The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

View Poll Results: .
Camaro 0 0%
Mustang 0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-16-2010, 09:32 PM   #5069
SS 376

 
SS 376's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM 1SS (Former)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,031
Timeslip? MPH?

oh this is a damn repost lol. you just took this from another thread and posted it here

Last edited by SS 376; 05-16-2010 at 09:46 PM.
SS 376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:34 PM   #5070
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS 376 View Post
Timeslip? MPH?
That is what I want also.

60ft and mph are the most important to me.

Heard from a supposed friend of his we might get the timeslip tomorrow.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:38 PM   #5071
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
I can't wait till the Boss comes out.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:41 PM   #5072
2010SLVRBULIT


 
2010SLVRBULIT's Avatar
 
Drives: G5(LLT) & C6(LS3)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MARS
Posts: 7,525
butt is still fugly..
2010SLVRBULIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:43 PM   #5073
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywoodGU View Post
haha, touche! IDK in my mind tho, these Cars are about HP and TQ...not being light weight...

I think camaros/mustangs/challengers are about HP and TQ. IMO they are the heavy weight sluggers, full of power with a lot of wieght to back it up! but like I said, thats just me
i think larger cars would be the heavy weight sluggers. Theres no reason why a smallish pony car coupe should be this heavy.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:46 PM   #5074
a_Username


 
a_Username's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 3,890
Who was this from? (Magazine, Private Source, etc.)
a_Username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:49 PM   #5075
fazm
 
Drives: ex-500hp v6 mustang
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: arizona
Posts: 605
mike at powerhouse. its his private vehicle.
fazm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:50 PM   #5076
fazm
 
Drives: ex-500hp v6 mustang
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: arizona
Posts: 605
the only mph i have is his 109mph on his 13.1 run (first run) they are going to check through videos of the day and see if anyone caught it (he thinks it was 112mph)
fazm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:52 PM   #5077
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
109 would make since on his 13.1 run. He said he spun through 2nd gear on that run.

If it was 112mph stock that would be ****ing awesome.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:55 PM   #5078
hollywoodGU
 
Drives: 1999 Firebird Formula
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Monmouth, OR
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sax1031 View Post
pony cars were never really meant to be that heavy.
69 rs/ss with the 396 weighed in at approx 3800...not exactly a light weight
hollywoodGU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 09:56 PM   #5079
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywoodGU View Post
69 rs/ss with the 396 weighed in at approx 3800...not exactly a light weight
What did other cars weight at the time, like sedans and what not?
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 10:00 PM   #5080
a_Username


 
a_Username's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 3,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sax1031 View Post
What did other cars weight at the time, like sedans and what not?


Looks like the Camaro is a little below average then and now.
a_Username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 10:01 PM   #5081
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by a_Username View Post


Looks like the Camaro is a little below average then and now.
I wasn't specifically talking about the Camaro.

Just saying Pony cars were never really meant to be heavy, for the time.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 10:03 PM   #5082
hollywoodGU
 
Drives: 1999 Firebird Formula
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Monmouth, OR
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by a_Username View Post


Looks like the Camaro is a little below average then and now.
If that chart is accurate it pretty much shows that the Camaro pretty much has been the weight of the average vehicle, both back in the day and now
hollywoodGU is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2011, 2011 mustang, 442trumpsall, 5.0, camaro, camaro lost!!!, camaro lost., carthatsucks, corvette, drag, fanboys anonymous, ford, ford mustang, glue factory, gluefactory, gt ss ssrs comparison ford, gtss, mustang, numbers, oldnag, race, tired nag, trolls, video


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread Beau Tie Chevy Camaro vs... 3644 03-09-2012 08:45 PM
Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? 5thGenOwner 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 111 12-06-2011 11:06 AM
Official 2011 Mustang GT info released nester7929 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 81 12-28-2009 04:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.