2015 Nismo GTR - Page 3

evilstevie · 11-25-2013, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denis

hmmmmm interesting

the big deal is this...

which means the parts you can buy wont get your car capable of running that time. so the time it poseted is pointless. well, not pointless...its an incredable time for sure! but its no longer considered a production car, ya know? for the time to be considered it needs to basically be the exact car you can buy off the showroom floor, although they always add a roll cage which is understandable.

so now you can no longer compair a tuned GTR to a stock Z/28 per say. ya know what i mean?

If you think GM takes their CTS-V's and Corvettes straight off of the showroom floor and runs them around the 'ring, completely untuned and untweaked, and then posts that time...well I've got some fine oceanfront real estate to sell you in Nebraska. That Nissan is fast. Get over it. Massive lie my ass.

MrGood · 12-03-2013, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 87GNX

Best car out there for the money.

+6

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MrGood · 12-03-2013, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycraft

Its still only a overpriced "Nissan"...

But they are fast as hell.....

lol. Better than any Chevrolet.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

shank0668 · 12-03-2013, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrGood

lol. Better than any Chevrolet.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Also twice the price

We'll see if the C7 brings something exciting to the table.

MrGood · 12-03-2013, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shank0668

Also twice the price

We'll see if the C7 brings something exciting to the table.

I'd rather have the gtr than 7 Cs

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Forte · 12-05-2013, 10:53 AM

Other than looking like a car from 2004, sounds great. Horrible aesthetics.

*Camaro_Corvette* · 12-05-2013, 12:35 PM

I fear that some of you that limit yourselves to 3 brands will never understand this car.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denis

looks are subjective. i personally think it looks mean as hell...would i buy it for 200 grand? no. put people will.

Skyline + Nismo + low volume car = Expensive. Will I buy it? No, but I guarantee you there will be plenty of orders to justify building it.

turboguy327 · 12-05-2013, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deki

That thing looks like Satan himself ate a bunch of razor blades and then had explosive diarrhea at 1,000,000 psi of rectal pressure shoot out at it from 3 feet away. I don't care how fast it is, that thing is hideous, and for $200,000 there are much better options out there, and most don't look like that.

Lmao. To bad your pretty much alone with that opinion... It's a amazing car and draws eyes everywhere it will go due to its looks.

nicko524 · 12-05-2013, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G-Oil Guy

I saw it. I like it. I want it. Rumored price is 200k. Damnit.

Spartan01 · 12-05-2013, 02:21 PM

Any car, regardles of make, model, etc that has its poertrain warranty voided by using the built in launch control feature is a P.O.S. backed by a P.O.S company.
And $200 K? Seriously? That is Lamborghini territory.

turboguy327 · 12-05-2013, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartan01

Any car, regardles of make, model, etc that has its poertrain warranty voided by using the built in launch control feature is a P.O.S. backed by a P.O.S company.
And $200 K? Seriously? That is Lamborghini territory.

Well it is past Lamborghini in performance terms..... And the issues they had early on where forgotten about. Even by most owners of the early cars.

Denis · 12-10-2013, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trademaster

They didn't run a cage in this car as you can clearly see in the video.

If the suspension is adjustable, then tuning it for the track you're running is what everyone will do, no? The article isn't really clear. Are they talking about an engine tune? If that's the case, you don't really change much for different tracks in an engine tune. . . I wish there was more clarity here.

i didnt watch the video.

yea, the info is kinda lacking.

Quote:

Originally Posted by evilstevie

If you think GM takes their CTS-V's and Corvettes straight off of the showroom floor and runs them around the 'ring, completely untuned and untweaked, and then posts that time...well I've got some fine oceanfront real estate to sell you in Nebraska. That Nissan is fast. Get over it. Massive lie my ass.

ummm...so all the ring times that get posted are all pointless then? guess we should all stop talking about them. Carry on.

Denis · 12-10-2013, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartan01

Any car, regardles of make, model, etc that has its poertrain warranty voided by using the built in launch control feature is a P.O.S. backed by a P.O.S company.
And $200 K? Seriously? That is Lamborghini territory.

yea i never got that. they provide a feature that voids the warranty if used....never understood that.

big hammer · 12-10-2013, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RenegadeSS

That 7:08 time was placed by the prototype, and was mentioned that it ran R compund tires that the production model won't come with. Its an impressive time, but we will se what the production car can do.

there was a bunch of non production equipment to run that time, such as the tires, a reflash for even more power, different spoilers, different suspension.

that time was pretty much a farce.

12-05-2013, 02:21 PM	#38
Spartan01 Drives: Evil Eva, 2010 2SS LS3 Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Falls Church, Virginia Posts: 3,600	Any car, regardles of make, model, etc that has its poertrain warranty voided by using the built in launch control feature is a P.O.S. backed by a P.O.S company. And $200 K? Seriously? That is Lamborghini territory. __________________ "You simply cannot trust quotes found on the internet." -Abraham Lincoln

12-05-2013, 10:53 AM	#34
Forte Drives: 2011 2LT/RS CGM W/ Black Stripes Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Madera, CA Posts: 598	Other than looking like a car from 2004, sounds great. Horrible aesthetics.