The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > Off-topic Discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-18-2012, 11:05 AM   #15
TOMS1SS


 
Drives: NA
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NA
Posts: 12,126
Two of my neighbors own them. Neither are government workers.
TOMS1SS is offline  
Old 02-18-2012, 11:09 AM   #16
FenwickHockey65
General Motors Aficionado
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2023 Expedition
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,375
Send a message via AIM to FenwickHockey65
Quote:
Originally Posted by shines View Post
Conspiracy between GM and the federal government? Of course not! The feds only owned 61% of the company. LOL!

Whats more is that 16% was given to the UAW, which is little more than a money laundering operation for one of our political parties.

Of course there's collusion between GM and the government. To believe otherwise is idiocy.

Electric cars will do nothing to reduce dependence on fossil fuels so long as we continue to deny construction of nuclear power plants. We're simply relocating the fossil fuel consumption.


__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation
2023 Ford Expedition SSV (State-Issued)
FenwickHockey65 is offline  
Old 02-18-2012, 11:26 AM   #17
TOMS1SS


 
Drives: NA
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NA
Posts: 12,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by shines View Post
Conspiracy between GM and the federal government? Of course not! The feds only owned 61% of the company. LOL!

Whats more is that 16% was given to the UAW, which is little more than a money laundering operation for one of our political parties.

Of course there's collusion between GM and the government. To believe otherwise is idiocy.

Electric cars will do nothing to reduce dependence on fossil fuels so long as we continue to deny construction of nuclear power plants. We're simply relocating the fossil fuel consumption.
How did I miss this one? I love me a good conspiracy theory. BTW I drive by this denial of nuclear power several times a week:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palo_Ve...rating_Station

Used to live by this one too:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_...rating_Station
TOMS1SS is offline  
Old 02-18-2012, 11:54 AM   #18
BATMAN!
Banned
 
Drives: Corvette, F350, Durango but no svt
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 163
Doesnt it cost just as much if not more to charge it as opposed to a gallon or two worth of fuel wich would get you the same distance or furthur?
BATMAN! is offline  
Old 02-18-2012, 12:04 PM   #19
Russell James


 
Russell James's Avatar
 
Drives: '15 SS 1LE, '69 Z28 drag car
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mich
Posts: 4,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by BATMAN! View Post
Doesnt it cost just as much if not more to charge it as opposed to a gallon or two worth of fuel wich would get you the same distance or furthur?
No.

Usage cost, very low. Purchase price is where she's a bit pricey.

A lot depends your commute. If you have about a 30 mile commute, can recharge at night at reduced rates.... it can have really low usage costs. Or a 60 mile commute and can recharge at work.

The feds offered loaned monies to all US automakers to develop alternative energy vehicles. There was a 25B fund, I believe it was in 2009... Ford asked for 11B and got 5.9B.... Just a little trivia for those that think the blue oval didn't take any tax payer money on loan.
Russell James is offline  
Old 02-18-2012, 12:07 PM   #20
BATMAN!
Banned
 
Drives: Corvette, F350, Durango but no svt
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell James View Post
No.

Usage cost, very low. Purchase price is where she's a bit pricey.

A lot depends your commute. If you have about a 30 mile commute, can recharge at night at reduced rates.... it can have really low usage costs. Or a 60 mile commute and can recharge at work.

The feds offered loaned monies to all US automakers to develop alternative energy vehicles. There was a 25B fund, I believe it was in 2009... Ford asked for 11B and got 5.9B.... Just a little trivia for those that think the blue oval didn't take any tax payer money on loan.
Any idea what it cost to recharge it?

That loan is still a hell of a lot different than what GM got.
BATMAN! is offline  
Old 02-18-2012, 12:57 PM   #21
IrocJack


 
IrocJack's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT/RS RJT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,683
I think Chuck Bartowski drives one of these...
IrocJack is offline  
Old 02-18-2012, 01:32 PM   #22
panther2469


 
Drives: 2011 2SS RS SIM Litho # 193
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Hills, CA
Posts: 5,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by BATMAN! View Post
Any idea what it cost to recharge it?

That loan is still a hell of a lot different than what GM got.
I heard about $1.60 to fully charge battery
__________________
panther2469 is offline  
Old 02-18-2012, 02:20 PM   #23
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by shines View Post
Conspiracy between GM and the federal government? Of course not! The feds only owned 61% of the company. LOL!

Whats more is that 16% was given to the UAW, which is little more than a money laundering operation for one of our political parties.

Of course there's collusion between GM and the government. To believe otherwise is idiocy.

Electric cars will do nothing to reduce dependence on fossil fuels so long as we continue to deny construction of nuclear power plants. We're simply relocating the fossil fuel consumption.
You must have a completely different understanding of the word collusion than I do. LOL


col·lu·sion
   [kuh-loo-zhuhn] Show IPA

noun
1. a secret agreement, especially for fraudulent or treacherous purposes; conspiracy: Some of his employees were acting in collusion to rob him.

2. Law . a secret understanding between two or more persons to gain something illegally, to defraud another of his or her rights, or to appear as adversaries though in agreement: collusion of husband and wife to obtain a divorce.

Did the government review the future product portfolio? For sure. And from what we heard, you would probably be shocked at the changes (very few that they were) that resulted. In most cases the government "asked" GM why they weren't pursuing certain products that had historically been hugely profitable. So all we saw were adds back into the portfolio.

Government had some larger plans, we heard internal rumors of a forced merger with Chrysler as part of the overall cash infusion. But those were only rumored.

I'm sure there were discussions that were never discussed or leaked outside the highest levels, but I'm pretty sure they weren't what you think they were. My opinion, but we never saw anything along the lines of what you think happened.

So although you've called me an idiot, I can assure you I'm not.

And you shouldn't worry about fossil fuels. Coal is also a fossil fuel and we have more coal than all the rest of the worlds oil combined. I think we're set.

For some, sounds like you, the issue is dependance on oil. For others, it's emissions. The Volt helps in both cases and until battery technology develops at least another generation or two or three, batteries won't meet all of our transportation needs, they'll only supplement.

But the larger problem isn't the lack of nuclear power plants, it's simply that there are 100 or so million cars still on the road that don't meet modern emissions standards or get resonable fuel economy. The average age of the U.S. automobile is over 10 years old now. Simply take them off the road after 3 years (Japan makes it very expensive to keep a 3 year or older car on the road for example) and see how much improvement there would be.

You could switch every new car to a Volt or Leaf and you'd be years from making a huge dent.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PWA "The Lounge" PART 2 MarkLS2 Off-topic Discussions 111159 01-14-2012 03:25 PM
. SamSS General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 35 09-16-2011 01:38 PM
GM Reveals Chevrolet Volt MPV5 Concept FenwickHockey65 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 33 04-27-2010 05:33 AM
Engadget review of the Chevy Volt monstertodd General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 2 03-30-2010 04:07 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.