger, one of the biggest muscle car names of its time, AND THEY MADE IT A FAMILY SEDAN?!?! Da Fuq?

Come out with something new instead. Make something new that will eventually become Iconic.
arkentect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 02:35 PM   #20
Spartan01


 
Spartan01's Avatar
 
Drives: Evil Eva, 2010 2SS LS3
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Falls Church, Virginia
Posts: 3,600
Good idea, but you are asking too much.

The same thing is going on in Hollywood, just spitting out remakes of old movies, hardly ever a new idea...
__________________
"You simply cannot trust quotes found on the internet." -Abraham Lincoln
Spartan01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 02:37 PM   #21
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by arkentect View Post
Car Companies need to stop digging up older models. They will never be able to bring a design forward that is worth an Iconic name like the Chevelle. Hell look what they did to the Charger, one of the biggest muscle car names of its time, AND THEY MADE IT A FAMILY SEDAN?!?! Da Fuq?

Come out with something new instead. Make something new that will eventually become Iconic.
Not only that but in the current market as DGthe3 pointed out you can't have that much internal competition. This isnt the 60's anymore. There isn't room in the Chevy line up for another 2 door V-8 powered vehicle.

Make something new, tackle a new market. GM has shown that they can build one hell of a pony car when the right people are pressing the buttons. 1LE, SS, ZL1, Z/28, that's an impressive line up to take on Mustang and Challenger. I would love to see GM battle Ford in the hot hatch segment, the Focus ST and RS need some competition.
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 02:40 PM   #22
Spartan01


 
Spartan01's Avatar
 
Drives: Evil Eva, 2010 2SS LS3
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Falls Church, Virginia
Posts: 3,600
To quote comedian Rich Voss:
Maybe they can make a hybrid car that doesn't look like a gay space shuttle."
__________________
"You simply cannot trust quotes found on the internet." -Abraham Lincoln
Spartan01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 02:53 PM   #23
its a syn
B.O.D. 02/16/10
 
its a syn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SGM Sp. Edition 2017 RS Conver
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Albia,Iowa
Posts: 3,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
There is absolutely nothing about that car that says Chevelle. Chevy will never bring back the Chevelle but, on the microscopic chance they did, it should be done right. Not throwing the badge on some generic sedan like that render.
The chevelle changed drastically through the generations. Why not this car? Do you want it to be just like your '70 Chevelle? That would be boring. Quite a useless argument anyway as one said the last thing GM wants is interbrand competition.
__________________
its a syn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 03:13 PM   #24
arkentect

 
arkentect's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SGM 1LT M6
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,630
I myself am hoping for a Mid-Engine Corvette to compete with the Ford GT. Lol I know i'll never be able to afford one but at least Chevy will have something I can start to drool over again.
arkentect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 05:09 PM   #25
FenwickHockey65
General Motors Aficionado
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2023 Expedition
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,375
Send a message via AIM to FenwickHockey65
No.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation
2023 Ford Expedition SSV (State-Issued)
FenwickHockey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 07:09 PM   #26
roorback
 
Drives: V8 permagrin
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: here
Posts: 618
I've said it before and my .02 means nothing but if GM ruins my favorite car with some half-assed, crap new-age Chevelle (ala GTO, Nova of the 80's) I'm never ever buying another GM again.
roorback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 07:34 PM   #27
rocket403

 
rocket403's Avatar
 
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
That is the main reason that I stepped away from GM they ruined the Cutlass and came out with a FWD Cutlass killed all the good Olds cars like the 98, 88, Cutlass. They did such a bad job of Olds that they killed off the whole division.

Last edited by rocket403; 02-27-2015 at 08:06 PM.
rocket403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 07:48 PM   #28
ChrisBlair
Buick 455 Fan
 
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartan01 View Post
Bring back the Buick GNX.
Maybe even have a 6 and 8 version.
An 8 cylinder GNX is blasphemy before Man and God and I will not stand for it. An 8 Cylinder Buick "X" car is a GSX.
510 lb/ft, naturally aspirated. I have nothing against a GN or GNX, I almost traded my '70 for one.


__________________
ChrisBlair is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.