|
|
#225 | ||
![]() Drives: 2012 Ford Focus Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
I know i'll probably never feel the difference of that 80 lbs so im fine with where its at. |
||
|
|
|
|
#226 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: some to distraction Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 627
|
Quote:
Wait for the fall of '15, when Gen-6 Camaro arrives, and let us know how your 3,400 lb...oops, 3,700 lb+ Stang GT trots with an LT1 Camaro. I hear rear view mirrors will be an unnecessary Mustang option. Everything you'll need to see will be out the windshield... Last edited by SEVEN-OH JOE; 06-22-2014 at 12:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#227 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2013 Mustang GT Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#228 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Alot Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
that's kind of cute because they never made a quick mustang gt until 2011.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
![]() Drives: 2015 Cummins Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 594
|
I still want one.
|
|
|
|
|
#231 | |
![]() Drives: 2012 Ford Focus Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
I know you Ford fanboys are upset the Mustang isn't 3,400 lbs but rejecting reality isn't going to fix it. Mustang gained weight because it was on an outdated platform with a solid axle. The Camaro is on an overweight sedan platform designed to handle Austrailian roads. Alpha is designed as a light weight performance platform. If GM doesn't drop the ball, there is no way the 6th gen will gain weight.
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Alot Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
|
87-92 5.0's raped camaros from the same years. Ford went a diff route and dropped pushrod motors (experimented with sohc which turned out to be shit imo), so they got smoked by the F body's for along time. At least mustang never went out of production. That being said, the days of slow mustangs are over. I expect the 2015 to be a low 12 sec car.
|
|
|
|
|
#234 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Alot Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#235 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2013 Mustang GT Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#236 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,043
|
Quote:
Now I expect the camaro will lose weight bc it's going to a light chassis, but I don't know if it will be as light as some people think. I have seen some people here say they think it will 3600 pounds. Doesn't a Z51 corvette almost weigh 3500 pounds, I just have a hard time seeing a v8 camaro only being 100 pounds more than corvette. |
|
|
|
|
|
#237 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
Quote:
What did I say that gives you the impression that I'm a fanboy. Quote:
The Corvette and Mustang were already very light. The Corvette is heavier because of the much nicer interior, the LT1 being heavier and a steel torque tube due to the AFM. The Camaro is already overweight due to the platform it's on. I expect the base SS to be 3,650 to 3,750 lbs. |
||
|
|
|
|
#238 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
|
Quote:
Last edited by Q'smuscle; 06-22-2014 at 09:35 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|