|
|
#15 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Gross....very unattractive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
Think again, right now it looks very much like the base version of this will have a naturally aspirated Boxer in either 2.0L or 2.5L trim and will ring for at least base Mustang V-6 money and likely a bit more than that. A turbo Boxer version is almost certainly going to wear a price tag that starts with a three and my guess is that the second number won't be a zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
^ That's will be lame considering you can buy a brand new WRX which has 265 turbo charged horsepower and run's to 60 in 4.7 seconds and runs the 1/4 in 13.4 for only $25k
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
COTW: 12/13/10
Drives: 1969 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,880
|
Quote:
__________________
"Are you one of those boys who prefer cars to women? - I'm one of those boys that appreciates a fine body, regardless of the make." 1969 CAMARO JOURNAL: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341239 | FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/taylor.ryan.apt | GRAPHIC DESIGN: www.aptdesigns.net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2010 Mustang GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 1,823
|
i think thats the plan. originally they were supposed to be sub 20k cars, but toyota decided to take the car to the next level. the engine is planned to be N/A so i would expect 220 ish HP
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
Really they are making it NA? That sucks nuts, I thought it was always suppose to have a 2.0L turbo boxer even during the first econo version. If that's the case who the heck is really going to bust a nut over this car. I thought for once a car company did something right. Id rather have a MX-5 if they made it in a coupe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2010 Mustang GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 1,823
|
yup, definitely N/A for a low-mid 20k car, at that price point the car better be below 3000 LB or i would just choose the 3400 LB 300 HP mustang. the engine will probably be 220 HP and 180 Ft-Lb.
on the FT-86 forums a good chunk of people are disappointed by the engine choice and are hoping for a STI (or toyota equivalent) variant with the turbo version. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2011 Chevy Camaro Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 704
|
If there is a turbo model ill trade my camaro in for it in a second. Well actually I would wait a model year or 2 but a boxer engine sounds way better than a V8 anyday way less common and its lighter with around the same power as a v6 camaro. And it looks amazing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
Hopefully the Subaru version will be more geared for speed and acceleration unlike FT-86 which has a Honda like 220hp 180 Ft-Lb. Oh sorry Honda's NA 4 cylinder rwd S2000 had 237hp and will probably smoke this FT-86. Subaru puts turbos in just about everything they sell so I cant see why they wouldn't put it in their variant and hopefully charge about the same as a 265hp WRX which starts at $25k
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Unofficial Glass Tech
|
i dont see this thing having any less than 280 hp.. it will be more of a competitor to the Genesis coupe than anything else..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||||
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
Less horsepower
Less torque Less displacment Less awd Less doors Less space and More money then the wrx They really screwed this good thing up with their pricing. The base Genesis coupe is a turbo 4 and starts at only $22k, what the heck are they thinking by charging $30k+ for the same thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wow...Toyota mated a Genesis coupe with a Celica GT and tossed in a subie flat-six. I just yawned...
But hey, it will have Toyota's patented NOT OUR FAULT technology package ensuring you are to blame when it suddenly decides to make you the latest Kamikazee Pilot from the far east. Enjoy.
__________________
Cars and women are both going to give you problems...but you can pay somebody else to fix your car!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
You more or less just described a thirty year history of Toyota's strategy for 2-door coupes. Take a look at the MkIV Supra and even the sixth gen Celica for reference. Whatever characteristics Toyota may have lacked over history with regard to their high performance, two door models, ambition wasn't one of them.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GM Reveals Cadillac ULC (Urban Luxury Concept) | FenwickHockey65 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 40 | 11-18-2010 01:39 PM |
| Toyota Hybrids Face Potential U.S. Import Ban on Patent Probe | UCF w00t | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 0 | 10-08-2009 04:33 PM |
| Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2009 04:38 PM |
| Toyota Will Offer a Plug-In Hybrid by 2010 | Mr. Wyndham | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 8 | 01-15-2008 08:49 AM |