Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-02-2019, 12:23 PM   #1
Hero_Camaro
 
Hero_Camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2.0T RS
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: CANADA
Posts: 51
Why does the camaro 6 Gen have a big and heavy stock muffler?

Hey Guys,

I've always wondered about this why does the camaro have an ugly heavy muffler that doesn't do anything useful meanwhile the 5th Gen has a more lightweight stock muffler that is easy to store can someone really explain this for me?
Hero_Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 12:32 PM   #2
parish8

 
Drives: 17 SS a8
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
I am curious how much it helps with aerodynamics?
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 12:38 PM   #3
DaveC113

 
DaveC113's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1SS 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by parish8 View Post
I am curious how much it helps with aerodynamics?
Probably quite a bit. It directs air under the bumper cover rather than having the bumper cover act as a parachute.

I think this is a big reason why many mufflers are designed like this today, another reason is the larger muffler will be effective at lower frequencies, overall it may give the exhaust sound engineers more latitude to play with how the exhaust sounds.

And yes, I'd be willing to bet every car mfg'er has engineers dedicated to making the car sound good. Probably more money into that than safety, lol...

I also have a hard time believing the aftermarket exhaust vendors are not dealing with the aero issues getting rid of the stock muffler will create.
DaveC113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 12:41 PM   #4
2SSRS@Gen5diy
 
2SSRS@Gen5diy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Z/28 #82+#192, 18ZLE 66Nova
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: By the lake in AZ
Posts: 15,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by parish8 View Post
I am curious how much it helps with aerodynamics?
It does that to some degree, but only as you go faster and faster, as to the OP GM likes to sell metal that's why the big suitcase in the rear, LOL.
2SSRS@Gen5diy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 12:51 PM   #5
DaveC113

 
DaveC113's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1SS 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSRS@Gen5diy View Post
It does that to some degree, but only as you go faster and faster, as to the OP GM likes to sell metal that's why the big suitcase in the rear, LOL.
Ok, aerodynamic drag is related to speed, yes.

As for your conspiracy theory, GTFO with that BS!
DaveC113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 01:17 PM   #6
Umbriel

 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
I highly doubt, and I could be wrong, that aerodynamics become an issue with aftermarket exhaust until well over 100 mph.
Umbriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 01:29 PM   #7
2SSRS@Gen5diy
 
2SSRS@Gen5diy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Z/28 #82+#192, 18ZLE 66Nova
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: By the lake in AZ
Posts: 15,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveC113 View Post
Ok, aerodynamic drag is related to speed, yes.

As for your conspiracy theory, GTFO with that BS!
Please learn to read, LOL means its a joke, happy new year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Umbriel View Post
I highly doubt, and I could be wrong, that aerodynamics become an issue with aftermarket exhaust until well over 100 mph.
Lets see my last on star report had me doing a lot of that at 132+ in the straight, all on the track guys so don't freak out, but have you ever been behind a car doing 65-75 MPH and you see there rear bumper flapping in the wind, i have lots of time so it starts lower then you think.
2SSRS@Gen5diy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 01:35 PM   #8
Umbriel

 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSRS@Gen5diy View Post
Please learn to read, LOL means its a joke, happy new year.



Lets see my last on star report had me doing a lot of that at 132+ in the straight, all on the track guys so don't freak out, but have you ever been behind a car doing 65-75 MPH and you see there rear bumper flapping in the wind, i have lots of time so it starts lower then you think.
I have yes but I was referring to these cars in particular when I made that statement. I still have mine but it will be coming off as soon as my AWE catback arrives and I'll look at it at that point and address it then if it looks like an issue.
Umbriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 02:14 PM   #9
parish8

 
Drives: 17 SS a8
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
I was thinking more along the lines if mpg. If that unit back there reduces turbulence and gains .1 mpg then that’s the reason right there. Why wouldn’t hey do it.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 02:19 PM   #10
DaveC113

 
DaveC113's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1SS 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Umbriel View Post
I highly doubt, and I could be wrong, that aerodynamics become an issue with aftermarket exhaust until well over 100 mph.
It'll cost some gas and contribute to lift, both of which are not good. Aero issues become somewhat significant at highway speeds and could actually effect lap times and handling at higher speeds.

Fuel economy is a big deal for car companies, so if it save .5 mpg at highway speeds it's very significant.

Only way to know for sure how much of an issue it is would be a wind tunnel or computer simulation though.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSRS@Gen5diy View Post
Please learn to read, LOL means its a joke, happy new year.
OK, sorry about that. Lots of people accuse car companies of all sorts of crazy stuff. Maybe some of it's true, but I'd bet not a lot.
DaveC113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 03:07 PM   #11
parish8

 
Drives: 17 SS a8
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by YARBIE 1 View Post
emissions and noise, nuf said.
That muffler has no effect on emissions.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2019, 04:52 PM   #12
vtirocz


 
vtirocz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hero_Camaro View Post
Hey Guys,

I've always wondered about this why does the camaro have an ugly heavy muffler that doesn't do anything useful meanwhile the 5th Gen has a more lightweight stock muffler that is easy to store can someone really explain this for me?
I agree with the others on aerodynamics.

Regarding the weight, I needed to drop the exhaust for my shifter change and it's a lot lighter than I thought it might be. I'd be surprised if the 5th gen mufflers (or aftermarket mufflers) are all that much lighter, but I'd love to see some data on this.
__________________
2017 Camaro 1SS, M6, Hurst shifter, Hyper Blue, NPP, Gray Split Spoke Wheels

Best 1/4 Mile: 12.24 @ 115.9 mph
vtirocz is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.