PWA "The Lounge"

[1320junkie]

Originally Posted by pinkcamaro10

Just got an email from my dealer..

"The event code is still 3800 but it is showing that the vehicle is in transit. The code may not go to 4000 like a normal order. We have an SS that I know for sure that has been shipped. That car is still showing 3800 also."

So I'm not sure if that's good or bad.. *please car don't be headed to QC..PLEASE??*

uh ohh pink milk cartons again?

[TAG UR IT]

Spike,

When I said, "Jason" had the first car, I mean Jason Debler. I was informed by Tom that Jason (Debler) changed his interior color option and somehow that bumped his order. I had nothing to do w/ it nor did Tom. It just happened.

Tran does not have a car on order yet.

[pinkcamaro10]

Originally Posted by 1320junkie

uh ohh pink milk cartons again?

yes, we all know how much you loved them!

[CamaroSpike23]

Originally Posted by DGthe3

Scotty's gone out and said stuff about our site in general before. I can't provide links 'cause I don't feel like signing up at 5thGen.

lol

Originally Posted by gtahvit

And the Tran theory doesn't hold up. He currently doesn't have a car on order.
I was under the presumption that he did based on previous misinformation


To be clear, he has bad mouthed Camaro5 publicly. Until now, based on how you read his post, I don't know that he has blasted anyone in particular. And he may not be going after Tag directly. But there is a trend of negative public posts over there from him regarding us. Not a big secret.
trying to look good in their eyes I guess....
Not a big deal really.

And please, nobody go to 5thGen.org and make a fuss. That would not be cool. We don't tollerate Forum wars and will ban you here if anyone goes there to stir the pot.

FORUM WARS!!!!

Originally Posted by TAG UR IT

Spike,

When I said, "Jason" had the first car, I mean Jason Debler. I was informed by Tom that Jason (Debler) changed his interior color option and somehow that bumped his order. I had nothing to do w/ it nor did Tom. It just happened.

Tran does not have a car on order yet.

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.... .....

well you didnt tell me it was THAT Jason. I dont even know who that Jason is....

I know you had nothing to do with getting bumped up. just part of the process. I thought you were referring to Tran when you said that "Jason" had the first CGM on order.


MISINFORMATION!!!!!

[camaro5]

I had Larry Dickman check out 5th gen.org, and Scotty hasn't posted anything bad that he could find.

I'm not a Scotty fan either. He charges bs doc "fees", and argues that it is a genuine concept.

Anyone who has sold new cars for a living, knows it's bs for additional profit.

But nothing in a post search looked bad to Larry...

[Tactical Z]

Originally Posted by 1320junkie

Hey Tact Z

Hello

And is it a state-by-state thing about red lights being illegal in the front of a vehicle?

[1320junkie]

Originally Posted by Tactical Z

Hello

And is it a state-by-state thing about red lights being illegal in the front of a vehicle?

Hmm I don't know but I know it's illegal in quite a few

[Tactical Z]

Do you know if Texas is one of them?

[Mindz]

I'm sure it is. Ask tag about that though.

[Tactical Z]

I found this on a Police forum.

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/psb/new...ue_lights.aspx
In recent weeks we have experienced an increase in telephone calls concerning warning lights on security vehicles. The Private Security Act does not address this issue, however, reference is made to the Texas Transportation Code. Section 547.305, restrictions on use of lights which states:
(a)...
(b)...
(c)a person may not operate a motor vehicle equipped with a red, white, or blue beacon, flashing, or alternating lights unless the equipment is:
(1)used as specifically authorized by this chapter; or
(2)a running lamp, tail lamp, backup lamp, or turn signal lamp that is used as authorized by law.
(3)a vehicle may be equipped with alternately flashing lighting equipment described by Section 547.701 or 547.702 only if the vehicle is:
(1)a school bus.
(2)an authorized emergency vehicle;
(3)a church bus that has the words “church bus” printed on the front and rear of the bus so as to be clearly discernable to other vehicle operators;
(4)a tow truck while under the direction of a law enforcement officer at the scene of an accident or while hooking up to a disabled vehicle on a roadway; or
(5)a tow truck with a mounted light bar, which has turn signals and stop lamps in addition to those required by Sections 547.322, 547.323, and 547.324, Transportation Code.

It says nothing about just plain red L.E.D's in the front but I will.

[1320junkie]

Originally Posted by Tactical Z

I found this on a Police forum.



It says nothing about just plain red L.E.D's in the front but I will.

I wouldn't chance it, just ask a local LEO to be sure

[FenwickHockey65]

Hmm...what did I miss?

[Mindz]

lights include LED's. if red lighting is illegal, then red led's will be as well.

[PQ]

Originally Posted by DGthe3

Bah! Canadians can't watch US programing online.

Ya but you get Snday Ticket and the NFL network better than we do. :(

Of course I get both but pay dearly for it.