You are browsing corvette7 
02-10-2009, 03:41 AM
|
#29 |
|
Banned
Drives: Nissan Titan Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 8,490
|
lolwaitwut?
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 04:01 AM
|
#30 | |
    
Drives: LS3S/C Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 1,344
|
Quote:
__________________
MODS whipple 2.9L s/c, ADM race scoop, 600 rwhp 550 wrtq, .
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 04:59 AM
|
#31 |
|
Banned
Drives: Nissan Titan Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 8,490
|
Lmao I was waiting for someone to comment.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 07:34 AM
|
#32 |
|
Gunning for Sixth
Drives: '03 ZR2 Blazer Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Woodhaven, Michigan
Posts: 9,358
|
TLDRing the thread, but I would honestly pick the Challenger. Why?
1) I hate Mustangs.. (past experiences) 2) I absolutely hate the styling of the Bullitt over the classic. So what if it had a badge delete, CAI, and new grille.. I could do that for less than MSRP. 3) I'd rather die in a Challenger wreck before I step into a Mustang. And that's the honest to god truth. It'll always be Camaro -> Challenger -> '06 Goat -> GM trucks.. IN that order. |
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 08:53 AM
|
#33 |
|
Pillaging Viking
Drives: Saab 9-5 '99 (Hey it's a GM!) Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,189
  |
I voted Bullitt. I really want that car, but I want an SS more.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 11:01 AM
|
#34 | |
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
They did a comparo test of the Bullitt to the SRT and the SRT won.....
.... Not sure why they compared cars almost 10k apart but w/e bullitt all the way here. Quote:
Thats why the GT500 lost... its NOT all about speed. Have to take into account design, quality, uniqueness, etc.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 02:40 PM
|
#35 | |
|
Banned
Drives: Nissan Titan Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 8,490
|
Thats why I decided to make this thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 03:07 PM
|
#36 | |
    Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
Quote:
it might feel faster because it lacks weight but it isnt faster. |
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 03:17 PM
|
#37 | |
|
Drives: LS3S/C Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 1,344
|
Quote:
__________________
MODS whipple 2.9L s/c, ADM race scoop, 600 rwhp 550 wrtq, .
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 03:17 PM
|
#38 |
|
Banned
Drives: Nissan Titan Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 8,490
|
No Kevin, the Bullitt is considerably faster and lighter, make sure you watch that video I posted.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 03:20 PM
|
#39 |
|
Oldbie that nobody knows
|
When they make the Bullitt for the 2010+ Mustang refresh (which they inevitably will), I'm sure it will look splendid.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 03:45 PM
|
#40 | ||
|
Drives: LS3S/C Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 1,344
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
MODS whipple 2.9L s/c, ADM race scoop, 600 rwhp 550 wrtq, .
|
||
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 03:50 PM
|
#41 |
|
Banned
Drives: Nissan Titan Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 8,490
|
Neither have I, thats why I made this one.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 07:47 PM
|
#42 |
|
Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
I will bring back some numbers but they are both even in numbers and it would come down to a drivers race 0-60 but top end the 5.7 and 400'b of tq will beat the bullit.
btw plzz dont use magazines as a comparison because magazine test blow. edit: the multiple sites and drag times I have seen on the bullit it have it 0-60 in 5 flat which is faster than the average RT owners 0-60 which is 5.1-5.3 BUT the 1/4th mile (which was my point) the bullit's tiny 4.6 v8 went 0-60 in mid to high 13s....13.6 in most cases. All they did was paint a gt and put an intake in it...why would you think it would beat an RT with 400+lb of tq in the quarter mile...yet alone an SRT8. Again dont use magazines as they tend to be biased to one brand or another. car and driver got 4.7 0-60 in the SRT8 and in your comparison they got 5.1 for the srt8, see my point. Look up timeslips from actual owners and you will see the RT just has alot more tq than the bullit can handle. Last edited by kevin2323; 02-10-2009 at 07:59 PM. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Challenger Priced | Design1stCode2nd | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 176 | 09-08-2008 08:33 PM |
| Edmunds hangs with a Challenger SRT-8 for the weekend | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 11 | 04-21-2008 01:04 PM |
| 2009 Dodge Challenger Press Release (introducing model lineup) | Tran | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 8 | 03-20-2008 01:47 AM |
| Challenger Pricing | LSxcellent | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 31 | 12-03-2007 10:00 PM |
