|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: Jeep Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tx
Posts: 269
|
C5 Vette vs 392 Challenger
Which is faster in the 1/4 mile, stock vs stock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
It's pretty close, close enough to be a driver's race, but I'd go with the 392.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS/RS - 2004 Silverado Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,989
|
C5 Z06 runs low/mid 12's on a perfect run.
LS1 C5 runs low 13's. Bottom line, the 392 will beat a LS1 C5. A Z06 would probably pull away slowly from a 392 though.
__________________
2011 Summit White Camaro 1SS/RS
-6.2 LS3, TR6060, 3.45, G80 2004 Black Silverado 1500 2WD Regular Cab, Short Bed -5.3 LM7, 4L60E, 3.42, G80 2014 White Caprice PPV -6.0 L77, 6L80E, 2.92, G80 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
392 will be faster, but you could get a like-new C6 for the same price as a 392.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
|
The 392 will walk away from a C5 Vette.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stock 2011 392 Challenger puts down 420 RWHP, 419 RWTQ | ViperTomcat | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 13 | 11-23-2010 10:16 PM |
| My review of the SS (vs Vette, Challenger, Mustang) | vetteman | Chevy Camaro vs... | 45 | 08-03-2009 12:53 PM |
| Challenger Pricing | LSxcellent | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 31 | 12-03-2007 09:00 PM |
| Ontario to become home of the all-new 2008 Dodge Challenger | Mr. Wyndham | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 3 | 08-09-2007 02:54 AM |