The 2011+ Mustang Thread - Page 725

assasinator · 12-13-2010, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JusticePete

I own a Mustang. Am I a trouble maker? :seesaw:

yes you are.

JusticePete · 12-13-2010, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assasinator

yes you are.

No I'm not.

assasinator · 12-13-2010, 10:05 PM

im all smiles and nothing to say.

JusticePete · 12-13-2010, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assasinator

im all smiles and nothing to say.

so how is the weather in Clarksville?

assasinator · 12-14-2010, 08:05 PM

its cold as a mo-fo. 5 degrees last night. i used to live in eastern iowa and thought i left cold like this up there. how is the weather in michigan?

assasinator · 12-14-2010, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by levelbelow2000

I went to the track today with my 2011 5.0 6-speed manual. My car is a Premium 400a. Wanted to get some more 11 sec. timeslips, I got 4 off them. Car was hooking pretty good on the stock 19in Pirellis.
Mods:
*Lethal Performance O/R X-pipe
*Flowmaster Axle-Back
*JLT cai
*Revolution Automotive tune
*UPR upper and lower control arms and Panhard Bar
*BMR lowering springs

1st pass: 12.01@118.01 1.85 60ft.
2nd pass: 11.96@117.69 1.79 60ft.
3rd pass: 11.96@116.42 1.81 60ft.
4th pass: 11.97@119.12 1.82 60ft.
5th pass: 11.98@117.09 1.83 60ft.
6th pass: 12.47@117.24 2.22 60ft.
The last run I tried to get to aggressive with the launch and it spun real bad. Was launching at 2500rpm and seemed to hook real good. I cant believe it pulled 119mph and I was excited about the 1.79 60ft. on stock Pirelli tires.
I did make 2 runs with a set of Nitto 555r 18in drag radials that a friend of mine brought to the track with him. I didnt have good success on them, they spun bad, so I switched back to the Pirellies, go figure.
1st pass: 12.14@117.04 1.98 60ft.
2nd pass: 12.28@116.67 2.02 60ft

http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...l#post10256057

JusticePete · 12-14-2010, 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assasinator

I went to the track today with my 2011 5.0 6-speed manual. My car is a Premium 400a. Wanted to get some more 11 sec. timeslips, I got 4 off them. Car was hooking pretty good on the stock 19in Pirellis.

Mods:
*Lethal Performance O/R X-pipe
*Flowmaster Axle-Back
*JLT cai
*Revolution Automotive tune
*UPR upper and lower control arms and Panhard Bar
*BMR lowering springs

1st pass: 12.01@118.01 1.85 60ft.
2nd pass: 11.96@117.69 1.79 60ft.
3rd pass: 11.96@116.42 1.81 60ft.
4th pass: 11.97@119.12 1.82 60ft.
5th pass: 11.98@117.09 1.83 60ft.
6th pass: 12.47@117.24 2.22 60ft.

The last run I tried to get to aggressive with the launch and it spun real bad. Was launching at 2500rpm and seemed to hook real good. I cant believe it pulled 119mph and I was excited about the 1.79 60ft. on stock Pirelli tires.

I did make 2 runs with a set of Nitto 555r 18in drag radials that a friend of mine brought to the track with him. I didnt have good success on them, they spun bad, so I switched back to the Pirellies, go figure.

Nice slips.

a_Username · 12-14-2010, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assasinator

I went to the track today with my 2011 5.0 6-speed manual. My car is a Premium 400a. Wanted to get some more 11 sec. timeslips, I got 4 off them. Car was hooking pretty good on the stock 19in Pirellis.

Mods:
*Lethal Performance O/R X-pipe
*Flowmaster Axle-Back
*JLT cai
*Revolution Automotive tune
*UPR upper and lower control arms and Panhard Bar
*BMR lowering springs

1st pass: 12.01@118.01 1.85 60ft.
2nd pass: 11.96@117.69 1.79 60ft.
3rd pass: 11.96@116.42 1.81 60ft.
4th pass: 11.97@119.12 1.82 60ft.
5th pass: 11.98@117.09 1.83 60ft.
6th pass: 12.47@117.24 2.22 60ft.

The last run I tried to get to aggressive with the launch and it spun real bad. Was launching at 2500rpm and seemed to hook real good. I cant believe it pulled 119mph and I was excited about the 1.79 60ft. on stock Pirelli tires.

I did make 2 runs with a set of Nitto 555r 18in drag radials that a friend of mine brought to the track with him. I didnt have good success on them, they spun bad, so I switched back to the Pirellies, go figure.

Given your mod list, those are some great times! Any times with the 555r? I'm surprised they didn't work out for ya.

assasinator · 12-14-2010, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a_Username

Given your mod list, those are some great times! Any times with the 555r? I'm surprised they didn't work out for ya.

sorry not my times.... they are someone else's. i wasnt clear. i dont race my car at the track. ill fix the post.

a_Username · 12-14-2010, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by assasinator

sorry not my times.... they are someone else's. i wasnt clear. i dont race my car at the track. ill fix the post.

assasinator · 12-14-2010, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a_Username

i wasnt thinking when i posted it that way. i deserve a facepalm.

if i DO ever run it i will use NT05r's. much better than 555r's.

ULTRAZLS1 · 12-14-2010, 11:36 PM

How do people get 5 to 6 mph trap speed increases with these mustangs with only ~30hp worth of mods? and this is assuming he could have trapped 114 stock...which is also rare

Is weight being taken out and not mentioned? it just doesnt add up.

(highest trap I have ever seen for a 6 speed car stock is 114...he hit 119)

axle back...little gain...x-pipe...wow...and a tune. The car doesnt even have headers. The car really doesnt even have any real performance mods besides the tune. IT is far from full bolt on.

5-6 mph trap increase? that is 50-60hp all things staying equal.

someone educate me. (and I know all about the stock rev limiter...not buying that as the reason)

The car is trapping as fast as ls3 vettes while having no more power to the wheels (ls3 vettes ~390whp) and being 400lbs heavier...once again...educate me.

I know these cars get a lot form the tune while still being on the stock manifolds (such a good design) but this is just odd. I am skeptical to say the least.

THE EVIL TW1N · 12-14-2010, 11:46 PM

Damned near 120mph trap speeds before headers. Even if it had longtubes that is very very impressive!!! The 5.0 is a beast of an engine!!!!!

assasinator · 12-14-2010, 11:51 PM

i dunno. he did mention the back seat being out. but otherwise no weight reductions.

when i was at bowling green watching 2011's with those same mods, they all ran 117-119 mph traps. 410-425rwhp/3600lbs car-3800lbs race weight. they are doing it. i dont know why.

maybe its the first 100 feet. a 5.0 with lca's/uca's can really put it down and hit 1.6x 60' times.

for example here has been my own past experience with mph in that territory.

a car that runs 119mph should ET in the 11.4-11.5 range with ~390rwhp and 3100lbs race weight. keeping the ratios the same, it should take 478rwhp for a 3800lb race weight car to do the same.

he should have run 114mph for a 11.95 time. ideally. IMO.

i guess i should run mine this spring. my Woman will not care for that one bit. its the only way i can know for myself and not be BS.

my next changes are uca/lca's.
the way my car sits today it should be in the 410-415rwhp range.

i have decided to add long tubes to it. im waiting for dyno results from stepped headers. 1 3/4" - 1 7/8" steppers.

View Poll Results: .
Camaro	0	0%
Mustang	0	0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

12-13-2010, 10:05 PM	#10139
assasinator 1 n the head,2 n da chest Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: huntsville al. Posts: 659	im all smiles and nothing to say. __________________ 2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet

12-14-2010, 08:05 PM	#10141
assasinator 1 n the head,2 n da chest Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: huntsville al. Posts: 659	its cold as a mo-fo. 5 degrees last night. i used to live in eastern iowa and thought i left cold like this up there. how is the weather in michigan? __________________ 2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet

12-14-2010, 11:51 PM	#10150
assasinator 1 n the head,2 n da chest Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: huntsville al. Posts: 659	i dunno. he did mention the back seat being out. but otherwise no weight reductions. when i was at bowling green watching 2011's with those same mods, they all ran 117-119 mph traps. 410-425rwhp/3600lbs car-3800lbs race weight. they are doing it. i dont know why. maybe its the first 100 feet. a 5.0 with lca's/uca's can really put it down and hit 1.6x 60' times. for example here has been my own past experience with mph in that territory. a car that runs 119mph should ET in the 11.4-11.5 range with ~390rwhp and 3100lbs race weight. keeping the ratios the same, it should take 478rwhp for a 3800lb race weight car to do the same. he should have run 114mph for a 11.95 time. ideally. IMO. i guess i should run mine this spring. my Woman will not care for that one bit. its the only way i can know for myself and not be BS. my next changes are uca/lca's. the way my car sits today it should be in the 410-415rwhp range. i have decided to add long tubes to it. im waiting for dyno results from stepped headers. 1 3/4" - 1 7/8" steppers. __________________ 2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread	Beau Tie	Chevy Camaro vs...	3644	03-09-2012 08:45 PM
Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro?	5thGenOwner	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	111	12-06-2011 11:06 AM
Official 2011 Mustang GT info released	nester7929	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	81	12-28-2009 04:13 PM

12-14-2010, 11:36 PM	#10148
ULTRAZLS1 Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Jackson, Michigan Posts: 4,418	How do people get 5 to 6 mph trap speed increases with these mustangs with only ~30hp worth of mods? and this is assuming he could have trapped 114 stock...which is also rare Is weight being taken out and not mentioned? it just doesnt add up. (highest trap I have ever seen for a 6 speed car stock is 114...he hit 119) axle back...little gain...x-pipe...wow...and a tune. The car doesnt even have headers. The car really doesnt even have any real performance mods besides the tune. IT is far from full bolt on. 5-6 mph trap increase? that is 50-60hp all things staying equal. someone educate me. (and I know all about the stock rev limiter...not buying that as the reason) The car is trapping as fast as ls3 vettes while having no more power to the wheels (ls3 vettes ~390whp) and being 400lbs heavier...once again...educate me. I know these cars get a lot form the tune while still being on the stock manifolds (such a good design) but this is just odd. I am skeptical to say the least.

12-14-2010, 11:46 PM	#10149
THE EVIL TW1N Banned Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: CA Posts: 2,925	Damned near 120mph trap speeds before headers. Even if it had longtubes that is very very impressive!!! The 5.0 is a beast of an engine!!!!!