2010 Mustang - Page 92

ArcAngel · 05-13-2009, 03:39 PM

You only attack what you fear

djsnoflake · 05-13-2009, 03:42 PM

For Sale:

Troll Chow, $20 bucks a post. (I think I could retire off of this forum alone)

Super83Z · 05-13-2009, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArcAngel

I dont understand why you and guys like whitten come in here to bash a car. This is the other car section, and if you read the OP post its about how he likes the way it looks. Your pissing match about how the Camaro is .2 sec faster and blah blah doesnt mean much to anyone beside Camaro Junkies. The average driver who will not take it to the track could care less. You guys are just being rude in an other wise civil discussion between , mustang guys, camaro guys and even 370z guys. So if you can add to the discussion in a good light go post in another thread!

How was I bashing? I said I liked the car just not the back end.

garagelogic · 05-13-2009, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whitten

But to answer your question, read any review of that Mustang including the GT-500 and you will see that the suffers from un planned jumps when loading the suspension in corners, awkwardness to repetitive switches in direction and suffers deeply from the lack of a panhard bar to settle the rear when making transitions.

Uhhh..I hate to be the one to point it out to you, but all of the S197 Mustangs have a panhard bar.

Heck, these's even a picture of the thing earlier in the thread.

Whitten · 05-13-2009, 04:07 PM

fdjizm · 05-13-2009, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garagelogic

Uhhh..I hate to be the one to point it out to you, but all of the S197 Mustangs have a panhard bar.

Heck, these's even a picture of the thing earlier in the thread.

we have already come to the conclusion he has no idea what he is talking about two pages ago when he told me what mileage i get in my own car. I wasn't aware he was driving my car everyday "creepy" :(

ArcAngel · 05-13-2009, 04:09 PM

Thanks garagelogic. So garage have you driven a 2010?

Whitten · 05-13-2009, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fdjizm

we have already come to the conclusion he has no idea what he is talking about two pages ago when he told me what mileage i get in my own car. I wasn't aware he was driving my car everyday "creepy" :(

How the hell do you think you get that kind of mileage?

ArcAngel · 05-13-2009, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whitten

How the hell do you think you get that kind of mileage?

now that's funny LOL

ArcAngel · 05-13-2009, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER74Z28

Very cool. So, how does she run?

I believe I posted a write up a few pages back. I think it was this thread

Super83Z · 05-13-2009, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fdjizm

you guys are dismissing the mustangs handling for a track pack?

Yes because it is a handling package.

garagelogic · 05-13-2009, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArcAngel

Thanks garagelogic. So garage have you driven a 2010?

I'll assume you mean 2010 GT not GT500. If so, then, yes, I had a chance to take one out for a drive a couple of weeks ago. It was a track-pack optioned car, too. I thought the interior was a step up from what I had in my 2005 GT and even in my 2007 GT500. It seemed like a much quieter car that the previous models, too.

As for performance, that's really hard for me to comment on. When you drive a 650+rwhp car every day, almost anything you drive is going to seem lethargic in comparison. However, I will say the car seemed to have a little more grunt running through the gears than I remember my 2005 having. I'd say the overall handling was better than my GT500 was stock and leaps and bounds better than the 2005 GT.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fdjizm

we have already come to the conclusion he has no idea what he is talking about two pages ago when he told me what mileage i get in my own car. I wasn't aware he was driving my car everyday "creepy" :(

Uh oh, I better watch out or the next thing he'll be telling us is that there is no way a 3.73 geared, 650+rwhp GT500 can get 22-23mpg on the highway @ 70mph.

I mean, it's only rated by the EPA at 20mpg stock, right?

fdjizm · 05-13-2009, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whitten

How the hell do you think you get that kind of mileage?

what?

last one is from a forum member on the mustang forums with 4.10's on the highway. Mines are also backed up with a calculator. next time do some research you might not look as bad. what did you say about the 4.6 3v being a garbage engine/weak and horribly inneficient?

checkmate.

ArcAngel · 05-13-2009, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fdjizm

what?

last one is from a forum member on the mustang forums with 4.10's on the highway. next time do some research you might not look as bad.

checkmate.

Bro I think whitten was joking inferring that him driving your car is the reason your gas mileage is good

05-13-2009, 03:39 PM	#1275
ArcAngel Drives: 07 Black Cobalt SS/SC Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Manalapan-NJ Posts: 2,872	You only attack what you fear __________________ Through HIM you believe in GOD, who raised HIM from the dead and Glorified him..

05-13-2009, 04:09 PM	#1281
ArcAngel Drives: 07 Black Cobalt SS/SC Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Manalapan-NJ Posts: 2,872	Thanks garagelogic. So garage have you driven a 2010? __________________ Through HIM you believe in GOD, who raised HIM from the dead and Glorified him..

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
2010 Mustang picture!	Twin Turbo	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	20	11-04-2008 04:01 PM
Exclusive Spy Video: 2010 Ford Mustang	camaro5	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	8	09-01-2008 09:48 PM
Watch out Mustang	darthknight72	Chevy Camaro vs...	34	08-12-2008 07:19 PM
5.0L V8 could return in 2010 Mustang	camaro5	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	15	04-18-2008 07:41 PM

05-13-2009, 04:07 PM	#1279
Whitten Drives: - Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Atlanta Posts: 72