The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2021, 08:47 AM   #15
Motor Fast
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Florida
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRKS1D3 View Post
These people are taking their vehicles and jacking up the front end, so the trajectory of said vehicle appears to be on a 45 degree angle. If you believe that it is safe and intelligent to eliminate ~50-60% of the driver's forward sight because he/she can't see over the hood, then more power to you.

These folks could save a lot of time and money by just buying a welding hood and wearing it every time they get behind the wheel. Trust me, without a heliarc stinger lit up in your hand, you can't see a thing.
You're probably right with this modification, although I've never been in a vehicle like this to see for myself. I'm more upset with what the EPA seems to be doing lately. I tried ordering a set of headers for my new 2003 ZO6 from KOOK's and they wanted the VIN and me to sign a form saying I would never use this car on the road, so I ended going with another high end company. They're wasting so much tax money on such a small niche market when they really could and should focus on real issues that would be beneficial.
__________________
2002 Camaro SS | 2003 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Corvette| 2016 Corvette Z06 C7.R | 2018 Camaro SS 1LE
Motor Fast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2021, 12:07 PM   #16
ABM2SS
 
Drives: 2010 SS M6 ABM
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Nashville, IN
Posts: 268
Reading this thread, two things come to mind:

1) Would make it easier to unload gravel

2) Reminds me of when one of my Marine buddies picked-up a fat girl at the E-Club. When they climbed in the back of another friend's S10 pick-up, it looked that.

Last edited by ABM2SS; 10-06-2021 at 09:10 AM.
ABM2SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2021, 07:54 AM   #17
h422694
 
h422694's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Z06 7 Spd, 2024 High Country HD
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motor Fast View Post
Exactly what I was thinking. Just because something is not of interest to you does not mean it should be banned. They do this but where's the focus on people using their phones while driving and tailgaters that ride a car length behind you?
Pretty sure most states already have laws against these.
h422694 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2021, 09:52 AM   #18
lbls1


 
lbls1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS SOM; 2015 Malibu LTZ
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 4,019
They should. It looks stupid. I was wondering why I noticed some stupid trucks looking like that.
__________________
'02 CAMARO SS SOM; 5.7L LS1/FLS6B
'08 TBSS AWD Black Granite Metallic
'15 Malibu LTZ 2LZ Turbo

'14 CAMARO ZL1 Blue Ray Metallic
lbls1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2021, 07:49 PM   #19
Motor Fast
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Florida
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by h422694 View Post
Pretty sure most states already have laws against these.
They do, but there doesn't seem to be much focus on them. If I wasn't so alert I'm sure I would have been in a few wrecks from these kind of people.
__________________
2002 Camaro SS | 2003 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Corvette| 2016 Corvette Z06 C7.R | 2018 Camaro SS 1LE
Motor Fast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2021, 05:07 PM   #20
ChrisBlair
Buick 455 Fan
 
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Lung Jimmy View Post
If I were governor I would ban it just because it looks stupid.
And I would vote for you twice
__________________
ChrisBlair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2021, 05:20 PM   #21
ChrisBlair
Buick 455 Fan
 
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteMale View Post
You're spot on here.
Except for the little bitsy point that the truck has the danger existent at all times when operated, as a default condition. It is inherent at all times. The car is merely dangerous by potential of misuse. And every car on the road can be dangerous by misuse in some manner or another- even this truck, in factory configuration. So now you're talking about adding one inherent danger on top of another potential danger, for the truck.

So no, demonstrably the two things are not in the same ballpark and he is not spot on. That's illogical and frankly silly.
__________________
ChrisBlair is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.