The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2009, 02:34 PM   #15
gto_in_nc
 
Drives: 1997 Jeep Wrangler -for now...
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 67
Well-stated, Oracle. Thank you!
gto_in_nc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 03:08 PM   #16
Mr_Draco


 
Mr_Draco's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 7,344
...

*Scratches head*

For those that ain't well edumacated?
Mr_Draco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 03:42 PM   #17
gto_in_nc
 
Drives: 1997 Jeep Wrangler -for now...
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Draco View Post
...

*Scratches head*

For those that ain't well edumacated?
Ethanol has less chemical energy than gasoline but helps with oxygenation so gasoline burns more completely with a gas/alcohol blend, generally evening things out --especially with rich-running OEM tunes (which intentionally don't aim for complete combustion, preferring engine safety and unburned hydrocarbons over increased efficiency and oxides of nitrogen.)

Some forum members are reporting slight personal gains in fuel ecomony while others are reporting slight drops.

Make more sense?
gto_in_nc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 03:50 PM   #18
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
10% ethanol blend - helps clean the engine and its emissions
85% ethanol blend - possibility for more power but lower mpg
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 04:17 PM   #19
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Let me know if I'm way out in left field on this:

Diesel burns very hot, gasoline burns hot, ethanol burns sorta hot. NOx requires high temperatures to form. In diesels, this is unavoidable. In gasoline engines, there is a NOx spike at the perfect stoich ratio. Traditionally, engines run rich to avoid this. Moderate amounts of cooler burning ethanol will offset the temperature enough to prevent excess NOx. This allows for less fuel to be used (since it no longer needs excess fuel).

Does this make sense to guys 'in the know'?
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 06:56 PM   #20
knowitman
Camaro fan since birth
 
knowitman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoleCat2SSRS2010 View Post
Ethanol requires more fuel consumption always!
In an engine truly designed for ethanol and not gasoline, you can get about the same gas mileage. Even though ethanol contains less BTU/gallon, it's higher octane rating/activation energy allows for a higher compression which helps the engine run closer to it's thermodynamic ideal efficiency meaning that a lower percentage of energy is lost as heat.
knowitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 07:40 PM   #21
The_Stache
SoCal Race Team #13
 
The_Stache's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS:RS:LS3:SW
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowitman View Post
In an engine truly designed for ethanol and not gasoline, you can get about the same gas mileage. Even though ethanol contains less BTU/gallon, it's higher octane rating/activation energy allows for a higher compression which helps the engine run closer to it's thermodynamic ideal efficiency meaning that a lower percentage of energy is lost as heat.
Exactly, the problem lies herein that there is no mass-commercially available vehicle designed to specifically run on e85.

(and running an e85 designed engine on gasoline is just as bad as running a gasoline designed engine on e85)
__________________
A.K.A - Diarmadhi (old handle) - So much to do.. So little money
Owner : Fast-Stache Industries LLC
The_Stache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 08:05 PM   #22
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by diarmadhi View Post
Exactly, the problem lies herein that there is no mass-commercially available vehicle designed to specifically run on e85.

(and running an e85 designed engine on gasoline is just as bad as running a gasoline designed engine on e85)

I still say we should adopt Brazil's setup of 100% ethanol.... aka Gasohol
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 08:17 PM   #23
zebra
just can't seem to leave
 
zebra's Avatar
 
Drives: your mom wild!!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: cold & windy
Posts: 10,625
^^ i almost converted my explorer to do that
__________________
Eve ('00 FRC): hot-air intake
Rowan ('09 H3): 5spd mom-mobile
Penny ('99 Sierra): 5.3 / HD 5spd... gone but not forgotten
Samson ('18 HD): compounded 408
zebra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009, 10:54 PM   #24
RonC
 
Drives: 2010 2SS - RS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by diarmadhi View Post
Exactly, the problem lies herein that there is no mass-commercially available vehicle designed to specifically run on e85.

(and running an e85 designed engine on gasoline is just as bad as running a gasoline designed engine on e85)
Some GM truck and car engines are designed to run on E85. Their computers are specifically setup to moniter the ethanol blend % in the tank and adjust the air fuel ratio required for that blend in the tank at the time. 100% gasoline AFR is set to 14.68 to 1 and 100% ethanol is 9.0 to 1 AFR. E85 is set at 9.7 AFR and 10% is 14.0 to 1 in the flex-fuel truck tuning. The 5.3L truck engines set up for flex-fuel use 36 lb per hour injectors vs. 24 lb per hour without FF. They have to flow much more fuel per hour to produce the same amount of energy (power) in the same length of time. Real world result; a truck that gets 15 mpg on gasoline gets about 11 mpg on E85. My real world results using 10% ethanol blend gets about .5 mpg less than 100% gasoline in my truck with it's computer optimized for best mileage with each fuel.
RonC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 07:34 AM   #25
knowitman
Camaro fan since birth
 
knowitman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonC View Post
Some GM truck and car engines are designed to run on E85. Their computers are specifically setup to moniter the ethanol blend % in the tank and adjust the air fuel ratio required for that blend in the tank at the time. 100% gasoline AFR is set to 14.68 to 1 and 100% ethanol is 9.0 to 1 AFR. E85 is set at 9.7 AFR and 10% is 14.0 to 1 in the flex-fuel truck tuning. The 5.3L truck engines set up for flex-fuel use 36 lb per hour injectors vs. 24 lb per hour without FF. They have to flow much more fuel per hour to produce the same amount of energy (power) in the same length of time. Real world result; a truck that gets 15 mpg on gasoline gets about 11 mpg on E85. My real world results using 10% ethanol blend gets about .5 mpg less than 100% gasoline in my truck with it's computer optimized for best mileage with each fuel.
What diarmadhi is saying is that a car designed to run specifically on E85 will have a higher compression ratio allowing it to run as efficiently as it can. Trying to use gasoline in one of these engines will cause it to knock and ping.
knowitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 12:41 PM   #26
RonC
 
Drives: 2010 2SS - RS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowitman View Post
What diarmadhi is saying is that a car designed to run specifically on E85 will have a higher compression ratio allowing it to run as efficiently as it can. Trying to use gasoline in one of these engines will cause it to knock and ping.

Yes, an engine designed for E85 or 100% ethanol would be set up a lot different and could make more HP efficiently. However, it still would cost more per mile using E85 than gasoline because of its lower BTU output with the prices we have today.

The answer to the OP's question is; "in theory using 10% ethanol mix does not have the energy output of gasoline so it should get less mileage", however any real world effect on HP and mileage could vary because of engine tuning, driving habits, etc. IMO. Just try it and see for yourself, it won't hurt it.
RonC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 10:10 PM   #27
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylepo View Post
source? Now can that mid range be put in a regular GAS er?
can't remember where, but to answer your second question (I skiped it for some reason) it can be run with higher amounts of ethanol, but it is NOT recommended and probably reduces engine life.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.