|
|
#15 |
|
OH CANADA!
Drives: 2011 RAM 1500 LARAMIE Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB, CAN
Posts: 3,930
|
i don't like the sound of it. sounds like too much could go wrong. the risk isn't worth the reward IMO
__________________
Had to trade in the Camaro for a truck :(, but hopefully I can join the Camaro family again one day ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Drives: Ford Focus Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
Yes my fuel system is sealed. every fuel system is. gasoline would evaporate right out of your tank if it wasnt. instead though it vaporises untill the environment becomes saturated. since acetone is more volatile than gasoline its going to vaporise faster, meaning your going to have a high concentration of acetone vapors. sure it will still be burned, but its not going to take a whole tank of gas to burn it out. like i said, i predict it being useful for less than 1/4 of a tank... and thats if you drive it straight. As per the ethanol being more hydrophillic? i cant say conclusively. I ran a Karl-Fisher titration for water on the acetone. this is the method we use to detect water in ethanol. currently its reading 2.42% water and still climbing. as reference EtOH usually peaks at .56% water from environment absorbtion. the reason i cant say conclusively is that the titration is still going after almost an hour. normally its a short 5 minute test, leading me to beleive acetone is somehow interupting the detector... so really i cant say if it really has a high ammount of water or if its detector is botched. Water doesnt compress very well, doesnt combust, and doesnt have a negative net effect on heat like the chemical reaction of combustion does. to get water out of your gasoline yes you want it absorbed... but if ther is no water i wouldnt want to bring in unnecessary water from the environment, ya know? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My hat's off to you, sir, for actually doing an experiment and measuring the result.
I still don't see how acetone would magically produce more water. Whatever water is already in your tank (airborne or condensed) is already going to get sucked up by the ethanol and is going through your engine either way. Acetone isn't going to bring more water in. Acetone also isn't going to improve your fuel economy or power...
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios 2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong) 1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CANADIAN GAS MILEAGE! V6 AUTO | turab16 | Canada | 29 | 05-04-2009 02:06 PM |
| V-6 mustang EPA Gas Mileage | comiskeybum | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 33 | 03-18-2009 07:05 PM |
| Massachusetts may consider mileage chip | bigralph | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 12 | 02-20-2009 09:58 PM |
| GM: Natural Gas is an enticing alternative | Mr. Wyndham | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 12 | 08-02-2008 09:02 PM |
| Punks puncture gas tanks | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 22 | 05-30-2008 03:19 AM |