|
|
#57 |
|
Reality Check Specialist
|
definitely not a fan of that rear end... the current car is sooooo much better looking, IMO
__________________
got tequila?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |||
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
|
Quote:
i think your mom's pretty.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
The good thing about the Mustang is if you don't like something, there are hundreds of alternatives you could put on instead. I'm sure there will be another set of tail lights that look better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 1999 camaro rs Join Date: May 2008
Location: phoenix, arizona
Posts: 1,160
|
I don't think it will seel good unless its in the 40-45k range, and that rear end is soooo ugly!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Account Suspended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Oh garage... your back and forth Ford fanboy crap makes me laugh.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 95 civic Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 5,796
|
IMVHO i like the v6 mustang over the Gt i wish they made the v6s exterior with the v8 engine
the gt500 looks great cmon z28,zl1 i don't care just make it have 550hp
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | ||
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by garagelogic; 01-11-2009 at 09:48 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
just can't seem to leave
|
Quote:
the GT was kicking Dodge in the doo-dads, and there was no Camaro to compete against, so they went for the Corvette. it's similar in price, similar in power, and has a similar target consumer.http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/..._test/(page)/1
__________________
Eve ('00 FRC): hot-air intake
Rowan ('09 H3): 5spd mom-mobile Penny ('99 Sierra): 5.3 / HD 5spd... gone but not forgotten Samson ('18 HD): compounded 408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
![]() Drives: '04 Mustang GT Join Date: May 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 313
|
I'm with you,i love the GT500 though. When the '05 came out,i thought the plain jane,no spoiler V6 was the best looking of the bunch. I guess the Bullitt is as close as you get,if you're into pretending to be Mcqueen who didn't pretend to be anybody and who personalized all of his cars so i doubt he'd buy a car pre-personalized that copied something somebody else made cool........................eh,did that make sense? I want a Bullitt without it being a Bullitt,but without the GT look. I want a 5.0L LX i guess is what i'm saying. I'm sleepy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
However, there were changes at the VP-level within Ford that saw car-guy and SVT proponent, Chris Theodore, being replaced by Phil Martens who had long believed that niche cars, like the SVT products, were best produced by mainstream engineers and not by a special division. Because of this change SVT lost its budget and product descision-making to Ford Division. With this change, it took no time for the Ford Division bean-counters, who were applying mainstream metrics and processes to SVT's niche-vehicle skunkworks operation, to greatly affect things. This process change forced a series of content reductions (IRS, stability control, interior upgrades, etc.) and approval delays that forced the "Condor" out of a 2006 model-year launch. (thus why there was no "Cobra" version of the S197 Mustang in 2005 or 2006). In fact, Ford Division was seriously looking to abandon the SVT brand built over the previous 12 years and the SVT engineering team, now forced to work within the mainstream vehicle process, was finding it very difficult to maintain a focus on the Condor Mustang. Then, in a brilliant marketing move, Ford struck a deal with Carroll Shelby, who had been involved with SVT on the Ford GT, for the rights to use the GT500 name on the car that SVT had conceived. Enter the 2007 Ford Shelby GT500, previously know internally at Ford as "Condor". Knowing this, you can understand why the car is adorned with both SVT and Shelby's historic icons and branding and, in what I feel was a snub at Ford Division by the SVT team, no blue oval or anything on the car that identifies it as a Ford. It also illustrates why I have always said the MSRP on the car would have been $43K whether or not Shelby ever attached his name to it. Yes, his name on the car did create a stir with enthusiasts and led to dealer ADM's, but that was not in the control of Ford. It was, however, a great marketing move and accomplished exactly what Ford had desired from a partnership with Shelby. It seems the only people who were comparing the GT500 to the Corvette were die-hard GM folks and magazines because no other manufacturer offered a direct-competitor they could put up in a head-to-head comparison to the GT500. And, as anyone would expect, the Corvette beat it in every area except passenger seating. Sorry about the histroy lesson, but I thought it would be an interesting read for anyone who enjoys the stories behind the automobiles that are produced and how things considered no-brainer decisions by you and I, the enthusiasts, don't always happen due to internal politics at the manufacturer. Of all forums, one showcasing the new Camaro should understand. Can you say Z28? Last edited by garagelogic; 01-11-2009 at 10:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
![]() oooooooooooooooook.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A FAKE SCOOP??!! ARE YOU KIDDING ME??!! | MotorCityAgent | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 222 | 03-01-2009 08:17 AM |
| Are they kidding? | Jiu Jitsu Jon | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 17 | 11-20-2008 03:41 PM |