|
|
#29 | |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS, 2012 Shelby GT500 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
We can agree not to agree on the S550 mustangs. I guess we will wait until Ford actually releases that generation of Mustangs. The lineup for the S550 will most likely be: Base Ecoboost 4 or 6 cylinder. No SVO. GT Shelby GT500 May be a Mach1 for a Mustang variant. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS, 2012 Shelby GT500 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 87
|
Looks like the anticipation was settled a few hours ago. There will be a Shelby but in GT350 format only (no Cobra) in 2015 with less HP than the current GT500 model. The engine will be based off the current 5.0 engine in NA form.
A GT with more HP(450). The V6 and an Ecoboost (No SVO and I'm surprised both will be offered together below GT model.) The Mach1 may appear in 2016, but not 2015. So the Shelby name will carry but without the GT500 moniker and no Cobra. You are correct with the V6 and Ecoboost versions. And the Mach 1 is still speculation for 2016. So I guess we are both right and wrong. Go figure. http://www.carbuzz.com/news/2013/6/2...-2015-7714918/ Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Remember the Charleston 9
Drives: 2004 KME PREDATOR, 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summerv1LE SC
Posts: 5,381
|
Quote:
__________________
2002 V-6 5 speed rally red (current camaro) Also driven:1992 Z-28 305 auto Red w/ black stripes (anniversary), 2001 V-6 auto light pewter metallic,1991 RS V-6 auto Black |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS, 2012 Shelby GT500 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 87
|
Your right. And this is the second news source stating exactly the same info. Can't always believe what you read on the Internet.
The marketing of a GT350 replacing the GT500 does make some sense depending on what performance objectives this car can do. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,044
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
For one, the 5.8 is too w-i-d-e for the next-Gen's smaller engine bay.
Soooo...if there's a Shelby, it will surely be based on a 5.0-sized block which, in n/a form, will apparently run to 475 hp. If the EcoBoost-4 becomes standard fare, then a base 'Stang will be akin to the SVO Mustang of the mid-'80s...in more ways than one...which contained a LOT more exotica than the pedestrian GT of its time. Maybe Jamal will step in here and 'splain what's gonna happen...maybe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,044
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Opinionated bugger!
Drives: Boss 302, Mazda 2, Praga & Intrepid Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oakville
Posts: 1,897
|
Quote:
Nope, sorry. ;-)
__________________
Follow me on forums everywhere as Fenderaddict2 or my kid on the track and Twitter @fastmyles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS, 2012 Shelby GT500 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
Let me help you out a bit. There was no Internet search in a "desperation" as you claim unless I needed to clarify your response such as Wikipedia, which you referenced to. I do subscribe to some magazines or internet auto publications which "push" breaking or new articles to me. The latest about the GT350 was "pushed" right after one of my responses to you. And yes' I know that you can't trust everything that is written on the Internet. Our original disagreement revolves mostly around referring to the use of "Shelby" and or the "GT500" for the next mustang platform as our differences of opinion. Furthermore, I was giving you other reasons from the past models for why I believe your assessment for the model lineup of the next platform would or may be incorrect, which you interpreted as a "history lesson". The reason I questioned you on the platform ( S197 or S550) was to be sure you were not talking of the current model year (2014) as opposed to the S550 which you took as offensively or stupidity....but I had to do that based on some of your responses. I don't need to comment any further on the "R" model since I believe is irrelevant while Ford is manufacturing the Shelby model and the CobraJet as a Z28 competitor. I too have spoken to Shelby American management and some SVT engineers specifically about our disagreement. To ease your mind, I too have owned an SN95 Cobra(1999), SN197(2009) Shelby Cobra , currently own a 2011 Camaro SS and currently own a 2012 modified Shelby GT500 amongst other mustangs and other current non pony cars. I belong to several mustang and or Shelby/ Cobra organization and served as a regional contact for SVTOA a few years ago. So your ownership of three Shelby's of the S197 platform does not make you an expert. And before you try blasting me back, my ownership and background does not makes me one either. I have to admit that I never attended a Shelby Bash due to my location and lack of a trailer, but plan too do so in the future. However, I do visit the SA facilities every February. In addition, I have been to The Woodward Dream Cruise ( ' 09 through '12) and Carlisle, PA ("11 through "13) to "rub elbows" with some of the SVT engineers and I do stay in contact with some retired former SVT engineers from the SN95 era,specifically John Colletti. It seems obvious to me based your "in the know" and car ownership makes your lineup listing pretty solid in your eyes. I've tried to respect your opinion, right or wrong, but I disagree with some of your information. Again, we will have to wait till a formal announcement comes directly from Ford. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS, 2012 Shelby GT500 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
A manufacturer will not spend $$$$$ on a licensing agreement with another corporation (Shelby as an example) unless there is a return on the investment. Your right, Ford could have an agreement and not use it, but this would be a poor business decision. What will Ford do after 2016 ( I believe that is the renewal year, but I could be wrong) is anyone's guess. But, I seriously doubt Ford will pay for a licensing agreement just to sit on it. The same goes for Shelby America or any other business. Your giving a history lesson on the Gen5 (S197)...stop it! Yes, the Gen6 S550 is moving in a different direction for performance, style, marketing and technology. I won't go there on my full opinion since I know we will disagree. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS, 2012 Shelby GT500 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
I don't know how the Ecoboost will exactly fit in. Drop the V6 or do an "SVO like"model?? With a V6?? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,044
|
Quote:
This is all based on assumptions/rumor mill type stuff. SO ASSUMING, Ford offers a GT350 to compete against the Z/28, that doesn't mean it replaces the GT500. The GT350 would be Ford's answer to the Z/28, a dedicated track car with very few creature comforts. Ford would still need to offer up a Cobra/GT500 high HP car with all the goodies to compete against a ZL-1 Camaro assuming GM keeps that around into the 6th gen. If the GT350 is to compete with the Z/28 it would not replace the GT500 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|