The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2008, 07:34 PM   #15
09'Z28
The "Mad Hamster"
 
09'Z28's Avatar
 
Drives: '71 Camaro, '90 mx5, '71 2002
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
Big, front mounted engine + light body + rwd = corvette.
__________________
09'Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 09:32 PM   #16
socialomar
 
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5
thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur View Post
This is a great first post—welcome to the site.
thank you sir
socialomar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 09:33 PM   #17
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle2k View Post
It would be a TT v6 for sure. I'd love to see a 2700lb corvette with like 400hp...even if it came from a v6...2ndly expect more hp than that from a TT v6, but anyways the weight to power ratio of my aforementioned numbers would be 6.75, less than .5 away from the current z06.
Umm, you won't save 500 lbs from the aluminum and fibreglass Corvette. The chevy small block weighs as much as many V6's with forced induction. Unless you go crazy with carbon fiber you will have a hard time getting a car as capable as the corvette under 3000 lbs.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 09:39 PM   #18
headpunter
Not That sad..considering
 
headpunter's Avatar
 
Drives: Man
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: the part of washington the capital forgot about.
Posts: 3,745
Send a message via AIM to headpunter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Umm, you won't save 500 lbs from the aluminum and fibreglass Corvette. The chevy small block weighs as much as many V6's with forced induction. Unless you go crazy with carbon fiber you will have a hard time getting a car as capable as the corvette under 3000 lbs.
+1 billion points.
__________________
headpunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 11:19 PM   #19
Kyle2k
LVL 50 Troll Stomper
 
Kyle2k's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by headpunter View Post
+1 billion points.
If i recall correctly I believe the dimensions of the C7 are supposed to shrink by quite a bit. 6 in from the front and back and maybe 4 in on from the sides. Wouldn't that cut down on the metal content of the vehicle?
__________________
Kyle2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 11:22 PM   #20
headpunter
Not That sad..considering
 
headpunter's Avatar
 
Drives: Man
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: the part of washington the capital forgot about.
Posts: 3,745
Send a message via AIM to headpunter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle2k View Post
If i recall correctly I believe the dimensions of the C7 are supposed to shrink by quite a bit. 6 in from the front and back and maybe 4 in on from the sides. Wouldn't that cut down on the metal content of the vehicle?
minamally thats not alot when you are using a tube aluminum frame
__________________
headpunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 11:27 PM   #21
Kyle2k
LVL 50 Troll Stomper
 
Kyle2k's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by headpunter View Post
minamally thats not alot when you are using a tube aluminum frame
Thats a new fact for me, I didn't know the frame was tube aluminum, yeah that would be pretty light then.
__________________
Kyle2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 11:28 PM   #22
headpunter
Not That sad..considering
 
headpunter's Avatar
 
Drives: Man
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: the part of washington the capital forgot about.
Posts: 3,745
Send a message via AIM to headpunter
its hydroformed aluminum
__________________
headpunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 11:50 PM   #23
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Shrinking dimensions won't change the weight of the engine, tranny, or suspension which combine to over 1000 lbs (est). After that there might be another few hundred pounds of items that will weigh the same regardless of external dimensions: seats, stereo, etc. After that, things break down to being more or less a function of area. Shrinking it down won't save more than 100 lbs. I'd guess maybe 50.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 08:59 PM   #24
MajorTom
 
MajorTom's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 306
The Corvette is plenty light. The Z06 uses aluminum chassis components to make the car lighter. They could expand that to the base models and use it in place of any steel to lighten it up even more.

I love how Motortrend report that it's "Good news" that there's no talk of mounting the engine in the middle. I remember a year or so ago when they made an article saying how it'd be the best thing for it to put the engine in the middle.

I like reading some car magazines. But from my experience of having subscriptions to C&D, MT and R&T... They all pretty much write the same thing. They're all saying it's good news that there's no talk about mid engine corvettes. I'm not debating that, but what I am saying is that dedicated a cover and a big 3-4 page article to the C7 Corvette with their predictions and suggestions of what it should be. According to them of course. It said how it should have some kind of paddle shift manual transmission like in a Ferrari, a higher tech engine (I assume they were suggesting fuel-shutoff. not overhead cams) and a mid engine layout. The whole article was pretty stupid as there was no facts only rumors and suggestions from one guy. Not to mention.

I have to say Car and Driver is my favorite magazine. Their articles are written with the voice that I can relate to the most.
MajorTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 11:12 PM   #25
swifttal
 
swifttal's Avatar
 
Drives: '91 Z-28
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro&T/A View Post
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO V6!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
front engine is good, AWD wouldn't be terrible,but PLEASE, PLEASE, NO V6!!!!!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
Big, front mounted engine + light body + rwd = corvette.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nester7929 View Post
The Corvette already gets good fuel economy.


GMs got a great team right now - they'll figure out how to make it work and still keep it the same corvette that's existed for over 50 years
swifttal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 10:22 PM   #26
MrKrisSullivan
New 2 The "DARK-SIDE"
 
Drives: 2003 Ram HEMI 4x4 Slt 20in
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St. Augustine Florida
Posts: 89
it's been hydroformed since the C5... I'd say they know what there doing...
I didn't know the 'Vette was going to shrink again... It shrank from C5 to C6 and now again... wow put wings on it and it'll probably fly too...
MrKrisSullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LS9 SC old news. Here comes the LSX. 850HP, 840 lb-ft of Torgue 13F20 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 15 09-22-2008 05:35 PM
C7 Concept ...... 2011?? WillInThe04Ranger General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 33 06-22-2008 03:03 AM
GM moves closer to HCCI engine production Scotsman Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 16 05-16-2008 07:16 PM
Yeeha!! 2008 Corvette Gets Big Boosts of Both Power and Torque frodo General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 24 10-02-2007 03:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.