Casey Anthony

[PoorMansCamaro]

there is nothing wrong with a little conversation/debate on a subject people are interested in. No one is getting angry or heated with each other. You want to start a thread about world peace, go for it.

[Banshee]

Ok...so the jury found her not guilty..

I have been a police oficer for 23 years...I can weed out Nancy (Dis)Grace and everything else because I understand the laws of evidence...from experience and being in a courtroom every week since my career began.

The jury got this case dead nuts right. The prosecution did not prove their case. You have 3 standards of evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt is where this conviction needed to be. the prosecution did not meet that standard of evidence and proof.

I understand how your emotions play into this...she is a lying, partying whore who killed her kid. This may so very well be true...but you can't convict someone when the person bringing the charges can't prove their accusations with evidence and testimony.

Example...My dog goes missing. 1 week later, driving down the street a mile from my house, I see my dog in the front yard of a house a mile away, same collar, same tags, he is playing ball with the homeowner.

Can I accuse him of burglary to my home?
Theft?
Can I accuse him of trespass?

Absolutely not...No evidence, no witnesses, no proofs that that man had the intent, capability or opportunity to steal my dog and to permanently deprive.

Casey Anthony? No motive, no cause of death, no witness, no circumstantial DNA.

I completely agree 100% with the jury. My agreement is logical based on intrepertation of law.

By the way...Casey Anthony will have NO life for the rest of her natural life...Do you think she can go anywhere? She is the most hated woman in the United States and likely abroad.

She's living a free hell...and that is one hell of a punishment for those of you who think she got away with murder.

[PoorMansCamaro]

Originally Posted by Banshee

Ok...so the jury found her not guilty..

I have been a police oficer for 23 years...I can weed out Nancy (Dis)Grace and everything else because I understand the laws of evidence...from experience and being in a courtroom every week since my career began.

The jury got this case dead nuts right. The prosecution did not prove their case. You have 3 standards of evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt is where this conviction needed to be. the prosecution did not meet that standard of evidence and proof.

I understand how your emotions play into this...she is a lying, partying whore who killed her kid. This may so very well be true...but you can't convict someone when the person bringing the charges can't prove their accusations with evidence and testimony.

Example...My dog goes missing. 1 week later, driving down the street a mile from my house, I see my dog in the front yard of a house a mile away, same collar, same tags, he is playing ball with the homeowner.

Can I accuse him of burglary to my home?
Theft?
Can I accuse him of trespass?

Absolutely not...No evidence, no witnesses, no proofs that that man had the intent, capability or opportunity to steal my dog and to permanently deprive.

Casey Anthony? No motive, no cause of death, no witness, no circumstantial DNA.

I completely agree 100% with the jury. My agreement is logical based on intrepertation of law.

By the way...Casey Anthony will have NO life for the rest of her natural life...Do you think she can go anywhere? She is the most hated woman in the United States and likely abroad.

She's living a free hell...and that is one hell of a punishment for those of you who think she got away with murder.

So then the jury got the scott peterson case wrong then?

[ssump29]

Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro

you've got it wrong. the investigators already determined that it was a homicide. it was the prosecutors job to link casey to the murder.

You do realize they said that only because of the duct tape and you do also realize how flawed that is, as if a person was duct taped over their mouth does not suffocate them as they are still able to breath out of the nose.

So you see how the duct doesn't prove anything and no the cause of death was never determined.

[Padre]

Originally Posted by Banshee

She's living a free hell...and that is one hell of a punishment for those of you who think she got away with murder.

I do agree with your assessment of the case, but not this. OJ has not been living in hell, and Casey will get millions.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...dia-hollywood/
As Casey Avoids Murder Rap, Will She Cash In?
Casey Anthony likely to face a deluge of offers from tabloids and TV eager to pay millions for her story

Padre

[ssump29]

Originally Posted by Padre

I do agree with your assessment of the case, but not this. OJ has not been living in hell, and Casey will get millions.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...dia-hollywood/
As Casey Avoids Murder Rap, Will She Cash In?
Casey Anthony likely to face a deluge of offers from tabloids and TV eager to pay millions for her story

Padre

OJ was totally different, if you don't remember that was as much as a race case as it was about the murder. Blacks wanted to see him free and even cheered all around the nation when he was not convicted. Here no one is cheering so two different situations and bad example by you.

[Ironheadspearo]

Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro

Just some FYI for you, the body was found in a bag, with duct tape on the face of the skull. Don't think the kid jumped in a bag, in the water, oh, and put duct tape on her mouth...

you must have watched a different case than the one I watched because when the body was discovered the bones were scattered by animals not in a bag and the duct tape was 6 feet from the skull it just happened to match the same shit they had in the house. the bag was found near the body as well but that skeleton was not in a bag when it was found. i listened to the forensic medical examiner describe how everything was found.....

[Ironheadspearo]

isn't OJ in jail as we speak over the mishap with retrieving his heisman trophy?

[Ironheadspearo]

Originally Posted by Banshee

Ok...so the jury found her not guilty..

I have been a police oficer for 23 years...I can weed out Nancy (Dis)Grace and everything else because I understand the laws of evidence...from experience and being in a courtroom every week since my career began.

The jury got this case dead nuts right. The prosecution did not prove their case. You have 3 standards of evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt is where this conviction needed to be. the prosecution did not meet that standard of evidence and proof.

I understand how your emotions play into this...she is a lying, partying whore who killed her kid. This may so very well be true...but you can't convict someone when the person bringing the charges can't prove their accusations with evidence and testimony.

Example...My dog goes missing. 1 week later, driving down the street a mile from my house, I see my dog in the front yard of a house a mile away, same collar, same tags, he is playing ball with the homeowner.

Can I accuse him of burglary to my home?
Theft?
Can I accuse him of trespass?

Absolutely not...No evidence, no witnesses, no proofs that that man had the intent, capability or opportunity to steal my dog and to permanently deprive.

Casey Anthony? No motive, no cause of death, no witness, no circumstantial DNA.

I completely agree 100% with the jury. My agreement is logical based on intrepertation of law.

By the way...Casey Anthony will have NO life for the rest of her natural life...Do you think she can go anywhere? She is the most hated woman in the United States and likely abroad.

She's living a free hell...and that is one hell of a punishment for those of you who think she got away with murder.

+ 1 million there are a couple on here that get it. everyone else is blinded by emotions and believes what the media speculated.

[PoorMansCamaro]

Originally Posted by ssump29

You do realize they said that only because of the duct tape and you do also realize how flawed that is, as if a person was duct taped over their mouth does not suffocate them as they are still able to breath out of the nose.

So you see how the duct doesn't prove anything and no the cause of death was never determined.

Whoa! And how exactly do you know that that was the ONLY reason they determined it was a murder? You don't think that remains of a body in a bag, the discrepancies they found in Casey's testimony, the google searches on her computer for how to make chloroform, etc, lead the investigators to think there was foul play here? And why do people assume that because there was duct tape on the skull, that that is the only way she can die. Just think about it, you put duct tape on someones mouth to keep them quiet. You find a dead body with duct tape on the skull. Are people really suggesting that between the time duct tape was applied to the little girl and the time she died, that she accidently drowned?

BTW, the same laundry bag, plastic bag, and duct tape was found in Casey's home...

[PoorMansCamaro]

Originally Posted by Ironheadspearo

you must have watched a different case than the one I watched because when the body was discovered the bones were scattered by animals not in a bag and the duct tape was 6 feet from the skull it just happened to match the same shit they had in the house. the bag was found near the body as well but that skeleton was not in a bag when it was found. i listened to the forensic medical examiner describe how everything was found.....

on december 11th there were remains of a body found in a bag, on december 15th, more remains were found in the woods around the same area as the first discover. does it really matter if the skull was in the bag or not?

[Future MDPilot]

Originally Posted by Ironheadspearo

+ 1 million there are a couple on here that get it. everyone else is blinded by emotions and believes what the media speculated.

Yay!

[Havok]

You know there is a pretty good theory out there that OJ didn't commit the murders, but rather his son did. OJ tried his hardest to put some evidence on him so that his son wouldn't be tried for it. I believe even the forensic expert (Henry Lee) has defended it.

[Banshee]

Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro

So then the jury got the scott peterson case wrong then?

Prosecution had a strand of hair within a pair of pliers found on a boat that Peterson bought recently and that Laci had never been on and a marina reciept showing he was at that marina a few miles from where her body washed up...

And that peterson had $15k cash, his brothers drivers license, many credit cards from different family members, dyed his hair...

And the fact Scott (Frye testimony) referred to Laci in the past tense several times (direct) that he would be spending the holiday alone...before the murder showing premeditation.

Pererson case is different than this case, and the Simpson case is different than both of those.