|
|
#197 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#198 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Nobody would cross shop a Ram with a Viper.
People would probably start cross shopping Viper powered Chargers/Challengers with Vipers. You start selling a LS9 powered Z/28 for near the same price as a base Vette and you will probably see Vette sales fall. |
|
|
|
|
|
#199 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#200 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
by reading the article it sounds like the ones using the iron block engines will be lighter because of the switch to aluminum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#201 |
|
12.23s@113mph
Drives: 2SS/RS, A6, just a few bolt ons Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,197
|
standard equipment on each car, camaro wins... motortrend had to cheat and add the optional 3.73 gears and track pack to beat the camaro.
of course if we added lower rear gears and sport suspension, they'd be biting their lip.
__________________
RIP Cammie 7/15/2009 - 4/1/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
#202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Good god.
Because Chevy doesn't give the consumer the option for gears then it is cheating. And their is no track pack option. The suspension is standard on all GTs and a option for people getting the V6 stangs. The only two performance options are gears and the brembo brake package. |
|
|
|
|
|
#203 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2001 Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 754
|
Quote:
it's only a $395 option, adding an option to a car is not any kind of "cheating" lmao No track pack on the GT's it's all standard. also why would a camaro need a suspension upgrade? what's wrong with yours? they handle fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#204 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#205 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
I will say that I doubt Ford would go all out with the 660hp package but they still warranty the 660hp GT500 cars so that is on the table. I think Ford would start out slow. They would probably up the GT500 to 605hp and put the ball back in Chevy's court. And the GT500 is underrated at 540hp, at least for the 2010 models. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#206 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#207 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
I seriously hope GM doesn't just take an unchanged LSA from the Caddy and put it in the Z/28. Beef up the internals at least. Ford warranties the 660hp package because they feel safe that at those power levels with their tune the engine will still last. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#208 | |
![]() Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CAMARO WIKI | Tran | Wiki | 67 | 11-27-2024 08:02 AM |
| Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 | Number 3 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 31 | 04-17-2011 03:24 PM |
| Think about this and the Z28 5th gen | 13F20 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 41 | 09-04-2010 12:59 AM |
| Inside Line Burnout Contest: SS, R/T, GT | DGthe3 | Chevy Camaro vs... | 133 | 05-27-2010 03:20 PM |
| Help the Camaro win Motortrend's Championship | truth411 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 56 | 07-02-2009 05:10 AM |