The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2013, 08:50 PM   #15
PYROLYSIS
Remember the Charleston 9
 
PYROLYSIS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2004 KME PREDATOR, 2014 2SS/RS/1LE
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summerv1LE SC
Posts: 5,381
Is the CTSV with the LSA still being built with the older body style for 2014?
__________________
BRING BACK THE B4C POLICE CAMARO!
2002 V-6 5 speed rally red (current camaro) Also driven:1992 Z-28 305 auto Red w/ black stripes (anniversary), 2001 V-6 auto light pewter metallic,1991 RS V-6 auto Black
PYROLYSIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2013, 09:02 PM   #16
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by PYROLYSIS View Post
Is the CTSV with the LSA still being built with the older body style for 2014?
For some reason, I think it is.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2013, 09:33 PM   #17
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,310
The saddest thing is this only indicates that the V (not V Sport) but V will likely start in the mid 70's. Ouch.....................drooling in anticipation.................but ouch.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2013, 10:00 PM   #18
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
The saddest thing is this only indicates that the V (not V Sport) but V will likely start in the mid 70's. Ouch.....................drooling in anticipation.................but ouch.
Mid 70s might even be a touch low. I would not be surprised if the next CTS-V comes in right around 80 grand. Thats still undercuts the Germans by about 10k.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2013, 12:42 AM   #19
King T

 
King T's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS, 2011 Buick Regal Turbo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,392
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Mid 70s might even be a touch low. I would not be surprised if the next CTS-V comes in right around 80 grand. Thats still undercuts the Germans by about 10k.
True. Had this same discussion on another forum and I said the same thing.

The CTS VSport will start at $59k. Just say that the CTS-V is $20k more than that it will put the price at $79k-$80k. That would still put it cheaper than the competition:
2014 BMW M5-$90,900
2014 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG 4Matic-$92,700
2014 Jaguar XFR-S-$99,000
2014 Audi RS7-$104,900
__________________
King T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2013, 12:52 AM   #20
King T

 
King T's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS, 2011 Buick Regal Turbo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,392
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. iNCREDIBLE View Post
not a fan of the redesign, I love the look of the 2nd gen CTS especially the coupe.
Maybe the redesign will grow on you. The CTS gets better to me every design










__________________
King T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2013, 11:47 AM   #21
MEDISIN

 
Drives: 2011 CTS-V Sedan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Mid 70s might even be a touch low. I would not be surprised if the next CTS-V comes in right around 80 grand. Thats still undercuts the Germans by about 10k.
The base CTS increased 14% over the outgoing model. If the same rate hike applies to the CTS-V we're looking at $75k which as King T points out above is still considerably better than the competition. Also remember that Cadillac's tend to sell for much less than MSRP vs German counterparts. Take the ATS for example. The ATS on average sells for $3,800 (11%) under MSRP, whereas the average 3-series sells for $1,400 (4%) under MSRP. Granted the ATS represents an entirely new segment for Cadillac but the point remains, there's more wiggle room for domestics.
MEDISIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2013, 03:10 PM   #22
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,045
the 14' CTS to me, is one of the most eye catching designs on the road. I love it, I love everything about it. GM completely nailed this one IMO. I hope to be able to own one of these cars one day
shaffe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2013, 03:33 PM   #23
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by NASTY99Z28 View Post
I wonder how much is left in this motor with just a tune? I'm guessing it will gain some but not nearly the same as the ecoboost from ford. Can't wait for someone to add full bolt-ons,race gas and slicks!!!
I don't know what the small turbos on this engine can push this engine to, but I'll tell you right now this thing can go much further. I'd be shocked if it can't.

The thing is based on the LFX 3.6, which has some forged internals like the crank, but is a bit weak in the rod/piston area. These things are strengthened in this engine.

Now, we have already seen someone here do a custom twin turbo job on a basically stock LFX and push it to nearly 600 REAR wheel horsepower before it blew up at the track. Now this owner has gone back and bought stronger internals and the engine should be much stouter.

With that in mind, not to mention the other changes to this new TTV6...I feel like we could see 475 - 500HP and 500+ TQ with just an aggressive tune done and nothing else.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2013, 04:18 PM   #24
matt55

 
matt55's Avatar
 
Drives: CTS-V
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,069
Now that's a good looking car
__________________
10.8@130.8 610 whp, CAI, 2.5, E85, id850 on street tires.
matt55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2013, 10:14 AM   #25
NASTY99Z28

 
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
I don't know what the small turbos on this engine can push this engine to, but I'll tell you right now this thing can go much further. I'd be shocked if it can't.

The thing is based on the LFX 3.6, which has some forged internals like the crank, but is a bit weak in the rod/piston area. These things are strengthened in this engine.

Now, we have already seen someone here do a custom twin turbo job on a basically stock LFX and push it to nearly 600 REAR wheel horsepower before it blew up at the track. Now this owner has gone back and bought stronger internals and the engine should be much stouter.

With that in mind, not to mention the other changes to this new TTV6...I feel like we could see 475 - 500HP and 500+ TQ with just an aggressive tune done and nothing else.
I know it will make power when parts are added into the mix but i was referring more to just a "tune". The ecoboost picks up a ton if power with just a tune.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
NASTY99Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2013, 12:49 PM   #26
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by NASTY99Z28 View Post
I know it will make power when parts are added into the mix but i was referring more to just a "tune". The ecoboost picks up a ton if power with just a tune.
Thats what I said....with just a tune. Read the end again
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2013, 02:18 PM   #27
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
I doubt we'll be seeing the same sort of tune-only gains with this engine vs an Ecoboast. The purpose of Ecoboast is, supposedly, fuel economy. The purpose of this engine is performance -which is why it makes so much more power and torque from the factory. GM already gave it a fairly hot tune to begin with. There will still be gains to be made, but I wouldn't expect to see 500 hp from changing just a few 1s and 0s
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2013, 07:08 PM   #28
King T

 
King T's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS, 2011 Buick Regal Turbo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,392
(Edmunds)
















Quote:
A 420-Horsepower Blast at the Blue and White Roundel

Careening downhill with the gas matted, we bend the 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport toward a tight right-hander that looms large ahead. We quickly transition to full brakes, converting the twin-turbo V6's speed into heat before easing off and steadying the throttle.

Dial in a bit more steering lock, not too much because this is a late apex. Wait, wait, wait to grab the last bit of berm but don't unwind the wheel yet. Feed in some more throttle, touch the next curb on the right and now aim for the left edge of the approaching rise, and if you've done it right the chassis unloads over the crest just as it hits the apex.

This is the Milford Road Course, informally known as the Lutz Ring, at GM's proving grounds in Michigan, and it's one of the most demanding circuits we've ever driven. Every turn is specifically crafted to test the car in several ways simultaneously. Long, oil sump-straining, sustained-g corners. Turning while braking. Accelerating over crests. Bumpstop-crushing compressions. It's on this track that engineers have honed the new CTS in an unabashed attempt to take the BMW 5 Series head on.

5 Series in Its Sights

In the past the CTS was a 'tweener, larger than a BMW 3 Series but smaller than the larger 5 Series. With the entry-level ATS now in Cadillac's portfolio, GM engineers had the freedom to size and position the 2014 Cadillac CTS more squarely against the 5 Series. Thus the 2014 CTS is larger than the outgoing generation, stretching 4.2 inches longer and riding on a 1.2-inch-longer wheelbase. It's longer, in fact, than both the 5 Series and Mercedes-Benz E-Class, with a wheelbase that's right between the two.

Whereas the current 5 Series is derived from its larger 7 Series brother, the 2014 CTS is built on the lighter ATS platform. The result is that the 5 Series is porkier than it should be, and the CTS is more efficient with its mass. It's hard to describe the 3,971-pound CTS Vsport as a light car (it's 300 pounds heavier than the base CTS) but it still undercuts the fat 550i by more than 400 pounds.

You might not recognize the Vsport name as it's new to the CTS model lineup. Fret not, as the Vsport is not intended to be a replacement for the CTS-V. Specifically, it slots between the base V6 CTS variant and the inevitable CTS-V, and has the BMW 550i in its sights, not the M5.

Two Turbos and Eight Speeds

The Vsport's 3.6-liter V6 has had its lungs pumped up with 12 psi of boost by a pair of turbos tucked beneath its cylinder heads. Although sharing its architecture with the normally aspirated version that's found a home in many a GM car over the years, the engine has been comprehensively beefed up for boosted duty.

Direct injection and a short-path liquid-to-air intercooler underpin its 420 horsepower and 430 pound-feet of torque, and it's backed by an all-new paddle-shiftable eight-speed autobox. No manual gearbox is available.

While the Vsport's power eclipses the current 2013 BMW 550i's 400 hp, the refreshed 2014 550i boasts 445 hp. We've only tested the 550i in 400-hp guise, so that's the yardstick for now.

Chassis Prowess

At GM's Milford Proving Ground we strapped our Vbox into the Vsport and tested its chops on the vast black lake. The conclusion from this exercise is that the 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport will be a thorn in the side of the big 5 Series. Not only did the Cadillac cling to the skid pad at an eye-opening 0.95g, it tore out a 69.8-mph slalom performance. Braking, too, was impressive, as the Cad reached a drama-free halt from 60 mph in just 103 feet.

There are some differences in the composition of the tarmac here compared to our usual testing venue in Southern California, and our experience with both sites suggests the black lake is somewhat grippier. Nevertheless, these results from the Vsport humiliate the last 550i we tested by a wide margin.

The Vsport's standard summer tires contribute to this prowess. Run-flat Pirelli P Zero Neros measuring 245/40 in front and 275/35 out back have been snapped onto the Vsport's 18-by-8.5-inch wheels (18 by 9.5 inches in the back). By contrast, BMW upcharges you for summer tires on the 550i, and it suffers the consequences in terms of capability on the base all-season tires. Score one for the home team.

Good tires alone do not a sport sedan make, and the CTS Vsport's chassis brims with sophistication to fully exploit them. Its torque-biasing electronically controlled differential is largely similar to that found on the C7 Corvette, and all Vsports are fitted with GM's latest generation of magnetorheological (MR) dampers.

Power to Weight

Paired to its 20-hp edge over the 400-hp 2013 550i, the Cadillac's weight advantage suggests another ass-whipping is in store for the BMW when it comes to acceleration. It wasn't to be. The Vsport's 5.1-second sprint to 60 (4.8 seconds with one foot of rollout as on a drag strip) pips the BMW by only a tenth.

Oddly, the Vsport's quarter-mile sprint of 13.3 seconds at 106.3 mph couldn't match the 2013 550i, as the Cadillac trailed by a tenth of a second and 2 mph by the time it cleared the stripe. Trap speed is all about horsepower, so something doesn't add up. It could be that German horses are simply stronger. Wouldn't be the first time we've noticed this.

Putting the Pieces Together
The Vsport is certainly rapid, the speed on the MRC stacking up continuously in big chunks with each quick gearchange from the new automatic. The engine's muted purr and flat torque delivery make for deceptively quick progress. This is refined potency, rather than the all-out sturm und drang of the CTS-V. Meanwhile, the Vsport's chassis exhibits poise and alertness, and drives smaller than it is.

This apparent feat of shrinking is the sign of a capable car, one that's willing to change direction but isn't nervous, and provides reliable intel on the status of grip at both ends of the car through the helm and the seat of your pants.

For sure, the car is doing some of the work for us. The MRC is not an easy circuit to memorize and will not suffer shunts kindly, so we left the CTS's driving mode in the Track setting. This loosens up the stability control and tightens the MR dampers, steering and gearchange schedule to better suit track use, natch, while still providing a safety net if things go wrong. The differential is also busy shuttling torque to influence the car's attitude, and while you can feel the systems at work, they certainly don't neuter the drive.

In fact, the Vsport is one of those cases where the wizardry onboard is an aid rather than a hindrance. The MR dampers keep the car beautifully flat even in hard corners, while still maintaining a resiliency that allows it to soak up berms without becoming unsettled. It follows its intended path with precision, thanks to the fancy diff and electric-assist steering that is at once precise and intuitive.

Uncharted Territory

Among the better-executed interpretations of Cadillac's modern design language to date, the Vsport's sheet metal blends substance with grace. A long cowl-to-front-axle relationship emphasizes the new CTS's rear-drive layout (squint and you might see an E-Class in its proportions). The cabin's theme is similar to that of the ATS, though every surface feels richer and there's noticeably more space. The instrument cluster is reconfigurable, too, similar to that found in the C7 Corvette.

The 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport is taut, crisp and looks the part of a $60,000 car. OK, $59,995 with destination. Spring for the Premium trim level and the Vsport's base price rises to a few shekels shy of $70 grand. This makes the Vsport even dearer than the existing CTS-V, and Cadillac expects some 15 percent of new CTS sales to be Vsport models.

Yet the Vsport is bang-on the price of a 550i and is a more convincing alternative to it than is the CTS-V. Our initial impression is that the Vsport's chassis is up to the task of outshining the 550i, while still allowing room in the CTS range for a truly menacing CTS-V variant. A 'tweener no more; a 'tweener once again.
__________________
King T is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.