Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye
Figure out a way.
Discuss the politics behind it, but don't slander either side...it's pointless and irritating to read/edit. And you can't discuss what lies ahead, because nobody knows and rumors/theories do nothing constructive in this subject area whatsoever. This idea of a nationalized auto Industry is a perfect example...
We have a strict policy about politics, you all know that.
|
I'll try to restate that with a response to PQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by irpq11
That was a very subdued and clever way to continue this discusion. But I can't think of anything else. I didn't read it. The title of this thread makes it difficult. I can think objectively but I also beleive what I beleive I know.  Or....something......like ...that. Ya. |
Talk more about the what, instead of the who or why.
A group is being formed for oversight of the auto industry. The political leanings of the president (and your opinion of said leaning) have little to do with that fact. Similarly, slippery slop/snowballed 'and eventually we will be . . . ' scenarios are based upon political opinion and have minimal relevance to the topic at hand.
clear as mud?