The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2012, 09:26 AM   #43
1ltcap
Banned
 
Drives: 2012 mustanng gt, 1968 chevy camaro
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: home
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by LimaCharlie View Post
All cars in the GS class are production cars except for safety mods and minor suspension/brake modifications. The Camaro runs a factory TR6060 transmission and LS3 (except dry sump). The Mustangs, Porsches, etc. also have near factory drivetrains along with the essential safety/suspension/brake mods. Here's a video about the Stevenson Motorsports GS Camaro:


the mustangs come straight from fords auto alliance plant. they come to you as the purchaser ready to race. including the sealed 5 liter engine. they must run the factory supplied computer, and an air intake restrictor, whereas the camaro runs no intake restriction, is allowed a bosch computer(i though that they came with bosch computers, but the rules specifiying this tell me that they're allowed to use an aftermarket one)

you can walk down to ford, order part number M-FR500-BOSSR1, and you will have a complete mustang ready to race(minus fuel, spare tires, and a professional driver of course).
on these cars, virtually the ONLY thing not built at the auto alliance plant, is the cage.
these mustangs come down the very same assembly line that your neighbors gt will come down. to a point. then it's pulled off, shipped down the road for the cage install, shipped back to the auto alliance plant, where it is assembled the rest of the way by hand.

everything i've been able to find on the camaro gs-r, is that you have to purchase it from chevy, then ship it to riley racing, and they do the race prepping on the car. that's not production.

i wish i'd have seen this post while i was still at home.....for some reason youtube won't open videos on my work computer......i'll have to wait till tonight.

i should add....i think that both the gt500, and the zl1 are amazing cars. the only things i can't like about the zl, are those stupid looking offset rectangle openings below the bumper, where the foglights are. they kill the nose of the car.

Last edited by 1ltcap; 04-24-2012 at 09:45 AM.
1ltcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 10:26 AM   #44
BigHemiSrt
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 07 Dodge Charger SRT8
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In Space
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock36 View Post
My numbers
C6Z 3175/505 = 6.29
GT500 3820/650 = 5.88. ~0.4 lb/hp

Anyway you are using a little bit heavier C6Zand a little bit lighter GT500 that I am. But small variations in weight +/- 20lbs to account for slight differences (ie. ~0.4 or ~0.5 lb/hp) kinda supports my feeling that the margins are small. A full vs. empty tank of gas could swing the weight 50lbs. Anyway, my weight numbers are from Edmunds, though I do know my own C6Z came in at 3181. Granted the '12 could be a bit lighter than the 2011, but I dont have official curb weight specs.

But more importantly, beyond the specific cars in question, when you get into the realm of mid 11s or faster it takes more and more horsepower to gain less and less ET and trap speed, the relationship is less linear as well as other dynamics having a larger effect as well. The difference between a 13lb/hp car and 12lb/hp car is greater than the difference between a 9lb/hp and a 8lb/hp car despite both having a 1lb/hp difference. Im pretty sure you know this, but that is really why I think ~0.4 lb/hp is a slim margin... Not insignificant necessarily, but well within the proverbial "drivers race".

However, the over rev feature does change things I suppose, but how does the feature work? Can it over rev every gear in every situation? If so, and if the over rev feature can be used at will when one pushes it to 7K, then why not just advertise the redline and hp accordingly? If it is like the temporary overboost on some turbo cars then that is has its own considerations too, but I digress...

At any rate not arguing per se, just walking through my reasoning. I dont care enough to turn this into a C6Z comparo since I think the true glory days of this car was 3 or 4 years ago anyway, back when the GT500 still was anchored by an iron block engine. Besides, I agree with the fundamental point that the 2012 GT500 will run 11s anyway.
I see ur points now and i must say i agree.
BigHemiSrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 11:20 AM   #45
LOWDOWN
Downright Upright
 
Drives: Daily
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
Curb Weight/Distribution/Rear Tire Size

2013 Mustang GT 500:

3820 lbs; 56%/44%; 285/35ZR20

2012/13 Corvette Z06:

3199 lbs; 50%/50%; 335/25ZR20 - Michelin Sport Cup (available)

Power-to-Weight is only ONE stat and, if it can't be adequately transferred to the rear wheels, or is applied through less-than-adequate tires, very sophisticated electronics will need to be utilized.

Regardless, an aweful lot is going to be asked of 285 tires...

...and not many folks purchase a Z06 solely to drag race...
LOWDOWN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 11:44 AM   #46
MauriSSio
Banned
 
Drives: 1968 Ford Galaxie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Jose
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOWDOWN View Post
Curb Weight/Distribution/Rear Tire Size

2013 Mustang GT 500:

3820 lbs; 56%/44%; 285/35ZR20

2012/13 Corvette Z06:

3199 lbs; 50%/50%; 335/25ZR20 - Michelin Sport Cup (available)

Power-to-Weight is only ONE stat and, if it can't be adequately transferred to the rear wheels, or is applied through less-than-adequate tires, very sophisticated electronics will need to be utilized.

Regardless, an aweful lot is going to be asked of 285 tires...

...and not many folks purchase a Z06 solely to drag race...
ive seen people work wonders using 275mm tires. Im sure 285's. Something larger would be nicer but not necessary IMHO.
MauriSSio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 11:59 AM   #47
1ltcap
Banned
 
Drives: 2012 mustanng gt, 1968 chevy camaro
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: home
Posts: 115
it's kind of nuts comparing the gt500 to a vette. vettes are in a class all their own for the most part.........
1ltcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 12:21 PM   #48
BowtieBelle
They see me trollin'...
 
BowtieBelle's Avatar
 
Drives: 217 ci of fury; Chauffeured by SS
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 13,875
I love bench racing



__________________
"Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff." -CamaroSpike

2011 Custom LT/RS: Bella's Build Thread
BowtieBelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 12:51 PM   #49
LOWDOWN
Downright Upright
 
Drives: Daily
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by MauriSSio View Post
ive seen people work wonders using 275mm tires.
You're absolutely right...on DRAG RADIALS...

...in fact, in the current issue of Hot Rod Magazine, there's a street-driven FORD PINTO that ran an 8.02 (!!!) on 275 Drag Radials... Yup...with a Chev LS-series engine...the REAL "magic ingredient"...!!!!!!!!!

Last edited by LOWDOWN; 04-24-2012 at 01:25 PM.
LOWDOWN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 12:54 PM   #50
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ltcap View Post
it's kind of nuts comparing the gt500 to a vette. vettes are in a class all their own for the most part.........
that's true. the gt 500 is quite inferior.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 01:01 PM   #51
MauriSSio
Banned
 
Drives: 1968 Ford Galaxie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Jose
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOWDOWN View Post
...the REAL "magic ingredient"...!!!!!!!!!
maybe they figured the ford engine would overpower the tires too much
MauriSSio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 01:29 PM   #52
LOWDOWN
Downright Upright
 
Drives: Daily
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
Just how far is TROLLSVILLE from San Jose? When did you move there?
LOWDOWN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 01:42 PM   #53
MauriSSio
Banned
 
Drives: 1968 Ford Galaxie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Jose
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOWDOWN View Post
Just how far is TROLLSVILLE from San Jose? When did you move there?
ive lived in san jose my whole life. Not sure what that has to do with anything youre really finding way to divert this thread arent you?!
MauriSSio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 01:45 PM   #54
BigHemiSrt
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 07 Dodge Charger SRT8
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In Space
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by MauriSSio View Post
maybe they figured the ford engine would overpower the tires too much
Lol...nice comeback!! U can tell cause now ur being called a troll.
BigHemiSrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 02:33 PM   #55
1ltcap
Banned
 
Drives: 2012 mustanng gt, 1968 chevy camaro
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: home
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by big hammer View Post
that's true. the gt 500 is quite inferior.
DUDE....nearly everything is inferior to a corvette.......but if we compare the gt500 to the zl1......the gt500 wins.
1ltcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.