added e force

[NHCamaroSS]

My eforce set up

[sscamaro]

Here is a picture of mine.

[Must go faster]

Has anyone had any issues with their Eforce? I never hear of any problems after the fuel mod.

[NHCamaroSS]

I haven't changed my fuel pump yet. Was told I should be good unless I try to mod it more or use other pulley . Only put a few hundred miles on it so hard to say

[Mkn95u0]

Originally Posted by 1KillerSS

Not to rain on your parade, but a cam'd camaro with full bolt on's can make that power without the blower. Go get yourself a proper tune, there is a lot more power to be had there. Personally I wouldn't worry about the power train warranty. Dont get me wrong, horsepower will always find the weakest link, but IMO you've got a log way to go before you start risking internal failures.

this power is about right for an e-force. there really isnt much more you can pull out of it with the stock pulley, even with full bolt ons you're looking 480's max. (L99's come with an even smaller pulley, pulls 434rwhp with the stock e-force pulley. have to jump from the 3.875" to the 3.5" to make a decent power. 434rwhp is LS3's with bolt ons. it's sad, i know)

yes, cam'd camaro's with full bolt ons can make that power with out the blower, but they make it much later. the hp/tq curves on a charged set up will make a lot of low end power and stay pretty level through out the power band.

but i agree, i didn't even think about getting the warranty or care to keep it.

[Hippy]

Happy with my e-force.
Last year it put down 491 @ dyno day @ tunetime https://youtu.be/w8xfGy8vyvs
Only added the fuel rail upgrade
Other than that it's a out of the box eldobrock eforce setup,20 thousand miles later and it's still perfect.

I Planned and bought headers exhaust cam Fuel pump injectors Module etc to install this past winter but I was to busy at work. So this coming winter.
It's time to drive

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

[1KillerSS]

Originally Posted by Mkn95u0

this power is about right for an e-force. there really isnt much more you can pull out of it with the stock pulley, even with full bolt ons you're looking 480's max. (L99's come with an even smaller pulley, pulls 434rwhp with the stock e-force pulley. have to jump from the 3.875" to the 3.5" to make a decent power. 434rwhp is LS3's with bolt ons. it's sad, i know)

yes, cam'd camaro's with full bolt ons can make that power with out the blower, but they make it much later. the hp/tq curves on a charged set up will make a lot of low end power and stay pretty level through out the power band.

but i agree, i didn't even think about getting the warranty or care to keep it.

Yea, I'm not trying to discourage the OP. It just seems though the horsepower to dollar ratio is pretty high. Congratulations to the OP, enjoy it buddy, soon you will catch the bug, then its open the wallet again!

[NHCamaroSS]

I pulled 531 on the Dyno with the e force, cold air, and custom tune. I was happy with those results personally

[drago]

i was told a good tune would up me 50 rwhp. when the wife is not looking i am going to do fuel rail, bigger injectors, the electric box for the fuel pump to increase pressure, headers and a better air box. maybe next year, this year i want to do half shafts. i gotta go slow , i am only about 1 part away from sleeping on the couch and i am to old for that lol

[sscamaro]

Originally Posted by NHCamaroSS

I pulled 531 on the Dyno with the e force, cold air, and custom tune. I was happy with those results personally

I'm at 546/rwhp and 522/rwtq with the set up in my sig.

[Mkn95u0]

Originally Posted by NHCamaroSS

I pulled 531 on the Dyno with the e force, cold air, and custom tune. I was happy with those results personally

L99 or LS3?

Originally Posted by sscamaro

I'm at 546/rwhp and 522/rwtq with the set up in my sig.

LS3 has higher gains than the L99 when it comes to bolt ons and sc'ing at least. what size pulley are you at?
i'm e-force w/ 3.25" pulley and on E85 and only make 532/526 to the wheels (full bolt ons, Long tubes, no cats, tuned)... but i have the L99.

I'm just trying to see some differences between the two is reason for asking

[sscamaro]

Originally Posted by Mkn95u0

L99 or LS3?



LS3 has higher gains than the L99 when it comes to bolt ons and sc'ing at least. what size pulley are you at?
i'm e-force w/ 3.25" pulley and on E85 and only make 532/526 to the wheels (full bolt ons, Long tubes, no cats, tuned)... but i have the L99.

I'm just trying to see some differences between the two is reason for asking

I'm running the stock Edelbrock pulley. Mine was running out of fuel at 6500 rpm. That's why I installed the ZL1 fuel pump and 72# injectors.

[Redbeard 11]

I have had my eforce for about 10,000 miles with 1 issue. fuel was running out up top but still ran 519/ 566 and then added the alky kit and ran 576/566. Definitely a good s/c in my opinion.

[NHCamaroSS]

Originally Posted by Mkn95u0

L99 or LS3?



LS3 has higher gains than the L99 when it comes to bolt ons and sc'ing at least. what size pulley are you at?
i'm e-force w/ 3.25" pulley and on E85 and only make 532/526 to the wheels (full bolt ons, Long tubes, no cats, tuned)... but i have the L99.

I'm just trying to see some differences between the two is reason for asking

I have the LS3 with stock edelbrock pulley. Didn't want to change pulley yet. May do that next pump know I better upgrade the fuel delivery before I do any other mods.. We bought a 2013 Camaro ss yesterday with the ls3 as well, the slp supercharger, and only 3000 miles and I can say that I believe the edelbrock pulls better