The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-28-2010, 05:21 PM   #15
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010 2-Tone View Post
You could be right. I just think the extra weight they are going to gain along with the extra hp that they won't be able to make up the every how small the difference may be. The Camaro, the Mustang and the Challenger will always be compared. Just my opinion but thanks for listening.
The 6.4 would weigh about the same as the 6.1 it replaces. Adding displacement doesn't really add weight to an engine. Could even be lighter, if they replace the iron block with aluminum. And the weight gain from the 8 speed will probably be closer to 25 lbs, not 250. Beyond that ... there isn't really anything that could add weight.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 05:36 PM   #16
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010 2-Tone View Post
Very well put!!!
JMVHO

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
The 6.4 would weigh about the same as the 6.1 it replaces. Adding displacement doesn't really add weight to an engine. Could even be lighter, if they replace the iron block with aluminum. And the weight gain from the 8 speed will probably be closer to 25 lbs, not 250. Beyond that ... there isn't really anything that could add weight.
I totally forgot about the iron block! There's another 100 pounds probably!
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 06:19 PM   #17
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010 2-Tone View Post
I understand what your saying BUT let's compare Apples to Apples, 2SS against SRT8 and see what the price difference is!

Read my post, that is what I did.......
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 06:24 PM   #18
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
The 6.4 would weigh about the same as the 6.1 it replaces. Adding displacement doesn't really add weight to an engine. Could even be lighter, if they replace the iron block with aluminum. And the weight gain from the 8 speed will probably be closer to 25 lbs, not 250. Beyond that ... there isn't really anything that could add weight.
Should be all Aluminum I believe as it is based on the newer 5.7 and not the older 6.1. Also it is getting electric power steering which should save a few pounds as well as reduce power loss to the rear wheels
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 06:28 PM   #19
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Should be all Aluminum I believe as it is based on the newer 5.7 and not the older 6.1. Also it is getting electric power steering which should save a few pounds as well as reduce power loss to the rear wheels
No, it would reduce power loss to the flywheel. And all accessories are accounted for under SAE net testing anyway, so there isn't going to be any 'hidden' power gain from it. It just contributes to its 480ish rated output.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 07:30 PM   #20
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
there will be virtually no weight gain as the new 6.4 is based off of the 5.7 v8 not the 6.1.

It will need to be compared to the gt500 because of it's new added hp putting it past the SS in straight line performance.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 07:32 PM   #21
Skoulikimou
 
Skoulikimou's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro SS LS3 2010
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: kuwait
Posts: 140
2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 to get 480 HP?

2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 to get 480 HP?

First and foremost among the predicted changes on the 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT-8 is more power from an enlarged 6.4-liter Hemi: a bump of 55 horsepower and 40 pound-feet of torque. That would put the big coupe at 480 ponies and 460 lb-ft., and rumor also has it that power will get to the wheels through an eight-speed automatic transmission developed by Chrysler and ZF. Also according to Allpar's inside man, output levels will remain the same on the R/T model, while the base SE will get Pentastar V6 engines with 40 more horses and 20 more lb-ft, for 290 hp and 270 lb-ft. in total.

Most of the other supposed changes seem meant to make life easier for Chrysler and Challenger buyers. The floorpan is being reworked so the car fits more easily into Charger and 300 production, an electric power steering pump is coming onboard and an upgraded interior is in the offing. Cosmetically, the muscle car picks up the Charger's door handles, the Magnum wagon's hatch release button for its trunk, and the lower front grille gets turned upside down.

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/28/2...to-get-480-hp/
Skoulikimou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 07:33 PM   #22
Skoulikimou
 
Skoulikimou's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro SS LS3 2010
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: kuwait
Posts: 140
please delete this thread
Skoulikimou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 08:12 PM   #23
Apex Motorsports
 
Apex Motorsports's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skoulikimou View Post
please delete this thread
Why? That is interesting info.
Apex Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 08:40 PM   #24
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apex Chase View Post
Why? That is interesting info.
because it was already posted

threads merged
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 08:48 PM   #25
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcamaro View Post
It's still an overweight boat. Larger engine and 8-speed auto transmission? Even more weight going on. Hope they lighten other things. Although 480HP does sound nice.



More displacement doesn't mean it will be physically larger. I wouldn't expect weight to rise much, if any.
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 11:42 PM   #26
wbt
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323 View Post
there will be virtually no weight gain as the new 6.4 is based off of the 5.7 v8 not the 6.1.

It will need to be compared to the gt500 because of it's new added hp putting it past the SS in straight line performance.
Dodge is still missing the boat in comparison with the GT500. The 2011 GT500 is rated at 550HP, is lighter, and will run circles around the 6.4/8 speed auto if this is indeed what is to be released.

IMO what should have happened:

  • R/T gets the 6.1 from the outgoing SRT8; 5.7 is dropped; price remains the same.
  • SRT8 gets a 6.4 525+HP motor and improved suspension to compete with the GT500 and Z/28. Pricing is in-line with the GT500 and Z/28.
wbt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 12:26 AM   #27
nester7929
Rice Harvester
 
nester7929's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
Dodge is really shooting themselves in the foot by focusing their upgrades on the the SE and SRT-8. The R/T attracts the most interest, but is underpowered so most enthusiasts don't give it a second glance. If it had 400-hp on paper with an upgraded interior, I think it could give GM and Ford a run for their money.

It's a real shame too. The Chally has some of the sexiest lines of any recent production car from any major automotive manufacturer. It's sad that Dodge doesn't seem to want to be as invested in the pony wars as much as Ford and GM.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wbt View Post
Dodge is still missing the boat in comparison with the GT500. The 2011 GT500 is rated at 550HP, is lighter, and will run circles around the 6.4/8 speed auto if this is indeed what is to be released.

IMO what should have happened:

  • R/T gets the 6.1 from the outgoing SRT8; 5.7 is dropped; price remains the same.
  • SRT8 gets a 6.4 525+HP motor and improved suspension to compete with the GT500 and Z/28. Pricing is in-line with the GT500 and Z/28.
Those were literally my exact thoughts.
nester7929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 12:26 AM   #28
lil_chef
Banned
 
Drives: 2010 Mustang GT
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 1,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by wbt View Post
Dodge is still missing the boat in comparison with the GT500. The 2011 GT500 is rated at 550HP, is lighter, and will run circles around the 6.4/8 speed auto if this is indeed what is to be released.

IMO what should have happened:

  • R/T gets the 6.1 from the outgoing SRT8; 5.7 is dropped; price remains the same.
  • SRT8 gets a 6.4 525+HP motor and improved suspension to compete with the GT500 and Z/28. Pricing is in-line with the GT500 and Z/28.

if i recall correctly the 5.7 is actually a newer more sophisticated motor than the 6.1 and that the 6.4 is actually being developed off of that. and without putting my entire foot in my mouth i will attempt to say the 5.7 is being held back by the 6.1 since it is not allowed to step on big brother's toes.
lil_chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cop on a horse sspaul Off-topic Discussions 12 12-07-2009 10:44 PM
Dodge Challenger gets a huge price cut. StoutFiles General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 207 01-26-2009 08:50 PM
Comparison Test, by Proxy: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 AirGoya Chevy Camaro vs... 86 07-24-2008 12:20 PM
Challenger Pricing LSxcellent General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 31 12-03-2007 10:00 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.