|
|
#29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
This is what I saw a couple weeks ago. Supposed to be the same car that ran the 12.4x.
420whp/419rwtq |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
remember that car was an automatic, in the CHallenger specifically that makes a big difference. If I am not mistaken some of the better driver's in R/Ts, such as DodgeTony on stock 4 seasons were able to pull 1.8s-1.9s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
I'm with Evil Twin here, my money says this car is right on top of 430rwhp given the dynos we've seen and track performance thus far. That said, that still puts this thing right on top of LS7 hp territory and arguably this thing may be doing better than the LS7 in the torque department...and the LS7 is a real piece of work. Yeah, I think this car justifies the price, particularly since it is cheaper than the 2011 GT500 and likewise will almost certainly be cheaper than the 2012 Z28.
Also worth thinking about. If they throw this engine at the Charger we'll have a no apologies, rwd performance sedan priced meaningfully below the CTS-V as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
is the edmunds inside line numbers corrected?? because the other srt8 dynoed 420rwhp corrected and 440uncorrected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Probably not corrected. I am not a fan of insideline anyways. ANd I agree around 430 RWHP average looks like what we will be seeing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: CTS-V Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,069
|
One (420 whp sae) was made from a Dynojet
One (453 whp) was made by photoshop or whatever and they say this is what it did , without any other factors that we can see like on the DJ one like SAE cf.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
They are both real, just one is by a "common man" the other is by a well known website. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
no, the insideline one isnt an actual dyno sheet that they print out. It looks like an artists rendering of what the sheet looked like when he saw it. Also, yes, because it has no other info on it it makes it suspicious at the least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 RY 2SS with Custom Stripes Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jennings, La.
Posts: 2,220
|
I am not believing the hp or the 60ft time on stock tires with a 4400lb car!!! Just saying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: CTS-V Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
The InsideLine guys had a ............RED KEY ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
1 n the head,2 n da chest
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
|
me = 400rwhp / 3500lbs = 8.75 lbs/rwhp
`11GT=365rwhp/3650lbs= 10 lbs/rwhp 07gt500= 435rwhp/3920lbs= 9.01lbs/rwhp gen4= 305rwhp/3250lbs = 10.65lbs/rwhp ----stripper i know. SS = 370rwhp / 3780lbs = 10.08 lbs/rwhp 392= 430rwhp / 4200lbs = 9.77 lbs/rwhp 392 needs 480rwhp to hang just even with me. im good. SS needs 432 rwhp to be even. 1998-2002 needs 371rwhp. i have CAI since the dyno so it needs about 490rwhp now. SS needs ~442rwhp. 280lbs and 700 lbs hurts. im not intimidated by it.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
Last edited by assasinator; 12-06-2010 at 06:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 IBM 1SS (Former) Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,031
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Personal Test drive review: 11 GT vs. 11 2SS vs 10 Challenger R/T | ViperTomcat | Chevy Camaro vs... | 171 | 07-27-2010 05:42 PM |
| Challenger Pricing | LSxcellent | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 31 | 12-03-2007 10:00 PM |
| Ontario to become home of the all-new 2008 Dodge Challenger | Mr. Wyndham | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 3 | 08-09-2007 03:54 AM |