|
|
#169 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RJT/L99 Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,151
|
Ah, you beat me to it.
__________________
2SS/RJT/L99
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RJT/L99 Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,151
|
Not going to happen with Fiat....but if they dropped the Challenger and made the Charger the two door it should have been in the first place....I think they would have a huge hit.
The Charger is scheduled for a redesign in 2011 I believe...it it was the above version, put me down for one.
__________________
2SS/RJT/L99
|
|
|
|
|
|
#171 | |
|
BOOOOOM MF'R!!
Drives: to Chipotle daily Join Date: May 2009
Location: Flo-Rida
Posts: 3,614
|
That was over a day ago! lol....
Quote:
Anyways I don't expect some fruity foo-foo Italian company like Fiat to understand and embrace American Muscle car culture. I wouldn't be suprised to see the ''muscle cars'' coming out of Dodge disappear at the end of their generation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#172 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RJT/L99 Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,151
|
Quote:
__________________
2SS/RJT/L99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#173 | |
|
BOOOOOM MF'R!!
Drives: to Chipotle daily Join Date: May 2009
Location: Flo-Rida
Posts: 3,614
|
Quote:
The real KILLER imo is the price. Camaro SS - 426hp - 32k Mustang GT 5.0 - 400hp - 31k? Challenger SRT - 425hp - 43k!!!!! They effectively priced themselves out of a real comparison. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
What I have read, the 200C is coming as is a Alfa Romeo, based on the Challengers LY (shortened wheelbase) platform. The bad, don't expect Hemis, rather turbo 4s and V6s, but they will at least be RWD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#175 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Dodge Ram Megacab & Cobalt SS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boise
Posts: 1,536
|
Quote:
I don't know about that, Fiat has a history of allowing their sub-companies to create their own identities as long as they can make money. It's not like Alfa, Ferrari, and Maserati are known for making fuel sipping mini-cars (Fiat sub-companies). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 | |
|
FASTER!
Drives: Challenger Hellcat, 2SS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,244
|
Quote:
I'm fine with fuel efficient environmentally friendly vehicles as daily drivers. However, I do think we should have options for high performance fast cars if we chose to have them. It seems money will get you anything. Met a guy at a local cruise-in with a Ferrari (can't remember the model) but it was a convertible and newer. At idle the exhaust was quiet...once he hit the gas it got pretty loud. When I asked him about it he said that below a certain RPM the exhaust went through catalytic converters but once you step on the gas, it's bypasses the cats and is just straight exhaust. We all laughed and couldn't figure out how they got that through emissions, but there it was. So I gotta wonder if those type of cars can seem to skirt emissions, why not cars like ours? I'm guessing it has to do with the number sold per year or something, but it's still BS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#177 | |
|
BOOOOOM MF'R!!
Drives: to Chipotle daily Join Date: May 2009
Location: Flo-Rida
Posts: 3,614
|
Quote:
If so i'd say they aren't the best examples.... It seems like the European attitude in general is anti-muscle car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#178 | |
|
FASTER!
Drives: Challenger Hellcat, 2SS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,244
|
Quote:
My R/T listed for a blip over $38K which is still too much, but I bought mine for $33K and change on the "special deal" they had going in Feb. The reason the Challenger still does pretty good even though it weighs 300 lbs more is the torque. My R/T is making nearly maximum torque by 2500 RPM and it stays there until redline. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#179 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Dodge Ram Megacab & Cobalt SS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boise
Posts: 1,536
|
Quote:
Quote:
I get a mixed reading on the Euro attitude toward muscle- they seem fine with 6.2 litre Mercedes engines, the problem they have with American cars has more to do with their attitude toward Americans. Too brash and unrefined sort of crap. I don't know squat of course, but I'm choosing to remain optimistic since I've allowed pessimism to creep into so many other areas of my life. It doesn't matter anyway- 2012 it all goes BOOM! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#180 | ||
|
BOOOOOM MF'R!!
Drives: to Chipotle daily Join Date: May 2009
Location: Flo-Rida
Posts: 3,614
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#181 |
![]() Drives: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 719
|
WOW! This thread is still going? After reading most all the replies, I still say... Read the first post again. Torque, HP, 1/4 mile times - doesn't matter - find what floats yer boat, buy it, and have fun with it! Any of these cars can be turned into monsters with enough mods and money. Geez, I've seen 750 hp Jeep Cherokees that look completely stock. Regardless of what car you're driving (stock or slightly modded), imagine how you'd feel to get smoked by one of those at a stoplight race (which are stupid)...
__________________
AZ MSCL: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT Premium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#182 | |
|
BOOOOOM MF'R!!
Drives: to Chipotle daily Join Date: May 2009
Location: Flo-Rida
Posts: 3,614
|
love that video |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|