The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > Off-topic Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2011, 07:59 PM   #1
Parag

 
Drives: 2010 camaro 2SS LS3
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,334
space shuttle take off like airplanes

why dont the space shuttles just take off from the ground off a runway? it seems easier than the massive fuel and disposable rockets. 747s take off and can fly almost into space with huge amounts of weight, i know the engines wont work without air. but they dont weigh all that much. just a thought i have had for a while now. i would feel alot safer taking off in a airplane than a rocketship.
Parag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 08:06 PM   #2
The Stig
knows 2 facts about ducks
 
The Stig's Avatar
 
Drives: ...and they're both wrong
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The HMS Invincible
Posts: 25,072
I'm just going to give you the short answer because I really don't want to explain the physics. Space shuttles are VERY VERY heavy, so they need a LOT of force to propel them upwards. Then, they need to escape the Earth's gravitational field and the most efficient way to do that is by going the opposite direction of gravity (aka straight up).
__________________
Click to view my build thread
The Stig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 09:43 PM   #3
NavyDood
Retired Navy
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NW of DFW
Posts: 915
http://quest.nasa.gov/qna/questions/...tle_Launch.htm
NavyDood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 10:02 PM   #4
Steve Dallas
Commits weekly crime
 
Steve Dallas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Camano Island, WA
Posts: 9,513
My dream for humanity is that someday we build a Space Elevator. We are actually not that far off from having the technology to do it. It would need to be someplace near the equator. If this was done, the cost of getting into space would be minimal, because all the power could come from the station in orbit at the top of the elevator.

__________________
2017 Camaro 1LT - Blue Barchetta IV
I fire up the willing engine, responding with a roar. Tires spitting gravel I commit my weekly crime.
Steve Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 10:09 PM   #5
Camaro_Corvette
36.58625, -121.7568
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,710
Massive amounts of physics involved, but I think you get the gist(sp?) of it now.
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 10:04 PM   #6
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parag View Post
why dont the space shuttles just take off from the ground off a runway? it seems easier than the massive fuel and disposable rockets. 747s take off and can fly almost into space with huge amounts of weight, i know the engines wont work without air. but they dont weigh all that much. just a thought i have had for a while now. i would feel alot safer taking off in a airplane than a rocketship.
A 747 gets nowhere near space. They fly at about 6 or 7 miles above sea level. The edge of space is about 10x higher than that, and they shuttle orbited at about 3 or 4 times that.

The rockets in the shuttle weren't disposable. After the boosters detatched they fell into the ocean, were recovered & reused on a later mission. The orange external fuel tank for the shuttles main engines was disposable though.

As for why the shuttle takes off vertically vs horizontally, you have to understand that the shuttle, boosters, and fuel tank weigh about 5 times as much as a fully loaded 747. To get the lift required to get such a beast off the ground using wings you would need to have an aircraft substantially larger than the 747, which would again make it heavier requiring a larger aircraft and so on. Assuming it does get off the ground, in order to reach orbit at some point it would have to change over from using the lift of its wings to the thrust of its engines due to the thinning atmosphere. When you change the orientation like that, you have to make everything stronger again, which adds more weight. In the end, to have a single stage to orbit spaceplane that could reach orbit without jettisoning booster rockets or fuel tanks you would have to either make the payload (the stuff you're sending into orbit) so tiny that its not practical, or the spaceship would be so massive that it might require things like a 20 mile long runway carved out of bedrock, and simply building it could cost more than the entire 25 year shuttle program.

That said, there has been a 2 stage airplane-rocket combination that has gone sub-orbital (~60 miles). The airplane took off conventionally, carrying the small 2 man rocket up with it. The rocket was then released and took off, reaching the edge of space.

As for safety ... don't worry too much. Things can just as easily go catastrophically wrong when lifting off horizontally as vertically.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 10:19 PM   #7
trooper182
 
trooper182's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 1LT yellow non RS
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 691
QUESTION:
Why must the shuttle be launched vertically?

ANSWER from Ed Mango on April 3, 1998:
The answer is in the physics. In order to get an object to orbit the earth, it must be travelling at over 17,000 mph. Using today's technology, the only way to generate enough energy to get the shuttle to orbit is with engines that are more powerful then jet engines. Those engines use fuels like liquid oxygen, liquid hydrogen and solid fuels like in a bottle rocket. The Space Shuttle generates about 6,000,000 pounds of energy (thrust) to get the orbiter to orbit at the right speed. There are no known wheels, tires or runways that can handle that much energy. So, we designed the shuttle to launch vertically.
__________________
Staff Sergeant U.S. Army 13B Gun Bunny. 2011 Camaro 1LT A6 Mods: Pypes bomb V8 exhaust, Magnaflow x-pipe, resonator delete, Roto-Fab cold air intake, Vmax Black Ice-olator, Elite Engineering catch can, painted engine cover and fuse box cover, 3dCarbon Front Fender Vents, Street Scene Front Splitter, ZL1 Side Rockers, Anvil Notch Rear Spoiler, interior/engine bay LED lights, two JL Audio W3's 10" and 1000w kenwood amp
trooper182 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 10:19 PM   #8
2ndgenz28
Thread Killer
 
2ndgenz28's Avatar
 
Drives: All Black
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NWO Toledo Area
Posts: 4,720
Send a message via ICQ to 2ndgenz28 Send a message via AIM to 2ndgenz28 Send a message via Yahoo to 2ndgenz28
Just turn the top secret rail gun into a launcher to shoot it into orbit like a balsawood rubber band powered airplane.
2ndgenz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 02:31 AM   #9
Nessal


 
Drives: Exige, Miata, Ghia
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CA, Bay Area
Posts: 2,309
Actually, if I'm correct, the shuttle actually doesn't travel straight up.
Nessal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 03:25 AM   #10
Steve Dallas
Commits weekly crime
 
Steve Dallas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Camano Island, WA
Posts: 9,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nessal View Post
Actually, if I'm correct, the shuttle actually doesn't travel straight up.
You are mostly correct.

Initially, the Space Shuttle was pointed directly up. The shuttle would roll and this roll would place the rudder facing down while the shuttle would change angle from straight up to about 60 degrees in relation to the ground while still in our lower atmostphere. That angle continues to flatten out as it must in order to enter an orbital path.

In order to achieve orbit, it needs to achieve orbital velocity, but that velocity needs change from going straight up into a direction that is tangential to the earths surface.

Rocket science is just that...it's complicated. So many factors are taken into account. Getting to a high altitude quickly is important because of the drag the atmosphere can cause. So though it's not going straight up, it's still going at an angle that will minimize the time spent in the lower atmosphere where drag is an issue. It's one reason that they don't throttle up the engines until later in flight...because the shuttle couldn't take the pressure generated if you were at full throttle.

Virgin Galactic launches its suborbital spacecraft from beneath a plane going horizontally. I haven't seen a mission profile for these craft, but I'm pretty certain they stay fairly level...They just drop from the plane carrying them at high altitude, and are able to accelerate from there.

You can see how the shuttle arcs into space in this video:

__________________
2017 Camaro 1LT - Blue Barchetta IV
I fire up the willing engine, responding with a roar. Tires spitting gravel I commit my weekly crime.

Last edited by Steve Dallas; 11-04-2011 at 03:37 AM.
Steve Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 08:46 AM   #11
CamaroSkooter
Retarded One-Legged Owl
 
CamaroSkooter's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 9,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2ndgenz28 View Post
Just turn the top secret rail gun into a launcher to shoot it into orbit like a balsawood rubber band powered airplane.
...and watch as the crew and payload turn to mush from the ridiculous G-Forces

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas View Post
You can see how the shuttle arcs into space in this video:
When you can no longer see a contrail, is that when the shuttle has reached space or is it just in the upper atmosphere at that point?
__________________

My VIN = 2G1FK1EJ9A9105017
Build Date: 04-23-2009 according to:
http://www.compnine.com/vid.php
CamaroSkooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 09:07 AM   #12
Steve Dallas
Commits weekly crime
 
Steve Dallas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Camano Island, WA
Posts: 9,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSkooter View Post
...and watch as the crew and payload turn to mush from the ridiculous G-Forces



When you can no longer see a contrail, is that when the shuttle has reached space or is it just in the upper atmosphere at that point?
I'm not 100% sure on this, but I would guess that it's still the upper atomosphere. Contrails are water vapor, and the upper atmosphere wouldn't have enough density to form a control. At least, that's my guess.

Also, the white cloudy trail you see early in the launch isn't contrail, but rocket exhaust, so I'm not sure if and when an actual contrail happens.
__________________
2017 Camaro 1LT - Blue Barchetta IV
I fire up the willing engine, responding with a roar. Tires spitting gravel I commit my weekly crime.
Steve Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 09:31 AM   #13
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas View Post
I'm not 100% sure on this, but I would guess that it's still the upper atomosphere. Contrails are water vapor, and the upper atmosphere wouldn't have enough density to form a control. At least, that's my guess.

Also, the white cloudy trail you see early in the launch isn't contrail, but rocket exhaust, so I'm not sure if and when an actual contrail happens.
The huge cloud right at launch isn't exhaust, but it is water vapour. Prior to launch, they begin spraying water beneath the shuttle. When the engines ignite, it turns to steam. I remember hearing that they do this to dampen the roar of the engines.

But in the exhaust itself, some of it is water. After all, the main engines burn hydrogen and when you burn hydrogen you get water. Not sure what exactly the main engines burn but I'm sure they produce some water vapour too.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 12:20 PM   #14
wylde1
I am the Stig
 
wylde1's Avatar
 
Drives: Black w/ IOM stripe 1SS
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saskatoon, SK, CAN
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
The huge cloud right at launch isn't exhaust, but it is water vapour. Prior to launch, they begin spraying water beneath the shuttle. When the engines ignite, it turns to steam. I remember hearing that they do this to dampen the roar of the engines.

But in the exhaust itself, some of it is water. After all, the main engines burn hydrogen and when you burn hydrogen you get water. Not sure what exactly the main engines burn but I'm sure they produce some water vapour too.
I second this. Not to mention that at the exit of the nozzle and some ways past that, there is so much heat and pressure that any moisture in the air is immediately vaporized causing more steam.

The shuttle with it's boosters produces about 37 MILLION horsepower. that's so much HP that if you spread it in a 1 inch thick layer it would cover Germany.
__________________
2010 Camaro - 1SS, Black w/ Orange stripes
wylde1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wow, I know the owner of the car that is faster than the Space Shuttle! Indpowr General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 12 07-06-2011 08:45 AM
SPACE SHUTTLE ATLANTIS JUST LIFTED OFF ON FINAL MISSION AFTER 30YRS!!! "prima"Donna Off-topic Discussions 23 05-19-2010 05:22 PM
Space and the Hubble.... ShnOmac Off-topic Discussions 16 09-10-2009 07:42 PM
2010 Camaro backseat space Richochet83 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 14 04-07-2009 05:34 PM
5th gen Cargo space rray200 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 81 02-05-2008 11:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.