The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-12-2010, 04:09 AM   #1
a_Username


 
a_Username's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 3,890
GT500: No 5.0L Twin Turbo

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/08/f...-shelby-gt500/



Quote:
In recent months, rumors have been rampant that the next generation of Ford's Shelby GT500 Mustang would dump the existing 5.4-liter supercharged V8 in favor of a twin-turbo version of the new 5.0-liter Coyote V8 that debuts this spring. Unfortunately, in spite of earlier reports confirming the development, it appears that such an engine will not be installed in the GT500 any time soon. Autoblog had the chance to talk with Mike Harrison, Ford's chief engineer for the 5.0-liter and 6.2-liter V8 engines this morning, and he made it clear that the mooted engine is not part of the program for the Blue Oval bomber.

Harrison explained that such a configuration would be almost impossible for Ford to engineer because the 5.0-liter already consumes virtually the entire engine compartment. There is evidently no room to mount the turbos on the outside of the block where the exhaust currently resides. One possibility would be to put the turbos in the valley of the block similar to the new 6.7-liter diesel or BMW's 4.4-liter twin-turbo V8, but this creates a bunch of new problems as well. The heat generated by having the turbos up top would probably cause the paint on the hood to bubble and peel unless Ford could add some exotic and undoubtedly expensive heat shielding, which is unlikely to happen.

The other issue is that this configuration would really only work if the intake and exhaust flow were reversed, putting the exhaust in the valley. Without this change, the paths from the exhaust ports to the turbos would be too long, resulting in excess turbo lag and unacceptable performance. However, this would require a level of engineering investment for new heads that Ford is unlikely to make in such a low-volume program. Thus, we'll have to be satisfied with the aluminum block 5.4 that is arriving later this year.
Looks like those rumors are killed.
a_Username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 08:27 AM   #2
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
interesting
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 08:59 AM   #3
Ninjak
Banned
 
Drives: 08 GT Mustang | 65 GT Notchbac
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Miami Florida
Posts: 819
Yeah...been around for a bit on the Mustang sites. But the rumor's now are that Shelby may introduce a similar tech with their rumored GT350, base off the 5.0 engine.

Guess we will see come the 18th or so.
Ninjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 09:46 AM   #4
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,873
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
That car really does look nice...I think it's the wheels that really do it for me...

Anyways, this is interesting...I don't visit Mustang sites, and I heard those rumors a lot, too. It makes sense not to do it, though, based on the reasons above.

Actually, it sounds like the same reasons GM didn't put turbochargers into the ZR1...testing created "thermal events".
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 10:36 AM   #5
ironpeddler
 
Drives: 2010 Shelby GT500
Join Date: May 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 288
I always thought the rumor for the twin turbos GT500 would be for the 2012 year. Not for 2011. I think that Ford will wait and see if GM introduces the Z28 before they come out with a completely new GT500 engine. 2011 GT500 engine is the same as the 2010 except it has an aluminum block.
__________________
Black/silver stripes 2010 GT500
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akc1A-Jus_k
^^^ mustang dyno video
ironpeddler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 06:03 PM   #6
a_Username


 
a_Username's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 3,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by ironpeddler View Post
I always thought the rumor for the twin turbos GT500 would be for the 2012 year. Not for 2011. I think that Ford will wait and see if GM introduces the Z28 before they come out with a completely new GT500 engine. 2011 GT500 engine is the same as the 2010 except it has an aluminum block.
The article explained it in a way that makes me think it won't be in there during any MY. I agree though, they'll wait on the Z/28 so they can see what GM brings to the table in that segment.
a_Username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 06:06 PM   #7
truth411

 
Drives: 2022 SS 1LE
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, tx
Posts: 1,302
I bet $100 they place a TVS 1900 supercharger on top of the 5.0 and Forge the internals.
truth411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 06:06 PM   #8
Crowley
Okie doke
 
Crowley's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 GT500
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: McKinney Texas
Posts: 3,567
It doesn't need it anyway .. lets keep the low end grunt ... I'd really like to see them do a 6 - 6.2L supercharged engine from the factory .. 575 - 600 hp .... that would be great ... however what it has now 5.4L or even if they put in the aluminum block to save some weight .. it rocks either way.

Crowley
__________________
Crowley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 06:10 PM   #9
The_Blur
Moderator
 
The_Blur's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Harley-Davidson Street Bob
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,768
Send a message via AIM to The_Blur
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR
RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN.
warn 145:159 ban
The_Blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 06:15 PM   #10
syr74
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Thunderbird
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
Quote:
Originally Posted by truth411 View Post
I bet $100 they place a TVS 1900 supercharger on top of the 5.0 and Forge the internals.
And I would bet $100 that you are partially correct.
syr74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 06:20 PM   #11
a_Username


 
a_Username's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 3,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
That car really does look nice...I think it's the wheels that really do it for me...

Anyways, this is interesting...I don't visit Mustang sites, and I heard those rumors a lot, too. It makes sense not to do it, though, based on the reasons above.

Actually, it sounds like the same reasons GM didn't put turbochargers into the ZR1...testing created "thermal events".
A friend of ours is looking at a slightly wrecked GT500 on a site. If the bid doesn't go over $25,000K for it, then I'll take it and fix it myself.
a_Username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 06:24 PM   #12
truth411

 
Drives: 2022 SS 1LE
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, tx
Posts: 1,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by syr74 View Post
And I would bet $100 that you are partially correct.
Therefore I want My $50 bucks
truth411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 07:01 PM   #13
syr74
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Thunderbird
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
Quote:
Originally Posted by truth411 View Post
Therefore I want My $50 bucks
I'm not liking your math.
syr74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 07:46 PM   #14
fazm
 
Drives: ex-500hp v6 mustang
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: arizona
Posts: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by syr74 View Post
And I would bet $100 that you are partially correct.
thats cuz hes wrong on the tvs1900 part, close though
fazm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It has begun...twin turbo 2010 GT500 garagelogic General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 209 07-27-2010 08:48 PM
2010 Nickey Super Camaro Twin Turbo edition. NicKey 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 134 07-03-2010 08:29 PM
STS Twin Turbo Kits On Sale! tbyrne Forced Induction 26 02-08-2010 07:31 AM
STS Twin Turbo Kits Coming Soon!!! tbyrne Forced Induction 18 10-19-2009 10:06 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.