|
|
#57 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
![]() Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
SS > R/T
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
RT is a good match against L99 camaros.they put up a decent fight against 5.0's and Ls3 but at a decided disadvantage in speed but they ARE "more car" than the comp.
392 is a good match against fully loaded 5.0 and LS3 SS they dont really have an answer for the gt500 yet it seems but thats ok, GM is barely even getting to that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
What kind of backs this up is that Mopar just announced a new aluminum 426 Hemi at the beginning of the year for sale as a street ready crate motor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
i just saw road and track got 13.0@109.8 with a 392, pretty much on par with an lS3 SS and 5.0 i thought they were faster than that. ive seen videos as fast as 114mph but tests seem to be averaging maybe 109-111mph. 4350lbs doesnt help. sheesh theyve gained almost 200lbs since they came out!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
Quote:
wouldnt it be easier to use the v10? anyways i expect a car like that at $60,000 for sheez. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
but the trap speeds are whats troubling. I thought theyd be trapping 112-114mph but actually it looks like theyre averaging only about 110mph accross the board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 99 Camaro SS, 79 z28, 70 GTX Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 1,759
|
110 is pretty slow
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
not slow, but for the segment is average. Ive also seen a few 109's as well.
they seem to be averaging maybe 420rwhp/tq. if you combine that with 4350lbs +200lbs driver on my favorite calculator they should average 111mph which seems in line with what we're seeing i guess. http://www.competitiondiesel.com/Phil/bg/ i guess the 114mph is not gonna be that common or was an anamoly and should expect 109-111mph with some 112's |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 | Sawyer | Chevy Camaro vs... | 277 | 08-01-2011 04:28 AM |
| Production 2008 Challenger (56k warning) | 2K05GT | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 16 | 02-18-2008 11:25 AM |
| Challenger Pricing | LSxcellent | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 31 | 12-03-2007 10:00 PM |
| Ontario to become home of the all-new 2008 Dodge Challenger | Mr. Wyndham | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 3 | 08-09-2007 03:54 AM |