|
|
#29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Love the one you're with Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
right now the 5.0 and the ss are nearly a dead heat. an optional 7.0 in the ss would seal the deal for the camaro and just be a down right sweet car.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
The diff and axles will have to be stronger than an SS, even on a road course. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
well they already easily run a 12.9 with the ls3 and up to 12.5. so an ls7 should hit the 12 flat mark.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
in the supposed quote from GM it said that it does not have the heavy center section and axles from the ZL1.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
that being said if I were buying an LS7 equipped 1ss i would want the heavier diff because i know what i would be doing with it.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Love the one you're with Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
|
If that's your goal then the LS7 in a lighter package should do that. Really though then you are talking about a Z/28 with out the expensive brakes, wheels, and tires. Maybe loose the front splitter and areo package although they may too help at a drag strip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
yeah lose the brakes and shocks. I just don't need those expensive parts for driving around town. the FE4 suspension is plenty adequate for normal driving.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Love the one you're with Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
|
Quote:
Road racers and drag racer unite. You're looking for the same car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
i don't care what they call it to be honest. ls7 ss is fine with me.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
Link? Not true? Or not identical? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() Drives: 14 SS Sedan Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 474
|
This quote states you can drag race the car ....
"This is not simply a straight-line 0-60 drag strip car, although you can use it for that as well." per Mark Ruess (president of GM North America) http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/chev...onference.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '86 Monte Carlo SS Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,119
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
it was in the z\28 forum. i don't feel like reading through hundreds of posts for an already admitted heresay post about it.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|