Challenger gets Appearance Package - Page 5

Mr Smith · 02-05-2010, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevin2323

someones mad

back on topic............dodge hit it out of the ballpark going retro...and they will continue that trend....this package you do not have to buy....there is plenty of aftermarket hoods accessories and cheaper than from mopar. the camaro did well going modern and dodge did well going retro.....hence all the retro hood and accessories. have a nice day

Naw.Just dont take stabs at someone you know nothing about...Move along..Nothing here to see..

1bad65 · 02-05-2010, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stew

The R/T autos are running pretty consistant 13.1-13.3s, they are quicker than the 6 speeds (which is what all the rags test). Also I want to see what an R/T with the STP (with 3 season tires instead of all seasons) runs.

If the R/T is running consistant 13.1-13.3s, what does the SRT run?

We all know it's no 12 second car, and if the R/T is a low 13 second car....

Stew · 02-05-2010, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1bad65

If the R/T is running consistant 13.1-13.3s, what does the SRT run?

We all know it's no 12 second car, and if the R/T is a low 13 second car....

Hence why it is imparitive to get the 6.4 in the SRT

The 5.7 seems to be putting out closer to 400 HP than 375 and it is lighter than the SRT.

kevin2323 · 02-05-2010, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1bad65

If the R/T is running consistant 13.1-13.3s, what does the SRT run?

We all know it's no 12 second car, and if the R/T is a low 13 second car....

again i hate to be the teacher here but go do ur hw.....their are stock srts running high 12s...and even an stock rt that ran 12.98 stock....

newagemuscle · 02-05-2010, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blownhotrodder

Nothing like a fake in your face hood scoop. They get major cheese points for that one.

I guess us gen 5 owners can't say much then. Our scoop is fake also. GM is notorius for this. Our flag ship ZR1 & Z06 are sporting fake scoops also and the ones that did actually work (WS6 & gen 4 Camaro) were pretty worthless.

SleepWarz · 02-05-2010, 08:32 PM

The mailslot may be fake but its not protruding like a pimple!

Rallysport · 02-05-2010, 09:43 PM

I understand why Dodge did it. Spruce up the retro ride with some fresh retro looks to boost sales a bit. No harm, no foul. The real Mopar guys will be all over this. I really don't care, I am buying a Camaro, not a Chally.

nester7929 · 02-05-2010, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rallysport

I understand why Dodge did it. Spruce up the retro ride with some fresh retro looks to boost sales a bit. No harm, no foul. The real Mopar guys will be all over this. I really don't care, I am buying a Camaro, not a Chally.

Agreed. Let them have their fun. If they want to spend 2k more on an already-overpriced car, then let them.

Axe · 02-05-2010, 11:22 PM

Love this car, someday Ill add one to my fleet. Weak point is the interior of course-really hate the cliche double din-looking stereo, and the 3 knob setup for the hvac controls. Lame.

wbt · 02-06-2010, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1bad65

If the R/T is running consistant 13.1-13.3s, what does the SRT run?

We all know it's no 12 second car, and if the R/T is a low 13 second car....

I'll take my wife's 2010 Mustang GT and take any comparable R/T on...auto or manual.

More Internet racing FTW!

manimsoblack · 02-06-2010, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedJewelrsss32

Sweet more added weight

What he/she said.

kevin2323 · 02-06-2010, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nester7929

Agreed. Let them have their fun. If they want to spend 2k more on an already-overpriced car, then let them.

and i would spend the extra money not to look like the chick stang i see about 400 per day....

ViperTomcat · 02-06-2010, 02:07 PM

Eh..if the T/A hood was functional I might..its a fiberglass hood, not that heavy to begin with.

I'll keep my stock hood with its functional scoops over this.

The spoiler is good looking, but fairly common, and I dig the T-handle. I could see some enterprising a/m company making a version of this that is functional. I'd buy one of those..but not this.

Lets not turn this into another internet racing argument where each side argues into eternity and gets nowhere!

a_Username · 02-06-2010, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevin2323

again i hate to be the teacher here but go do ur hw.....their are stock srts running high 12s...and even an stock rt that ran 12.98 stock....

Where all the imaginary SRTs and RTs that ran these said times?

02-05-2010, 09:43 PM	#63
Rallysport Go Cardinals! Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS 6-speed #1879 Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Omaha, NE Posts: 856 View My Garage	I understand why Dodge did it. Spruce up the retro ride with some fresh retro looks to boost sales a bit. No harm, no foul. The real Mopar guys will be all over this. I really don't care, I am buying a Camaro, not a Chally. __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Production Synergy Green Camaro Special Edition - press release and photos	CJP	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	158	01-23-2010 10:42 PM
Challenger Priced	Design1stCode2nd	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	176	09-08-2008 07:33 PM

02-05-2010, 08:32 PM	#62
SleepWarz Banned Drives: 1991 New Yorker, 69 Tbird, ABM2SSRS Join Date: May 2009 Location: BC Canada Posts: 2,248 View My Garage	The mailslot may be fake but its not protruding like a pimple!

02-05-2010, 11:22 PM	#65
Axe Drives: 2018 LS Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: poconos,pa Posts: 187	Love this car, someday Ill add one to my fleet. Weak point is the interior of course-really hate the cliche double din-looking stereo, and the 3 knob setup for the hvac controls. Lame.

02-06-2010, 02:07 PM	#69
ViperTomcat Banned Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Oregon Posts: 1,697	Eh..if the T/A hood was functional I might..its a fiberglass hood, not that heavy to begin with. I'll keep my stock hood with its functional scoops over this. The spoiler is good looking, but fairly common, and I dig the T-handle. I could see some enterprising a/m company making a version of this that is functional. I'd buy one of those..but not this. Lets not turn this into another internet racing argument where each side argues into eternity and gets nowhere!