300c srt8

[a_Username]

Originally Posted by Sleestack

300SRT8 in mid 12's....... 12.56 @ 111

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/street...one-stock.html

That's the same one I posted up from DragTimes (and apparently the original one I remember). I just find it weird that he filmed his 12.6 run and not his 12.5 run?

[ViperTomcat]

Originally Posted by a_Username

That's the same one I posted up from DragTimes (and apparently the original one I remember). I just find it weird that he filmed his 12.6 run and not his 12.5 run?

Maybe he wasnt filming it because he didnt think he would do better than 12.6?

Who knows.

[kevin2323]

haters gonna keep on hatin baby...

[fazm]

just dont get how a similar weight, poorer geared car, with an auto runs faster than an srt8 challenger? and not even a little bit faster lol

not saying its impossible, but i would think it means an srt8 challenger should be able to do 12.6 too, and a camaro ss should do 12.3 or 12.4

300c has 3.59 first and 3.06 final
challenger is 3.59 first and 3.92 final

(just lookin up those specs, since im not a big chrysler follower)

[a_Username]

Originally Posted by fazm

just dont get how a similar weight, poorer geared car, with an auto runs faster than an srt8 challenger? and not even a little bit faster lol

not saying its impossible, but i would think it means an srt8 challenger should be able to do 12.6 too, and a camaro ss should do 12.3 or 12.4

300c has 3.59 first and 3.06 final
challenger is 3.59 first and 3.92 final

(just lookin up those specs, since im not a big chrysler follower)

There is a lot of logical explanations to discredit that run. He could have hid a tune, he could have bought a factory freak from hell, etc. But then again who knows, and who cares lol.