Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3
Pretty sure you won't think it's very funny when you see how this car will perform with the LF3.
CTS V-sport with the same engine is a 4.6 second car. And as GM will be clearly targeting the M3/M4 with this car and the ATS has a several hundred pound weight advantage over a CTS, you can rest assured you are looking at a 4 second car.
That, good sir, is not funny. Not funny at all.
And do not confuse this car with the CTS-V. That will be a different animal all together and likely see the LT4.
And I reserve judgment that what is under the hood of the car in these photos is not an LT1. There is a bit of room under the hood of our ATS and the LT1 would certainly make this a car to choose over the M3/M4. And that would be even less funny than the LF3.
|
LT1 is more powerful. For marketing, this turbo 6 makes more sense than the LT1 I agree. Would have been great to have a Caddy version of the Camaro 
Great car but I really dont think the hp will go up. I like when GM is ahead of the game on HP numbers but thats me.
__________________
13' 1LE
Old setup: TSP 231-236/Tick 660/.105 PR, UDP, SW LT 2'' & HFC, stock NPP & H pipe, VR-DRX CAI, air scoop, Goertz1 manifold, 102mm BBK, 26" Toyo DRs, Forgestars R17x10 & F18x8, rear seat delete, remote Pat G tune Autocal, 7400 limiter, Spec Mini Twin. 91oct. 11.90@122.3, 0-60ft 2.0 / 11.99@123.6, 0-60ft 2.1 DA+819 ...519RWHP SAE
Solid roller SBE LS3, FED, LLSR, 91oct, 605rwhp N/A. Tuned by Pat G. Build by me.
|