|
|
#15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,045
|
lets not forget tho that that interior looks patched together at best
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Drives: something faster than you Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: where dem hoes be
Posts: 315
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Love the one you're with Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
|
steering wheel looks like ass
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1998 Nissan, 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 827
|
What's with that massive center stack and tiny screen? Not a Mustang rant btw, lots of cars have that.
Either make the center stack unobtrusive with a small screen, or put a big screen in a big center stack. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
there is going to be an ecgayboost mustang.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
Of course there will be a ton of small screen buyers falsely accusing those with the larger screens of being "wasteful", or "throwbacks", or "Blind", or "Insecure", etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
This is a hackjob, not what the car will actually come with. That is a 2013 fusion steering wheel, no way is that actually going to be the wheel in the mustang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 45th Anniversary 2SS LS3 Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,812
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Drives: 2014 Subaru Forester, 2010 Equinox Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 560
|
The most retarded statement I've seen on this website in a while.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Force RECON
Drives: 2005 Saab 9-5 2.3T Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
I assume the aftermarket would be even better as well by extrapolating your aftermarket logic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mobile Al
Posts: 750
|
The Ecoboost redlines at just 6500. The 5.0 redlines at 6800. It seems like the v6 would rev a lot higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() Drives: 2014 Subaru Forester, 2010 Equinox Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 560
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|