|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
5.0L Coyote engine being test in Mustang Mule
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/s...-mustang-mule/
I have seen these pics before im sorry if this is a repost.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MOD SQUAD
|
This is definitely going to heat things up in the muscle car area. It will be interesting to see what answers GM and Chrysler have for this…
__________________
Who cares about the Blue Oval crowd and their little Ponys? We're getting our Camaro back-and it'll be Supercharged!-MDAII Team LS3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
2011 can't come fast enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Should be interesting how much Weight will be added.
And then of course if Ford ever decides to go with an IRS.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
Quote:
Ford probably won't put IRS in. I think I see what Ford is trying to do. They're going to try to make the 5.0 put out around 400-hp, but it will weigh less than the Camaro. They'll keep the live axel to cut costs so they can have a faster Mustang for less than a Camaro. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
Oh don't get me wrong, I'd love to drive a Mustang that doesn't toss me about in the cabin, but I'd be perfectly content with buying a 5.0 for less than 30k.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
I mean, with all the stuff they have added that should be more than a 1k price increase just factory cost. ... Unless they were completely ripping people off before haha.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Drives: 2010 IOM Camaro Vin 34334 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 566
|
Well the engine is not a bored over 4.6, its a destroked 5.4. There is also no way they are going to keep it under the price of a Camaro unless you buy the base model with no upgrades. The price difference between the two equally optioned is only $1500 now. I dont think with the new enigne and transmisson you are going to keep the price you are looking for. With the upgrades in drivetrain you are looking at added weight. They gained weight just with a few changes in body panels from last year to this one. The further upgrades, drivetrain and upgraded safety are going to add weight too. I say around 3700lbs for the new Mustang. Once again tho this is all just internet speculation until the numbers are actually done and in print.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
I want to guess that a Mustang with this "Coyote" engine tips the scales at ~3600......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Keeper of the Faith
Drives: 2001 Z28 Agressively Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rosenberg,Texas
Posts: 1,380
|
But by then the Camaro will have upped the HP. Throughout history GM has made mechanical improvements on odd numbered years and cosmetic changes on even numbered years. So I'm sure 2011 will bring more power or a different motor.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS R6P 2001 Camaro Z28 1969 Camaro SS clone ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Oldbie that nobody knows
|
Haha, funny. 2011 is like 1971; the beginning of which was the apex of the musclecars. Hopefully it won't die down again the following year, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
Quote:
The Gen V engines should start showing up in 2-4 years depending on how much money GM is able to throw at R&D while staying afloat. I'm willing to bet that there won't be a new powerplant in the Camaro until the Gen Vs are here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
GM will respond in one of 3 ways. A. They do nothing. They believe the SS will still outsell its competition and that it is still the best car out there. B. They come out with a higher performance model that is capable of attracting a buyer who might have gone to an SRT or GT500. C. They offer benefits that match the competition while delivering a superior product. (0% financing Etc.)
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro, Mustang and Challenger road test shots!!!! | 91t/a | Camaro Photoshops / Renderings Forum | 29 | 11-07-2008 01:03 AM |
| Comparison Test, by Proxy: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 | AirGoya | Chevy Camaro vs... | 86 | 07-24-2008 12:20 PM |
| Turbocharge your way to efficiency.....and power! | Mr. Wyndham | Forced Induction - V8 | 20 | 07-06-2008 01:46 PM |
| GM moves closer to HCCI engine production | Scotsman | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 16 | 05-16-2008 07:16 PM |
| 2007 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Convertible | KILLER74Z28 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 10 | 04-11-2008 05:11 PM |