NCAA Football Trash Talk Thread....

[Zeus]

Originally Posted by UCF w00t

Thanks for proving my point even further. Getting "voted" in by coaches that don't even do the voting themselves, writers that are always biased, and a statistical computer system is definitely a fair and transparent way of doing things.

?


who would you rather have voting more than the people who watch EVERY game, your grandmother?


Don't make that argument its dumb. The best teams go every year, maybe you'll be there one day. If all the other teams contract swine flu.

[UCF w00t]

Originally Posted by skipj3

Blame the BCS not the colleges.

BCS would be gone if it wasn't for the colleges supporting it.

Originally Posted by shnomac77

Are you a college football fan?

Yes. Hence why I think the BCS is ridiculous. Any TRUE fan of college football (and not their team when it benefits them) would agree that the BCS system sucks.

[UCF w00t]

Originally Posted by Zeus

?


who would you rather have voting more than the people who watch EVERY game, your grandmother?


Don't make that argument its dumb. The best teams go every year, maybe you'll be there one day. If all the other teams contract swine flu.

The coaches hardly watch any games. They're too busy watching film on their next game and taking care of other crap (like, you know, their own team). They don't even fill out the ballots. They usually just have one of their SID guys do it. Ask Steve Spurrier.

[Zeus]

Originally Posted by UCF w00t

The coaches hardly watch any games. They don't even fill out the ballots. They usually just have one of their SID guys do it. Ask Steve Spurrier.

Why would it matter how many games they watched if they arent the ones filling it out?

[skipj3]

Originally Posted by UCF w00t

BCS would be gone if it wasn't for the colleges supporting it.

.

yes you are right and unfortunatly its not going anywhere anytime soon

[UCF w00t]

Originally Posted by Zeus

Why would it matter how many games they watched if they arent the ones filling it out?

Because you then have people with no credibility who still probably didn't watch the games (since they're also busy during football season) filling out the ballots. The idea behind the coaches doing it is that they have knowledge of the game and can be trusted to pick the best teams. Some random SID guy doesn't fit that bill. And besides, EVERYONE is biased. Most coaches/SIDs rank the teams that they play much higher than they should be to help out themselves.

And I love how Urban complained endlessly when he was at Utah and went undefeated and didn't get into the BCS champ game but now it's OK that his old team was in the same situation and his new team benefitted.

[ShnOmac]

Originally Posted by UCF w00t

The coaches hardly watch any games. They're too busy watching film on their next game and taking care of other crap (like, you know, their own team). They don't even fill out the ballots. They usually just have one of their SID guys do it. Ask Steve Spurrier.

Thats a opinion that I highly doubt

[PQ]

Originally Posted by Zeus

skip to 7:45 for the Magic moment

Good 'D' but the receiver should have just cought it.

Too bad Florida couldn't have a 7+ minute highlight vid. of just ranked teams.

If you guys don't think OU could be back again, you're not paying attention.

[UCF w00t]

Originally Posted by shnomac77

Thats a opinion that I highly doubt

Are you a college football fan?

Not opinion, fact. Here's a recent, high profile story that although isn't for the BCS votes, is the same idea. That is actually worse since it was during the offseason when coaches have much more free time.

Some more on the matter...

[PQ]

Originally Posted by UCF w00t

Are you a college football fan?

Not opinion, fact. Here's a recent, high profile story that although isn't for the BCS votes, is the same idea. That is actually worse since it was during the offseason when coaches have much more free time.

Some more on the matter...

Been going on since voting began.

[UCF w00t]

Originally Posted by irpq11

Been going on since voting began.

Yup. But that doesn't make it right. This latest story is just a public admission of a practice that everyone (except shnomac77 apparently) has understood to be happening all along.

[Zeus]

Originally Posted by irpq11

Good 'D' but the receiver should have just cought it.

Too bad Florida couldn't have a 7+ minute highlight vid. of just ranked teams.

If you guys don't think OU could be back again, you're not paying attention.

Bradfords face was priceless lol


We played more ranked teams last year than anyone in the country, thats why we got in with 1 loss.


And I know you guys are a solid team, I just think Texas will beat you guys and they will get in... if you beat them you guys go.

[PQ]

Originally Posted by UCF w00t

Yup. But that doesn't make it right. This latest story is just a public admission of a practice that everyone (except shnomac77 apparently) has understood to be happening all along.

It is pretty bad. Stoops had his brothers and others lowering votes to get OU 'in'.

I think they've ALL benefited at one time or another. Problem is that it's actually become part of the job description when hiring coaches. "Good hire. This guy can really get the 'Support'"

I think the Heisman is a stupid joke and I don't even pay attention anymore.

[UCF w00t]

Originally Posted by Zeus

And I know you guys are a solid team, I just think Texas will beat you guys and they will get in... if you beat them you guys go.

Naw, Texas won't make it past UCF.


















............ man I just woke up from the wierdest dream. What'd I miss?