Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack
The SS has some runs in the mid 12's. The 392 will be faster in stock form than the SS, just something you will need to come to grips with. With a better power\weight ratio, and a pretty sophisticated Auto Transmission and Suspension from Mercedes in the SRT8 Auto, hero runs of 12.3 can be expected. Magazine times are often average drivers with average conditions.
|
Ummm no.... the auto trans is still the shitty 5spd that's in the 2010's....and explain to me how there's a whopping almost .7 second difference between said shitty auto and the TR-6060 Tremec 6spd that is the manual trans....
Yeah, that's some BS right there... I'd expect maybe a .1-.3 difference, but almost a full second?!?!?! C'Mon.... even if you give the fact that Motortrend and Road&Hack have shitty drivers...that's still a HUGE difference...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew
Motor Trend tested a manual, these times were for the automatic equipped cars. As I said, Edmunds even got 12.6 from an auto equipped car, so please stop just searching and looking for the bad times......
|
Please see the above.... almost a half second faster with an auto, a shitty auto at that? Really?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperTomcat
Because it hurts ones pride when the reality that the SS is now the slowest of the 3 pony cars stock. The way you make yourself feel better is by insisting that the 392 Challengers doing those runs are not stock and by clinging to the slowest magazine time.
|
Actually, I don't care how fast they are.... they're all great cars to drive and own. I'm just glad that we still have them in this day and age...
However, if we go simply by the stock numbers, it's painfully obvious someone is full of crap.... there's no way the same auto tranny, an increase of almost 100lbs, an increase of 45hp, and the extra 70lbs of torque shave off almost a full second on this car..... it's simple physics...and I don't need to debate that with anyone...
Either the car we see in the video is modded (possible) or Chrysler is full of shit on their HP ratings..... because there is no WAY that just 45hp is gettin that done.. so again... while I may be wrong in that that is a legit video....I'm right in that there is no physical way only 45hp is doing those numbers..
As for the whole comparison of SS vs. SRT-8....here's the biggest problem with the comparison....
1SS = 30k$
SRT-8 = 45k$
I don't care about anything else.... you can't touch a brand new SRT8 for under 40k.....but I can get a brand new 1SS for 30k, maybe even less. It's still an SS.....the added bells and whistles dont add a single thing to the car performance wise....