The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2009, 07:53 PM   #15
Bocephus
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang GT, Kona, BBP, 3.73
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesh View Post
Well the engine is not a bored over 4.6, its a destroked 5.4. There is also no way they are going to keep it under the price of a Camaro unless you buy the base model with no upgrades. The price difference between the two equally optioned is only $1500 now. I dont think with the new enigne and transmisson you are going to keep the price you are looking for. With the upgrades in drivetrain you are looking at added weight. They gained weight just with a few changes in body panels from last year to this one. The further upgrades, drivetrain and upgraded safety are going to add weight too. I say around 3700lbs for the new Mustang. Once again tho this is all just internet speculation until the numbers are actually done and in print.

Actually it's neither. It's a brand new engine. The GT is still right around 3500-3600.
Bocephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2009, 11:49 PM   #16
Grape Ape
 
Drives: 96 Bronco w/ a 5 speed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bocephus View Post
Actually it's neither. It's a brand new engine. The GT is still right around 3500-3600.
That would be pretty sweet, and I agree that it appears to have different cam covers than the 4.6 or the 5.4.
Grape Ape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 02:25 AM   #17
Hesh
 
Hesh's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IOM Camaro Vin 34334
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 566
Well as far as everyone over on a website recommended here by a few of the ford faithful that use to show up here its a destroked 5.4. It may look a little different then what you are use to seeing being its an all aluminium engine. So im sure it did change a little from the normal 5.4. Also you are right the 2010 GT is between 3500-3600lbs. I was talking about the 2011 with the new driveline. This year gained a little under 50lbs with just a body panel change. With safety regulations, new engine, and tranny the weight will go up.
Hesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 03:23 AM   #18
nester7929
Rice Harvester
 
nester7929's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesh View Post
Well as far as everyone over on a website recommended here by a few of the ford faithful that use to show up here its a destroked 5.4. It may look a little different then what you are use to seeing being its an all aluminium engine. So im sure it did change a little from the normal 5.4. Also you are right the 2010 GT is between 3500-3600lbs. I was talking about the 2011 with the new driveline. This year gained a little under 50lbs with just a body panel change. With safety regulations, new engine, and tranny the weight will go up.
Yeah, but the safety regulations are already in place for the 2010, so the 2011 won't gain weight again by the same regulations.
nester7929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 04:34 AM   #19
Hesh
 
Hesh's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IOM Camaro Vin 34334
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 566
Actually no not all the required saftey features are there. There are some items that are required by no later than 2012 that are not included on the 2010. The side curtain air bags, and the stability control are a few that I noticed. Plus there are new requirements for the roof and side impact that have been increased. I doubt with the optional glass roof that it will meet the new required roll over saftey standard. So yes there is more weight to come from safety requirements.
Hesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 04:55 AM   #20
Supermans
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
 
Supermans's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by nester7929 View Post
Shouldn't weigh much more. It's still an aluminum block, and I'm guessing they just took the 4.6, bored it out and made some other improvements. Shouldn't be a huge weight increase.

Ford probably won't put IRS in. I think I see what Ford is trying to do. They're going to try to make the 5.0 put out around 400-hp, but it will weigh less than the Camaro. They'll keep the live axel to cut costs so they can have a faster Mustang for less than a Camaro.
It makes sense that Ford could have a faster 0-60 Mustang in 2011 than the Camaro and keep the costs down by not offering IRS.. By not having IRS it is actually making those 0-60 times more consistent as well since there is no wheel hop..
__________________
Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266
Supermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 11:51 AM   #21
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supermans View Post
It makes sense that Ford could have a faster 0-60 Mustang in 2011 than the Camaro and keep the costs down by not offering IRS.. By not having IRS it is actually making those 0-60 times more consistent as well since there is no wheel hop..
There isn't supposed to be wheel hop with the Camaro, but that can't be confirmed or denied until we see some performance reviews.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 11:58 AM   #22
GatorBlue371

 
GatorBlue371's Avatar
 
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesh View Post
Actually no not all the required saftey features are there. There are some items that are required by no later than 2012 that are not included on the 2010. The side curtain air bags, and the stability control are a few that I noticed. Plus there are new requirements for the roof and side impact that have been increased. I doubt with the optional glass roof that it will meet the new required roll over saftey standard. So yes there is more weight to come from safety requirements.



im with this guy. People want a new and better Mustang, well its gonna put on weight. Dont be suprised to see a 3800lb mustangs in a couple years.


Which would render any advantage it had over the Camaro useless.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
GatorBlue371 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 11:58 AM   #23
Bocephus
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang GT, Kona, BBP, 3.73
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesh View Post
Well as far as everyone over on a website recommended here by a few of the ford faithful that use to show up here its a destroked 5.4. It may look a little different then what you are use to seeing being its an all aluminium engine. So im sure it did change a little from the normal 5.4. Also you are right the 2010 GT is between 3500-3600lbs. I was talking about the 2011 with the new driveline. This year gained a little under 50lbs with just a body panel change. With safety regulations, new engine, and tranny the weight will go up.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-coyote-v8.html

It's an all new engine. It has a different bore, bore spacing and stroke than either the 4.6 or 5.4. It's a new all aluminum block, completely new heads.
Bocephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 11:58 AM   #24
Kyle2k
LVL 50 Troll Stomper
 
Kyle2k's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supermans View Post
It makes sense that Ford could have a faster 0-60 Mustang in 2011 than the Camaro and keep the costs down by not offering IRS.. By not having IRS it is actually making those 0-60 times more consistent as well since there is no wheel hop..
That's not entirely true, look at this video at 2:39

__________________
Kyle2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 12:31 PM   #25
nester7929
Rice Harvester
 
nester7929's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesh View Post
Actually no not all the required saftey features are there. There are some items that are required by no later than 2012 that are not included on the 2010. The side curtain air bags, and the stability control are a few that I noticed. Plus there are new requirements for the roof and side impact that have been increased. I doubt with the optional glass roof that it will meet the new required roll over saftey standard. So yes there is more weight to come from safety requirements.
I want to say the 2010 already has those.
nester7929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 12:52 PM   #26
KILLER74Z28
MOD SQUAD
 
KILLER74Z28's Avatar
 
Drives: 2G1FT1EW9A9100666
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 5,768
It will be interesting to see what comes of all this… I was under the impression that the 2011 mustang was going to be an all new design; body style and drive train??? That said, it will be interesting to see how the weight is kept down. I’m with Dragoneye, I see the new 2011 mustang close in weight to the Camaro if not slightly lighter (I know I know, let the fan-boys start with the rock throwing…) What I am really interested in is seeing what the new body style is going to look like after the last retro theme (wich I liked by the way). Might give us an idea on what we have in-store for the next gen Camaro.
__________________

Who cares about the Blue Oval crowd and their little Ponys? We're getting our Camaro back-and it'll be Supercharged!-MDAII
Team LS3
KILLER74Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 01:29 PM   #27
nester7929
Rice Harvester
 
nester7929's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLER74Z28 View Post
It will be interesting to see what comes of all this… I was under the impression that the 2011 mustang was going to be an all new design; body style and drive train??? That said, it will be interesting to see how the weight is kept down. I’m with Dragoneye, I see the new 2011 mustang close in weight to the Camaro if not slightly lighter (I know I know, let the fan-boys start with the rock throwing…) What I am really interested in is seeing what the new body style is going to look like after the last retro theme (wich I liked by the way). Might give us an idea on what we have in-store for the next gen Camaro.
They won't change the body style at all, they're just using a new kind of drivetrain.
nester7929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 02:42 PM   #28
truth411

 
Drives: 2022 SS 1LE
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, tx
Posts: 1,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle2k View Post
That's not entirely true, look at this video at 2:39

LMAO!!! Thats some of the worst Axle hop I have ever seen..
truth411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro, Mustang and Challenger road test shots!!!! 91t/a Camaro Photoshops / Renderings Forum 29 11-07-2008 01:03 AM
Comparison Test, by Proxy: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 AirGoya Chevy Camaro vs... 86 07-24-2008 12:20 PM
Turbocharge your way to efficiency.....and power! Mr. Wyndham Forced Induction - V8 20 07-06-2008 01:46 PM
GM moves closer to HCCI engine production Scotsman Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 16 05-16-2008 07:16 PM
2007 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Convertible KILLER74Z28 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 10 04-11-2008 05:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.