2010 Mustang

[Tactical Z]

Ok, maybe I shouldnt call it a land yacht

[Mr. Wyndham]

Originally Posted by ArcAngel

The genisis is not awesome I found it uninspiring when I drove it.

I agree with this. It's a quick car...but...it's not a "whole" car...if that makes sense.

Originally Posted by ArcAngel

yea it ended up that way and for me Mustang won hands down. The IRS and 111 hp difference disk translate into a huge performance dfference (.2 sec) so it came down to usability and creature comforts for the price and interior. Mustang for me wins hands down. Realisticaly I will never take my car to the track those days are over. So I am happy with Mustangs times and the fact that the live axle is almost nonexistant made the car quiet and smooth. I find no negatives with Mustang

Ironically, I started thinking along the same lines...then I went to compare for the things that I need in the car I want: HID lights, uplevel stereo, and cloth seating. The Mustang didn't match for me. And the closest match I had was $1000 more than the Camaro. Plus, I like the style of the Camaro's interior WAY better, and that's more important to me than material appointment (which, though not stellar, isn't "bad"). We've all seen Number 3 stuff two golf bags in the trunk, so I'm not too worried there. And I really like the added refinement the IRS gives the car (performance numbers aside). That ended the comparison for me: Camaro > than Mustang for Dragoneye.

But guess what? I realized that both cars have a place in the market, and niether one needs to 'beat' the other. The Mustang works for ArcAngel...the Camaro works for me...and so it goes for every single member on this site. I say screw the arguments: Drive your car, and wave the flag!
:flag2:

[ArcAngel]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

i find no negatives with the challenger...what a suprise

You mean the charger interior with awsome Chrysler build quality and the fact that it steers turns and drives like the 4k plus that it is with that great mpg as well. Cmon it's the least competant of the 3

[lil_chef]

Originally Posted by ArcAngel

You mean the charger interior with awsome Chrysler build quality and the fact that it steers turns and drives like the 4k plus that it is with that great mpg as well. Cmon it's the least competant of the 3

hopefully it looses a significant amount of weight when it receives the next gen platform

[lil_chef]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

is that what you do while reading my comments?

[ArcAngel]

Originally Posted by Dragoneye

I agree with this. It's a quick car...but...it's not a "whole" car...if that makes sense.


Ironically, I started thinking along the same lines...then I went to compare for the things that I need in the car I want: HID lights, uplevel stereo, and cloth seating. The Mustang didn't match for me. And the closest match I had was $1000 more than the Camaro. Plus, I like the style of the Camaro's interior WAY better, and that's more important to me than material appointment (which, though not stellar, isn't "bad"). We've all seen Number 3 stuff two golf bags in the trunk, so I'm not too worried there. And I really like the added refinement the IRS gives the car (performance numbers aside). That ended the comparison for me: Camaro > than Mustang for Dragoneye.

But guess what? I realized that both cars have a place in the market, and niether one needs to 'beat' the other. The Mustang works for ArcAngel...the Camaro works for me...and so it goes for every single member on this site. I say screw the arguments: Drive your car, and wave the flag!

:flag2:

This is one of the best posts on here. These cars all work differently for different people. Everyone should get that. Bravo. Ps I get hids too

[ArcAngel]

Originally Posted by lil_chef

is that what you do while reading my comments?

Oooooooooh shit!

[djsnoflake]

Wow this thread is still going?

[djsnoflake]

Originally Posted by lil_chef

is that what you do while reading my comments?

.....................

[fdjizm]

[ArcAngel]

Originally Posted by djsnoflake

Wow this thread is still going?

Yes it is it proves that if people keep the disucussion mature and relevant it can go and be Interesting

[ArcAngel]

Originally Posted by djsnoflake

.....................

Say what?LOL

[Supermans]

Originally Posted by ArcAngel

The genisis is not awesome I found it uninspiring when I drove it. The challenger is a nice car but I'd does feel hefty and I hate the steering wheel. The camaros interior and I do not get along and the trunk and quality issues bug me. I also dislike the non available gadgets for the price. For me Driving both the camaro and mustang was fun and fast. The stang felt lighter and more tossable. It also felt just as fast as the maro. The interior is a win for me and so are the amenities, plus the trunk is more usable. Any questions?

Since you're getting the 2010 Mustang, I say good for you. It is a tough decision and one you will have to live with for awhile. It is true that the Camaro will turn more heads since it is newer for the next couple of years and it is true it is faster than the Mustang and handles better around a track due to the IRS. However with the track pack, the 2010 Mustang becomes quite a competitor and the IRS advantage almost disappears. .2 seconds difference is huge in a race, but not that huge when it comes to how fast the car feels. I'vce owned a 1998 Mustang for 10 years now and it has been a great car all around with minor problems.

The new 2010 Mustang does look a lot better in the front than the 2009 Mustang while the rear became worse.. Since I'll be only seeing the front of your Mustang on the road through my rear-view mirror, that does not matter

[lil_chef]

Originally Posted by ArcAngel

Yes it is it proves that if people keep the disucussion mature and relevant it can go and be Interesting

maturity on the internet?

PFFFFFT