The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2010, 02:30 PM   #71
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
I don't know maybe there are changes that need to be made to the chasis or the ssembly line can't easily be made able to handle it so the work gets outsourced, that does not mean they cannot cetify the CHRYSLER V10 for use in the Challenger.
Aside from the facts I've mentioned numerous times before, I believe the UAW disallowing this in their contract would be another stopping point to this 'aftermarket company equipping a Challenger with the Viper V10' rumor.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 02:32 PM   #72
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by v6sonoma View Post
I think the chances of a V10 challenger are slim. Keep in mind MPG's will be a big issue for car manufacturers and big engine low volume cars are gonna be a tougher sell. Even if that doesn't affect the chances things like this will.
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/19/i...inned-alfa-8c/

If they can't even get a true Viper out then the V10 challenger really becomes a stretch.
Talking about a car that would be built in 200-300 units probably total gas mileage is a moot point since there really would not be enough built to even show up on radar. As for that article they admit it is all conjecture on their part and there is no official word that even leads to their conclusions.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 02:33 PM   #73
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
Aside from the facts I've mentioned numerous times before, I believe the UAW disallowing this in their contract would be another stopping point to this 'aftermarket company equipping a Challenger with the Viper V10' rumor.
I doubt the UAW would or could block such a limited production vehicle.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 02:40 PM   #74
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
I doubt the UAW would or could block such a limited production vehicle.
I believe you're wrong. All cars are 'limited production'. UAW has to produce every aspect of all the cars they are under contract for.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 02:49 PM   #75
SuperFly03
 
Drives: 2010 Kona Blue GT500
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 540
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
I believe you're wrong. All cars are 'limited production'. UAW has to produce every aspect of all the cars they are under contract for.
Based on what?

I'm wondering about this because are the SVT guys from Ford UAW guys? I don't know the answer to this.

I believe Dodge could pull off a SRT10 if they wanted, why they would need an outsourced company I do not know.
__________________
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT [TEXAS]

You've been Thread Jacked by SF03!
Current Car: 2010 Kona Blue Shelby GT500 M6
Previous Car:
2010 Black Camaro 2SS/RS M6
Two Back: 2007 Black Shelby GT500 M6
SuperFly03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 03:04 PM   #76
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFly03 View Post
Based on what?

I'm wondering about this because are the SVT guys from Ford UAW guys? I don't know the answer to this.

I believe Dodge could pull off a SRT10 if they wanted, why they would need an outsourced company I do not know.
I'll rephrase.

I believe you're wrong because the UAW has to produce every aspect of all the cars they are under contract for.

That should be clear now.

Technically speaking, Dodge has the best change to pull this off with no help from any other company. However, there is no business case for them to produce this car based on the poor Challenger sales, small market for a SRT8+ 27K Viper engine Challenger, financial problems of Chrysler and it would ruin the exclusive nature of the 2012 Viper.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 04:38 PM   #77
v6sonoma


 
v6sonoma's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS RS
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 8,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Talking about a car that would be built in 200-300 units probably total gas mileage is a moot point since there really would not be enough built to even show up on radar. As for that article they admit it is all conjecture on their part and there is no official word that even leads to their conclusions.
I disagree the Ram srt-10 sold 3,059 units in 2004 4,097 in 2005 and 2,373 in 2006 Which is WAY more than 200-300 and that was for a truck. If they put it in a real performance oriented car such as the Challenger those numbers would rise and that would affect their CAFE. Chryslers MPG's are already the worst of them all so they need raise that a lot or they'll be in trouble. I'm not saying the idea is impossible but it's not at the top of their priority list. Their is a reason why the Z28 isn't out yet. Because GM needed to focus on the important things first then once they get some positive cash flow they can spend money on lower volume products.

As for the article what I was trying to say was that if they are in fact just re skinning the alpha then there's a good chance the V10 you're talking about won't even exist. There was talk in the past of the last gen Viper switching to a V8 so since FIAT is running the show they might just use one of their existing engines. That is of coarse unless Dodge has something already well into development. Who the hell knows. Either way I can't afford it. So I guess all we can do is sit back have a drink and wait and see.
__________________

Mods: BBK Intake, BBK LT's and High Flow Cats, Corsa Cat-back exhaust, Hurst short throw shifter, SLP skip-shift eliminator.

7/1/09 Placed order for IOM/IO int/ SS/RS 6M
9/26/09 Took delivery!
v6sonoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 04:40 PM   #78
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
I'll rephrase.

I believe you're wrong because the UAW has to produce every aspect of all the cars they are under contract for.

That should be clear now.

Technically speaking, Dodge has the best change to pull this off with no help from any other company. However, there is no business case for them to produce this car based on the poor Challenger sales, small market for a SRT8+ 27K Viper engine Challenger, financial problems of Chrysler and it would ruin the exclusive nature of the 2012 Viper.
Challengers are not assembled by UAW employees
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 04:54 PM   #79
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by v6sonoma View Post
I disagree the Ram srt-10 sold 3,059 units in 2004 4,097 in 2005 and 2,373 in 2006 Which is WAY more than 200-300 and that was for a truck. If they put it in a real performance oriented car such as the Challenger those numbers would rise and that would affect their CAFE. Chryslers MPG's are already the worst of them all so they need raise that a lot or they'll be in trouble. I'm not saying the idea is impossible but it's not at the top of their priority list. Their is a reason why the Z28 isn't out yet. Because GM needed to focus on the important things first then once they get some positive cash flow they can spend money on lower volume products.

As for the article what I was trying to say was that if they are in fact just re skinning the alpha then there's a good chance the V10 you're talking about won't even exist. There was talk in the past of the last gen Viper switching to a V8 so since FIAT is running the show they might just use one of their existing engines. That is of coarse unless Dodge has something already well into development. Who the hell knows. Either way I can't afford it. So I guess all we can do is sit back have a drink and wait and see.
My thought is not that would only receive that many orders, but that is how many Dodge will build. As I said a new supercharged or turbocharged 6.4 (backed by the new 8 speed auto) would be my preference. I personally wouldn't many if any of the V10s my self. My point is that they will make it, but that if they could. IMHO it is kind of redundant.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 04:58 PM   #80
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Challengers are not assembled by UAW employees
You are correct.

I believe you're wrong because the CAW has to produce every aspect of all the cars they are under contract for.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 06:21 PM   #81
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
I'll rephrase.

I believe you're wrong because the UAW has to produce every aspect of all the cars they are under contract for.

That should be clear now.

Technically speaking, Dodge has the best change to pull this off with no help from any other company. However, there is no business case for them to produce this car based on the poor Challenger sales, small market for a SRT8+ 27K Viper engine Challenger, financial problems of Chrysler and it would ruin the exclusive nature of the 2012 Viper.
it would not ruin the exclusive nature 2012 viper.......the 2012 viper is just that...the return of the viper. no matter if the challenger sported the engine in 2011. plus it will be returning with more hp than its 600 hp varient.

and no one said the challenger v10 would be massed produced. it will be a limited car and high priced most likely. and btw challenger sales are not poor. they sell just about what they produce per year which is 30000 which is 70000 less than the camaro and the mustang build. this car has always been limited and that is the reason why the srt8 is so pricey. it has always been a low volume car in chryslers line.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 06:32 PM   #82
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323 View Post
it would not ruin the exclusive nature 2012 viper.......the 2012 viper is just that...the return of the viper. no matter if the challenger sported the engine in 2011. plus it will be returning with more hp than its 600 hp varient.

and no one said the challenger v10 would be massed produced. it will be a limited car and high priced most likely. and btw challenger sales are not poor. they sell just about what they produce per year which is 30000 which is 70000 less than the camaro and the mustang build. this car has always been limited and that is the reason why the srt8 is so pricey. it has always been a low volume car in chryslers line.
2012 Viper is a lot of speculation at this point. With Chrysler's uncertain future it may not be worth doing. They sold far less than 1000 Vipers in 2009 and much less than that in 2010.

It does not make financial sense to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to develop, test and produce 30,000 low/mid priced cars per year. They are losing money hand over fist on the Challenger with no change in sight.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:39 PM   #83
xs29j8
Hemis, Six Packs, & Wings
 
Drives: 2009 Challenger SRT8 & Old Mopars
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
My thought is not that would only receive that many orders, but that is how many Dodge will build. As I said a new supercharged or turbocharged 6.4 (backed by the new 8 speed auto) would be my preference. I personally wouldn't many if any of the V10s my self. My point is that they will make it, but that if they could. IMHO it is kind of redundant.
I still have my doubts about a Viper V10 powered Challenger, but believe that something might be in the works. Keeping in mind that Hemi Orange seems to be Dodge's favorite launch color for the Challenger, here is what a Chrysler worker posted today on a Mopar forum:

Quote:
Posted Today, 04:53 pm

They ran quite a few Hemi-Orange Challengers down the line today with the same cutout in the hood that they use for the Mopar '10... but isn't it only available in black?
When someone confirmed the M10 Challenger was only to be made in black, another Chrysler worker replied:

Quote:
Posted Today, 06:08 pm
We thought the same thing on Final today....someone had already put it in the computer to verify the hood. Some calls were made....then it was confirmed that the hood scoops will now be functional. Its nice how we are last to know...yet we are the ones building the car. WCM at it's best.
It could be something as simple as a second color for the M10, or a new option on R/Ts or SRT8s... ooooor ???

XS
xs29j8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 10:55 PM   #84
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
2012 Viper is a lot of speculation at this point. With Chrysler's uncertain future it may not be worth doing. They sold far less than 1000 Vipers in 2009 and much less than that in 2010.

It does not make financial sense to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to develop, test and produce 30,000 low/mid priced cars per year. They are losing money hand over fist on the Challenger with no change in sight.
again you have your facts wrong....and indeed these are facts.
2012 viper is a go........it was on the list during chryslers 5 year plan powerpoint and then just last week during the dealer show. two separate dealer owners who went confirmed that the 2012 viper was shown to everyone in attendance. of course there are no pics because it was a private showing for dealers and metal detectors were used and no phones were allowed.

so again sir your fake preaching doesnt work here. sorry but we have high expectations for trolls here and you do not meet them. please start stating opinions and not false facts.

oh and just so you know, challenger is built on the same line as the charger, and other cars at the brampton plant. this isnt the viper ok?

so no they arent losing money making 30k a year. because it doesnt cost them any more to manufacture it then it does the other line of cars. but you already knew that. remember this isnt the challengers first year lol.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
alrox = tool, alrox=idiot


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New photos: Camaro Z28 Testing Against GT500 Tran Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 469 11-23-2010 01:07 AM
New Camaro Z28 rendering 13F20 Camaro Photoshops / Renderings Forum 182 07-16-2010 11:45 PM
Car&Driver tests 2011 GT-500, 4.1 to 60, 12.4 Quarter, Will Chevy answer with Z28? Impact Chevy Camaro vs... 69 06-05-2010 01:03 PM
Ontario to become home of the all-new 2008 Dodge Challenger Mr. Wyndham General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 3 08-09-2007 03:54 AM
It's arrived! Camaro's answer to the Shelby GT500 Moose Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 34 03-28-2007 11:37 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.