Dyno tune vs email. Comparison - Page 2 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

2010SSRSM6 · 02-24-2014, 11:20 PM

I'm aSsuming the Trans tune was rewOrked as well where the enGine tune was off. 😁

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CHMSC · 02-24-2014, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2010SSRSM6

I'm aSsuming the Trans tune was rewOrked as well where the enGine tune was off. 😁

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

axis · 02-24-2014, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2010SSRSM6

I'm aSsuming the Trans tune was rewOrked as well where the enGine tune was off. 😁

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh yeah. Not just there, but most places in the table. The original tune was much better than stock but the dyno tune was much better than the original.

TBone · 02-24-2014, 11:34 PM

So, wait which one was best? I'm confused.

T.

grocerygetter · 02-24-2014, 11:37 PM

In b4 the delete! I witnessed this...just sayin.
Tbone...bold=gpi=more safer power.
This being said. Something like what ryan does at gpi can be mail ordered. It still has more attention to detail and not just a mass up down scale 7 percent tune via a sCT loader.

Nightmare2012 · 02-25-2014, 01:14 AM

Isn't the SCT tuner more for ford than GM? I wOuLd sTeeR cLear FrOm any tOOners that use gEnEric tOONes jSt saYing.

revived · 02-25-2014, 01:18 AM

There is no comparison dyno is always better much better..

2010SSRSM6 · 02-25-2014, 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightmare2012

Isn't the SCT tuner more for ford than GM? I wOuLd sTeeR cLear FrOm any tOOners that use gEnEric tOONes jSt saYing.

Just based on REviewS from Users who Can tune with both and are Knowledgeable with other Systems, I'd stick with HP tuners or EFI live for a L99 or LS3 powered car

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JANNETTYRACING · 02-25-2014, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by axis

With all the talk about remote tuning, thought i'd post up my results. This is a popular SCT custom email tune on the thin line and a GPI dyno tune on the bold. Car is a L99, Kooks 1 3/4 headers with HFC's, and a Halltech Yellowjacket. No hero runs here. Car was at operating temps before the logs were run. 4X runs on the email tune to get a baseline and used the best repeatable run. Rhino (GPI) did a great job and was very professional. VVT tables were properly set to get the most HP/Tq at the earliest rpm.

This isn't posted to bash remote tuning, but for many to understand the reasoning why some people say to dyno tune whenever possible. IMO, you can't see the fine tuning needed for getting the most from your car with just logs. You can get close if you have a GOOD tuner that pays close attention to the logs but there's always a little left on the table.

Nice Job Axis/Rhino

You have to admit to get within 3-4% without any Wide Band Logging or Dyno time is not to bad.

Had you Logged with a Wide Band and or put it on the dyno and sent me the Data We could Certainly have Nailed it for you.

Congrats, Your in Good Hands.

Ted.

2SSCAMARO · 02-25-2014, 06:17 AM

Why the big drop in the thin line torque curve at 4350 rpm followed by a steep rise to 4500 rpm and then followed by an immediate decline?

JANNETTYRACING · 02-25-2014, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightmare2012

Isn't the SCT tuner more for ford than GM?

SCT Started in the Ford Market Yes but the GM stuff is Awesome.

I own All 4 Major Tuning Suites and use them all, but for this Platform SCT is Very good and makes remote tuning easy.

I have Remote tuned right around 1700 Cars with SCT.

I also do remote tuning with HPtuner, EFIlive, and Diablo.

I assure you there is nothing generic about remote tuning.

Ted.

*The_Blur* · 02-25-2014, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

SCT Started in the Ford Market Yes but the GM stuff is Awesome.

I own All 4 Major Tuning Suites and use them all, but for this Platform SCT is Very good and makes remote tuning easy.

I have Remote tuned right around 1700 Cars with SCT.

I also do remote tuning with HPtuner, EFIlive, and Diablo.

I assure you there is nothing generic about remote tuning.

Ted.

The key is in data logging.

Rhino79 · 02-25-2014, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2SSCAMARO

Why the big drop in the thin line torque curve at 4350 rpm followed by a steep rise to 4500 rpm and then followed by an immediate decline?

Usually when you see that, its from spark knock.

SolomonAKOO · 02-25-2014, 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

Nice Job Axis/Rhino

You have to admit to get within 3-4% without any Wide Band Logging or Dyno time is not to bad.

Had you Logged with a Wide Band and or put it on the dyno and sent me the Data We could Certainly have Nailed it for you.

Congrats, Your in Good Hands.

Ted.

So was that your tune?

02-24-2014, 11:20 PM	#15
2010SSRSM6 Drives: My wife crazy with my C5 usage. Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: DFW Posts: 6,558 View My Garage	I'm aSsuming the Trans tune was rewOrked as well where the enGine tune was off. 😁 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ UNDER CONSTRUCTION......again......

02-24-2014, 11:34 PM	#18
TBone Negative Camber Junkie Drives: 2010 1SS LS3/6MN ABM 1 of 23 Join Date: May 2009 Location: ChiTown, IL Posts: 1,824	So, wait which one was best? I'm confused. T. __________________ "Horsepower is something that looks great in a Magazine article, but suspension is what actually gets you around the track fast.." Jack Olsen The drag strip is like sniffing glue, it's cheap, it's a decent buzz, it doesn't last long and they are all the same. Road racing is like China White Heroin, the buzz is stronger, the high lasts for hours, it's extremely addictive and they are all different. I can't wait for my next Track fix. DA HAWKS OWN DA CUP!!!!!

02-24-2014, 11:37 PM	#19
grocerygetter instigator Drives: 2020 6.2 Trail Boss, 2022 XC90 Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: 72034 Posts: 3,979 View My Garage	In b4 the delete! I witnessed this...just sayin. Tbone...bold=gpi=more safer power. This being said. Something like what ryan does at gpi can be mail ordered. It still has more attention to detail and not just a mass up down scale 7 percent tune via a sCT loader. __________________ -John S.

02-25-2014, 01:18 AM	#21
revived Vrrrm. Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: MA Posts: 1,495	There is no comparison dyno is always better much better.. __________________

02-25-2014, 06:17 AM	#24
2SSCAMARO Drives: 2010 Camaro Auto Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Fl Posts: 1,164	Why the big drop in the thin line torque curve at 4350 rpm followed by a steep rise to 4500 rpm and then followed by an immediate decline? __________________ Just livin' life

02-25-2014, 01:14 AM	#20
Nightmare2012 come find out;) Drives: stockish 2012 camaro ss Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: speed county Posts: 2,166 View My Garage	Isn't the SCT tuner more for ford than GM? I wOuLd sTeeR cLear FrOm any tOOners that use gEnEric tOONes jSt saYing.