|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: 1970 Camaro, 2011 Mustang GT, 2011 Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
lol the pill is also trying to say that you can get a 3500 pound s550.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
|
The excuses and anger over there is impressive. They're going to try and say that any automatic Scat Pack vs Automatic GT comparisons will not be legit unless it is one of the automatic Limited Edition auto GTs since that car is the only auto with a Performance Pack, despite it being almost $10,000 more than a normal SP.
FACT: The GTPP is slower in testing and tracking with the same driver than the 1LE around a real track. Fact: The Auto GT and manual GTPP is slower than the automatic Scat Pack Challenger R/T. Even the manual SP is faster than the GTPP since two different vendors couldn't launch the GT and got low 13s out of it. Now the Mustang fanatics have to pin their hopes on the EgoBoast, but it won't be pretty there either |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
|
Quote:
You are so correct.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|