The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > Ask the Camaro Team

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2017, 02:52 PM   #1
OminouSS

 
OminouSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Red Hot track candy
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,092
Software Updates and Lock-in Track Modes

Is it possible to receive programming updates over WiFi or will it always be a trip to dealer?
On that note, is there a possibility we can have a 'lock-in' feature added to menu options for both Engine Mode and Active Handling? There are occasions when I inadvertently hit the selector button when shifting during track driving, causing a program change to PTM or Driving Mode. I'm a tall driver and have found other guys with long limbs to have this problem as well. Why not also allow the car to recall your last setting as a future default so you do not have to fumble through modes when you restart your car on grid? Liability I presume...

Thanks for building me a Porsche Annihilator
__________________
Baby born 11/08/16. Left birthing place 11/25/16. Arrived home 12/6/16: '17 Red Hot ZL1. Stock.
OminouSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2017, 03:21 PM   #2
waterman

 
waterman's Avatar
 
Drives: Grandad's C2 L89
Join Date: May 2017
Location: 20*51.50N 156*29.60W
Posts: 1,711
subscribed.
__________________
2018 ZL1 1LE sw/PDR
waterman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2017, 03:29 PM   #3
Thirty3
 
Drives: SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes.
Posts: 76
As well as locking Rev matching on or off.
__________________
2018 SS 1LE
Thirty3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2017, 07:15 PM   #4
OminouSS

 
OminouSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Red Hot track candy
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirty3 View Post
As well as locking Rev matching on or off.
YUP!
__________________
Baby born 11/08/16. Left birthing place 11/25/16. Arrived home 12/6/16: '17 Red Hot ZL1. Stock.
OminouSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2017, 07:30 PM   #5
wanab
 
wanab's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 ZL1 4300 03/16/2017
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kansas
Posts: 112
Lock launch control settings as your personal default.
__________________
2017 ZL1 Coupe, MBM, A10, PDR, CF Hood Insert, ZL1 matts, 50th Anv. Indoor Cover
wanab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2017, 08:53 AM   #6
Dethsupp0rt
 
Drives: None
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by OminouSS View Post
Is it possible to receive programming updates over wifi or will it always be a trip to dealer?
Please no. That's a security nightmare waiting to happen.
Dethsupp0rt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2017, 01:01 PM   #7
OminouSS

 
OminouSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Red Hot track candy
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dethsupp0rt View Post
Please no. That's a security nightmare waiting to happen.
So is on-line banking. So is checking your Equifax credit score. So is going to a Anthem blue cross doctor. So is shopping at Target. So is having a Yahoo email. So is...

I picture the possibility of choosing your updates like we can for anything else app based on our phones, TV's, hell even my new washing machine can take software updates over wifi.
__________________
Baby born 11/08/16. Left birthing place 11/25/16. Arrived home 12/6/16: '17 Red Hot ZL1. Stock.

Last edited by OminouSS; 09-26-2017 at 01:24 PM.
OminouSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2017, 06:10 PM   #8
Dethsupp0rt
 
Drives: None
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by OminouSS View Post
So is on-line banking. So is checking your Equifax credit score. So is going to a Anthem blue cross doctor. So is shopping at Target. So is having a Yahoo email. So is...

I picture the possibility of choosing your updates like we can for anything else app based on our phones, TV's, hell even my new washing machine can take software updates over wifi.
Except one of these is potentially life threatening.

There are already attack vectors present as it is, so making them more accessible over a wireless network, no matter how innocuous they may seem (e.g. only allowing certain updates to a head unit), is extremely bad practice. They should remain limited to physical access only.
Dethsupp0rt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2017, 01:10 PM   #9
OminouSS

 
OminouSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Red Hot track candy
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dethsupp0rt View Post
Except one of these is potentially life threatening.

There are already attack vectors present as it is, so making them more accessible over a wireless network, no matter how innocuous they may seem (e.g. only allowing certain updates to a head unit), is extremely bad practice. They should remain limited to physical access only.
I appreciate you recognizing that I wanted your opinion. It matters to me. Especially when the safety of the world is at stake. Nobody wants to hop in their $70,000 sports car only to find Al Qaeda slipped in a bad engine tune.
__________________
Baby born 11/08/16. Left birthing place 11/25/16. Arrived home 12/6/16: '17 Red Hot ZL1. Stock.
OminouSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2017, 06:03 PM   #10
Dethsupp0rt
 
Drives: None
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by OminouSS View Post
I appreciate you recognizing that I wanted your opinion. It matters to me. Especially when the safety of the world is at stake. Nobody wants to hop in their $70,000 sports car only to find Al Qaeda slipped in a bad engine tune.
Security's just my job 5 (really 7) days a week. I can understand you/everyone may not have an interest in this field, and that's fine.

PoC attacks on vehicles via wireless have already been done, so it's a little more than "opinion".

al-Qaeda is so two years ago though, so that statement I cannot forgive.
Dethsupp0rt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2017, 09:23 PM   #11
Bobkd
 
Drives: 2018 1ss, 2021 silverado HD
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: wny
Posts: 68
The 18's can do OTA updates in the Mylink. Not sure what they could do though.
Bobkd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2017, 12:11 AM   #12
samsumon

 
Drives: 4 wheels
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dethsupp0rt View Post
Security's just my job 5 (really 7) days a week. I can understand you/everyone may not have an interest in this field, and that's fine.

PoC attacks on vehicles via wireless have already been done, so it's a little more than "opinion".

al-Qaeda is so two years ago though, so that statement I cannot forgive.
Tesla seems to be doing fine
samsumon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2017, 09:33 AM   #13
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by samsumon View Post
Tesla seems to be doing fine
Just because something hasn't happened, doesn't mean it can't happen.

If there exists a data connection, the system can be compromised by an outsider. The only way to make it impossible for vehicle control systems to get hacked wirelessly is if they are completely disconnected from communication points. Which includes not only preventing wireless updates (which is obvious), but also doing things like having no means of communication between say the navigation system and throttle/steering/brakes.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2017, 10:09 PM   #14
h422694
 
h422694's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Z06 7 Spd, 2024 High Country HD
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 441
I agree that if there is no wireless connection, the hack attempt would fail. However the other control modules (ECM, TCM, BCM, etc) would still be connected to a common bus that would allow them to communicate with each other. It would be no different than if you had 4 PCs connected behind a router and then disconnected the router. The PCs could still talk to each other but not the outside world. While Nav gets outside info, I don't think that Nav has the capability to control other driving/control functions(yet).
h422694 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.