|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should the camaro ''really'' need a touch screen with hi technology features? | |||
| YES, it should |
|
32 | 36.78% |
| I dont care |
|
28 | 32.18% |
| I think it's useless |
|
27 | 31.03% |
| Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#15 |
|
Enlightened
Drives: Nothing Currently Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,285
|
Definitely a step up from last year, but still sub par.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,729
|
I Love the look. A touchscreen is not useless, however I voted that it is useless because there is no option that says I don't want one... They get outdated so quickly it isn't even funny.. And after a year the bulb gets faded and you can barely see the screen in the sunlight..
I do love the new Mustang interior look and it is on par with the Camaro's interior in my opinion.. If you like screens, then the Mustang has the edge there..
__________________
Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 GT500 Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 662
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: V45 Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,270
|
Quote:
I'm sorry dude but I think you're wrong. And in your other post, you said that having another gear wouldn't increase top speed. How is that true? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Drives: 1999 T-Top Camaro V-6 Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego,CA
Posts: 64
|
I do like the new Mustang interior, but I don`t like the touch screen and wish you could get rid of it.So no, I don`t think the Camaro needs it because I wouldn`t get it even if you could.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Camaro➎ moderator
|
The steering wheel looks exactly like the Camaro's
And as for the touch screen, It's just more of a distraction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |||
![]() Drives: 2010 GT500 Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 662
|
Quote:
Do some research about this 5spd vs 6 spd debate and you'll see. I'm not making this shit up. Here watch this. Z06 hitting 190 in 5th gear at just over 6000rpm and the ZR1 hitting 200 mph in 6th gear at 6000 rpm. With the gearing in a V6 Camaro theoretical top end at redline is close to 200 mph. Do you think it'll be able to go that fast? Then why? Fuel economy. Very cool videos by the way. Last edited by porcupinekiller; 11-18-2008 at 08:15 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: V45 Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,270
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,314
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Go Cardinals!
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS 6-speed #1879 Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 856
|
That stripe on the seat reminds me of a 1967 Nova SS interior. As far as nav screens or touch screens....who needs that? Does it make the car faster? NOPE. Just more crap that can fail down the road. You can keep the tv screen thankyou.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Drives: 2009 335i Coupe Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Coto De Caza, CA
Posts: 215
|
i like the nav the nav is a nice option to have and looks way better then a portable nav but wtv i like the camaro interior better its different from other cars
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,314
|
i wish the maro had it to be honest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 872
|
While I don't think the Camaro needs a touch screen thing, I must say I do like the new Mustang interior, though that is one of the only things I like about the car!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2SS/RS (M6) 427 Twin Turbo Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,090
|
im really liking the interior i think it looks great and also the exterior is pretty nice too but 315 hp come on
__________________
![]() 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS ERL 427 M6 TT -AGP Twin Turbo 55/57 .83ar | ERL 427ci | Squash Fuel System | Stainless Works Chambered 3" | Mcleod RXT | Factory Hurst Short Throw | Black Forgestar F14s | CTS V 6 Piston Brembo | VIS AMS Carbon Fiber Hood | Anvil Carbon Fiber Spoiler |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OFFICIAL 2010 Camaro Specifications (full tech specs PDF inside) | Tran | Guides, Manuals, Bulletins, Documentation Archive | 394 | 06-11-2010 06:16 PM |
| Edmunds: 2010 Ford Mustang First Look | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 32 | 11-23-2008 09:55 PM |
| Voice Your Comments/Suggestions/Input for Focus Group on 2010 Camaro | Mr. Wyndham | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 235 | 04-22-2008 12:43 AM |