The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2012, 11:19 PM   #15
AZCamaroFan
Camaro6 2016-2018
 
AZCamaroFan's Avatar
 
Drives: sometimes
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 18,468
It's going to weigh 3,300 lbs? with today's safety standards?!

i'll believe that when i see it.
AZCamaroFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 11:21 PM   #16
fielderLS3


 
fielderLS3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Mazda6, 2011 Mustang 5.0
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portage, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by iHasCamaro View Post
Well they are already up to making the Boss 302, which is based in the early 70's. To keep the retro going, they would need to make a new Mustang II which, to hold true to its roots, would need to be based on the Ford Focus, just as the Mustang II was based on the Pinto. So yeah it might be time to quit while they are still ahead.
Are you suggesting that future Camaros will come with an Iron Duke?

Scratch that, it'll be an Ecotec, just like the ATS.

History does have a tendency to repeat itself.
__________________
2022 1SS 1LE (Arrived 4/29/22)
"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive."
. 2022 1SS 1LE (Coming Soon)
fielderLS3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 11:59 PM   #17
09'Z28
The "Mad Hamster"
 
09'Z28's Avatar
 
Drives: '71 Camaro, '90 mx5, '71 2002
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by fielderLS3 View Post
Are you suggesting that future Camaros will come with an Iron Duke?
You never know, that wouldn't be until the 7th gen though
__________________
09'Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 12:38 AM   #18
derklug

 
derklug's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Boss 302
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, Mi
Posts: 1,369
I wouldn't mind a smaller Mustang at all. Mustangs have gotten too big, they need to get smaller and lighter. Going global is all in line with the "One Ford" concept that Mullaly has set forth. Eventually all Ford lines will share common platforms, reducing the cost across the board.
__________________
The biggest mistakes in life come when you know exactly what you are doing.
derklug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 12:41 AM   #19
LimaCharlie


 
LimaCharlie's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS/RS - 2004 Silverado
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,989
This doesn't sound promising to me. I see a small V8 option, V6 option, and a 4 cylinder option. Add the word "hybrid" to the mix and the next Mustang sounds even worse.
I can understand the less interest in retro styling but the global theme makes me think the next Mustang will look like a 2-door Fusion/Taurus.
The sad thing is I see all this happening to the 6th gen Camaro too.
__________________
2011 Summit White Camaro 1SS/RS
-6.2 LS3, TR6060, 3.45, G80

2004 Black Silverado 1500 2WD Regular Cab, Short Bed
-5.3 LM7, 4L60E, 3.42, G80

2014 White Caprice PPV
-6.0 L77, 6L80E, 2.92, G80
LimaCharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 12:42 AM   #20
2010SLVRBULIT


 
2010SLVRBULIT's Avatar
 
Drives: G5(LLT) & C6(LS3)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MARS
Posts: 7,525
it's not just about weight, but aesthetics too. Fugly won't sell.
2010SLVRBULIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 04:20 AM   #21
drummer5679
 
drummer5679's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Infiniti G35
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Carrollton, TX
Posts: 390
if anyone hasn't noticed, new camaros, mustangs, challengers etc.. are absolutely HUGE. like they're monstrous compared to their predecessors. Cutting down on size (and therefore, weight) will improve handling, fuel economy, speed, and so much more.

This is an incredibly good trend.
drummer5679 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 06:19 AM   #22
fielderLS3


 
fielderLS3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Mazda6, 2011 Mustang 5.0
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portage, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer5679 View Post
if anyone hasn't noticed, new camaros, mustangs, challengers etc.. are absolutely HUGE. like they're monstrous compared to their predecessors. Cutting down on size (and therefore, weight) will improve handling, fuel economy, speed, and so much more.

This is an incredibly good trend.
I'd like to see each one of them lose at least 300-400 pounds. 500 in the Challenger's case.
__________________
2022 1SS 1LE (Arrived 4/29/22)
"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive."
. 2022 1SS 1LE (Coming Soon)
fielderLS3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 09:36 AM   #23
Black5thgen
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2007 C6
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,251
3,300 lbs. sounds about right. I would guess the 6th gen will be slightly heavier in the 3,400 lbs. range. The Camaro has always been a but heavier but not as much as the current cars. The gap is ridiculous now. Isn't the Camaro considered a global car right now?
Black5thgen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 10:17 AM   #24
DaBears
 
Drives: 2014 Subaru Forester, 2010 Equinox
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 560
3300lbs isnt that hard of a goal despite safety regulations. Todays new materials are very light and high tech.

I can almost guarantee it will not look like a Taurus/New Gen Fusion. Mustang will keep its own "platform identity" just as it has for most of its life.

Im telling you, its gonna look very futuristic. It will probably not look like any past mustang what so ever. Or any past Ford car for that matter.
__________________
DaBears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 10:21 AM   #25
DaBears
 
Drives: 2014 Subaru Forester, 2010 Equinox
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 560
What did i say about Materials?

Here is your proof guys.

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/13/f...tes-hope-to-s/
__________________
DaBears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 10:23 AM   #26
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,717
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Retro is dead. And buried. Notice how the HHR, PT Cruiser, all those cars are dead.


I don't think it would be such a bad thing to build off of what we have and just morph it like they have always done. Something radical at first but definitely in it's own direction.
__________________
PQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 10:37 AM   #27
kbui

 
kbui's Avatar
 
Drives: 85 Vette, 07 Escalade ESV, 03 GMC,
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBears View Post
What did i say about Materials?

Here is your proof guys.

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/13/f...tes-hope-to-s/


Composite has been looked at since the '90s. There was even an consortium of automakers (ACC) worldwide formed to study composite structures for automotive applications. The biggest problems with composites are 1) high costs and 2) do not have the ductility for energy absorption in a crash. Composite's failure modes are tricky. It's still a big battle to use composites for crashworthiness and it's not going to be easy. Combining composite with aluminum to reduce weight would be great, but keeping the costs down will be difficult. Especially for the hi performance sport/muscle cars in the ~$30K range.
__________________

ADM Performance installed and tuned: Maggie, Stainless Works Power LTs, ADM race cai, ADM ZL1 scoop
Whiteside Customs Super Street 2 Package w/ coilovers
BC Racing Coilovers and lowered, Whiteline Bushings & Swaybars
MBRP catback exhaust, ZL1 bumper conversion, Drake billet shifter, Hurst paddles, NLP rear spoiler, OEM GFX, Vis Racing hood, ASA GT5 wheels
kbui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 10:47 AM   #28
Mr_Draco


 
Mr_Draco's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 7,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer5679 View Post
if anyone hasn't noticed, new camaros, mustangs, challengers etc.. are absolutely HUGE. like they're monstrous compared to their predecessors. Cutting down on size (and therefore, weight) will improve handling, fuel economy, speed, and so much more.

This is an incredibly good trend.
Actually if you look up the dimensions of the previous gen Camaro's and compare them to the 5th gen, you'll see the 5th gen is about the same size wise as the others and only about 100 lb difference. The 5th gen actually isn't the heaviest Camaro either.

Back on track of the Mustang though, the only way I see them reaching the mystical 3,300 lb mark is if they make the body out of carbon fiber. The cost of carbon fiber will easily put such a car out of the price range of most buyers.
Mr_Draco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.